Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2

Carl Frampton by KO/TKO
7
8%
Carl Frampton by Decision
46
55%
Leo Santa Cruz by KO/TKO
2
2%
Leo Santa Cruz by Decision
23
28%
Draw
5
6%
 
Total votes: 83

Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Stuarty30 wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Because it's a different fight and different fighters.... Just because A beats B doesn't mean he beats C! You're a fan of the sport mate so you know how it goes....
No of course it doesn't mean that. But you can still assess a fighter's skills and draw conclusions as to how a prospective match-up would go.
Of course you can but it's hardly an exact science. I happen to think that Frampton beats Rigo but it's a subjective sport. There's a lot to think about when two top level guys face off. It comes down to more than who's the better boxer or who punches harder... Frampton has the tools to beat Rigo and Rigo has the tools to beat Carl. It all comes down to the night they fight ( if they do)
Personally I think the fact that Frampton has done everything possible to avoid the Rigo fight suggests he doesn't think he would win...
nitro5912
Middleweight
Posts: 733
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 13:02

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by nitro5912 »

Caught the last half of the fight, all 5rounds I watched you could have given it either way.

I think if it comes to Belfast, you might see a similar fight with a,different result.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by rd350lc »

nitro5912 wrote:Caught the last half of the fight, all 5rounds I watched you could have given it either way.

I think if it comes to Belfast, you might see a similar fight with a,different result.
see what you are saying apart from the 11th that was clearly LSC's in my mind .

The first half of the fight Santa Cruz was just slightly better behind the jab .
Emmseegee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1400
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 10:29

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Emmseegee »

The right man got the nod in a closely contested fight. I had Santa Cruz winning by 2 rounds but would be interested to see the 3 scorecards, Id imagine there werent many rounds that any guy took on all 3 scorecards and that would show how close the fight was. Santa Cruz did however win a couple of rounds quite clearly and those I did score for Frampton could have easily went the other way.

It wasnt a barnstormer but I enjoyed it, well matched fighters. I was confident that Framptob was gonna win beforehand but think I underestimated Santa Cruz ability to stick to a gameplan.

Both guys come away with reputations intact with options for further paydays
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Finn »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
No of course it doesn't mean that. But you can still assess a fighter's skills and draw conclusions as to how a prospective match-up would go.
Of course you can but it's hardly an exact science. I happen to think that Frampton beats Rigo but it's a subjective sport. There's a lot to think about when two top level guys face off. It comes down to more than who's the better boxer or who punches harder... Frampton has the tools to beat Rigo and Rigo has the tools to beat Carl. It all comes down to the night they fight ( if they do)
Personally I think the fact that Frampton has done everything possible to avoid the Rigo fight suggests he doesn't think he would win...
Has he tried avoiding him?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Horse »

Wales wrote:Not a huge shock the head of sky boxing "cheerleading" one of his biggest assets. I put it on mute around the 4th.
He's not a cheerleader though.

Do people actually listen to him?

He's always looking to score rounds for the foreigner.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Horse »

forcefraser wrote:I`d prefer a Frampton v Selby first.
I agree.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Finn wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Of course you can but it's hardly an exact science. I happen to think that Frampton beats Rigo but it's a subjective sport. There's a lot to think about when two top level guys face off. It comes down to more than who's the better boxer or who punches harder... Frampton has the tools to beat Rigo and Rigo has the tools to beat Carl. It all comes down to the night they fight ( if they do)
Personally I think the fact that Frampton has done everything possible to avoid the Rigo fight suggests he doesn't think he would win...
Has he tried avoiding him?
Yes.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Oiky »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Finn wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Personally I think the fact that Frampton has done everything possible to avoid the Rigo fight suggests he doesn't think he would win...
Has he tried avoiding him?
Yes.
Frampton don't want rigo
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Horse »

Stuarty30 wrote:Best fighter we've had on these shores since Calzaghe IMO...
Carl Froch was better.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Stuarty »

Horse wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Best fighter we've had on these shores since Calzaghe IMO...
Carl Froch was better.
Not technically he wasn't. Great fighter though :TU:
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Oiky »

Horse wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Best fighter we've had on these shores since Calzaghe IMO...
Carl Froch was better.
Froch is one hell of a fighter but calzaghe would of boxed his ears off 7days a week :TU:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Horse »

Stuarty30 wrote:Not technically he wasn't. Great fighter though :TU:
As things stand Froch's record is much stronger than Frampton's.

What's so special about Frampton's technique?

I think that he's a tad overrated.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Horse wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Best fighter we've had on these shores since Calzaghe IMO...
Carl Froch was better.
Given your P4P rankings, surely you think Fury is better as well?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Horse »

Boxerbeetle wrote:Given your P4P rankings, surely you think Fury is better as well?
Yes.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Wow a Mexican boxing to plan! Focusing on tactics and not fighting. Basically Santa Cruz kept it long moat of the night and his dad obviously sussed out the plan from the first fight!

Cant see a rematch as lsc would win again can see Frampton Selby now!
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Andrew »

bigjack wrote:
Cholo_cws wrote:I guess I want Frampton to win but I wouldn't mind McGuigan's nose being put out of joint.



I like Frampton but i'm glad the McGuigans have had their smug grins wiped off their faces,they really pissed me off with the Scott Quigg build up and changing room crap.
They were just trolling Quigg with that who shown mental weakness.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Horse »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:Wow a Mexican boxing to plan! Focusing on tactics and not fighting. Basically Santa Cruz kept it long moat of the night and his dad obviously sussed out the plan from the first fight!

Cant see a rematch as lsc would win again can see Frampton Selby now!
Is Frampton too small for this weight?
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Andrew »

Finn wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Of course you can but it's hardly an exact science. I happen to think that Frampton beats Rigo but it's a subjective sport. There's a lot to think about when two top level guys face off. It comes down to more than who's the better boxer or who punches harder... Frampton has the tools to beat Rigo and Rigo has the tools to beat Carl. It all comes down to the night they fight ( if they do)
Personally I think the fact that Frampton has done everything possible to avoid the Rigo fight suggests he doesn't think he would win...
Has he tried avoiding him?
The Frampton v Rigo ducking talk annoys me big time.

The ducking talk should be directed to Scott Quigg who was paraded as a legitimate world champion for years when he wasn't also Joe Gallagher and Hearn were as clear as day that they would never fight him even though it could easily have been made before they fought Frampton.

He was the one who should have been calling Rigo because Rigo was the legitimate WBA champion. Yet the WBA never mandated them to fight and if they did Quigg would have moved up to featherweight quicker than Usian bolt can run 100metres. They then stripped Rigo so they can get a piece of that Frampton Quigg money.

Yes I know Rigo was mandated to fight the winner but moving up a weight division to fight another top class fighter is not a duck.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Horse »

Naandrew wrote:The Frampton v Rigo ducking talk annoys me big time.

The ducking talk should be directed to Scott Quigg who was paraded as a legitimate world champion for years when he wasn't also Joe Gallagher and Hearn were as clear as day that they would never fight him even though it could easily have been made before they fought Frampton.

He was the one who should have been calling Rigo because Rigo was the legitimate WBA champion. Yet the WBA never mandated them to fight and if they did Quigg would have moved up to featherweight quicker than Usian bolt can run 100metres. They then stripped Rigo so they can get a piece of that Frampton Quigg money.

Yes I know Rigo was mandated to fight the winner but moving up a weight division to fight another top class fighter is not a duck.
Frampton ducked him.
manchester-mexican
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 247
Joined: 15 Jul 2007, 11:18

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by manchester-mexican »

Strange performance from Frampton, seemed to neglect his boxing n go for power shots, maybe got carried away with the fact he was ko' ing sparring partners.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Autobarn »

Horse wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Not technically he wasn't. Great fighter though :TU:
As things stand Froch's record is much stronger than Frampton's.

What's so special about Frampton's technique?

I think that he's a tad overrated.
Well said, he's more awkward. And his right hand often goes really wide.
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5172
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by TheLeprechaun »

I don't know why people want to watch Rigo.

His fights make Malik Scott vs Luis Ortiz look like Hagler vs Hearns.

He is genuinely the most boring fighter out there today with a personality about as interesting as a pair of old boots in my closet.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by Oiky »

TheLeprechaun wrote:I don't know why people want to watch Rigo.

His fights make Malik Scott vs Luis Ortiz look like Hagler vs Hearns.

He is genuinely the most boring fighter out there today with a personality about as interesting as a pair of old boots in my closet.
Great fighter , but has had a few stinkers
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5172
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Carl Frampton vs Leo Santa Cruz 2 - The Rematch is on.

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Oiky wrote:
TheLeprechaun wrote:I don't know why people want to watch Rigo.

His fights make Malik Scott vs Luis Ortiz look like Hagler vs Hearns.

He is genuinely the most boring fighter out there today with a personality about as interesting as a pair of old boots in my closet.
Great fighter , but has had a few stinkers

The most frustrating thing is he seems too thick to understand why people don't care about him as a fighter. Dropped by every major network and fighting for peanuts. Travelling to Japan for fights. This is a guy who has p4p power and all the talent to genuinely be number 1 p4p. It's not like he doesn't have the talent to blast the likes of Dickens out in a matter of minutes. He hemmed and hawwed against Donaire when he had him figured out. So many cases where he could easily have pushed for a good finish in fights but he doesn't seem to have the intellect to do that.
Post Reply