Scott Quigg

Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Scott Quigg

Post by Ezzard »

His nemesis just lost a narrow decision. Scot himself lost narrowly to Frampton and I thought was coming on string until the last round.

He probably got his tactic wrong too.

I'm a big fan of Carl and Scott... Really want to see Quigg get himself back in the mix of world class fighters very, very soon. I fear he'll stagnate...and these are key years in his career.

Any rumours of what's next for him?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Horse »

Quigg should go back to super bantamweight and smash Rigondeaux up.

Frampton isn't important. Quigg shouldn't waste his career chasing him around for the rematch.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Stuarty »

A fight with Selby should be easy enough to make. It's looking like Frampton will chase the LSC rematch.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Horse »

Stuarty30 wrote:It's looking like Frampton will chase the LSC rematch.
Boring!
ozzy1875
Middleweight
Posts: 164
Joined: 11 May 2014, 14:49

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by ozzy1875 »

Ezzard wrote:His nemesis just lost a narrow decision. Scot himself lost narrowly to Frampton and I thought was coming on string until the last round.

He probably got his tactic wrong too.

I'm a big fan of Carl and Scott... Really want to see Quigg get himself back in the mix of world class fighters very, very soon. I fear he'll stagnate...and these are key years in his career.

Any rumours of what's next for him?
Lets have it right, those cards in the Frampton fight were a bit of a farce, it was a clear points win for Carl, but I agree, Quigg did come on strong.

I was told two weeks ago that Quigg had no idea who he was boxing on the Crolla card and he was becoming frustrated. What wouldn't surprise me is if he has a keep busy fight on the Manchester bill and had a bigger fight on the Wembley show.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Stuarty »

Horse wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:It's looking like Frampton will chase the LSC rematch.
Boring!
You seem a very hard guy to please so your opinion on this matter means little.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Horse »

Stuarty30 wrote:You seem a very hard guy to please so your opinion on this matter means little.
There are plenty of other world class opponents for both of them to fight.

They should stop wasting each other's primes and fight other opponents.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Stuarty »

Horse wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:You seem a very hard guy to please so your opinion on this matter means little.
There are plenty of other world class opponents for both of them to fight.

They should stop wasting each other's primes and fight other opponents.
If the money is right then why not? They have had two enjoyable fights so I don't understand your bitching?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Horse »

Stuarty30 wrote:If the money is right then why not? They have had two enjoyable fights so I don't understand your bitching?
I hope the money isn't right.

Their 2nd fight wasn't enjoyable, it was a mess.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by ElJefe »

Plenty of good fights for Quigg at 126. Selby, Mares, Russell Jr, Valdez. Even someone like Warrington would be better that knocking over relatively unknown opponents. And of course the Frampton rematch is an option, although I'd prefer to see him get a good win or two before that.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Ezzard »

Scott needs an opponent to put him right back in the mix.

If he can make Super-Bantam then he should. But my guess is that he can't.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Stuarty »

Horse wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:If the money is right then why not? They have had two enjoyable fights so I don't understand your bitching?
I hope the money isn't right.

Their 2nd fight wasn't enjoyable, it was a mess.
Wasn't as good as the first fight but result aside I enjoyed it however you're certainly entitled to your opinion.

If they fight again I'll look forward to it but if they go a different route I'll look forward to that as well. I can't see LSC coming to Belfast but I hope I'm wrong as I wouldn't mind going.

Back on to Quigg, I quite like the idea of him and Selby. That little drug cheat Galahad will probably be in the mix as well if he takes care of a tricky Agbeko later in the week.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5462
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by forcefraser »

Quiggy v Loma or Russell jr.

Poor old quiggy would be pasted
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Horse »

forcefraser wrote:Quiggy v Loma or Russell jr.

Poor old quiggy would be pasted
Why is everyone crowing over Russell Jr?
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Stuarty »

Horse wrote:
forcefraser wrote:Quiggy v Loma or Russell jr.

Poor old quiggy would be pasted
Why is everyone crowing over Russell Jr?
Fastest hands in boxing apparently.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23225
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by handsofstone »

Stuarty30 wrote:
Horse wrote:
forcefraser wrote:Quiggy v Loma or Russell jr.

Poor old quiggy would be pasted
Why is everyone crowing over Russell Jr?
Fastest hands in boxing apparently.
And he has a brother called Gary Russell, whats not to like?
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3380
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

There are so many good fights to be made but Scott always seems to end up fighting obscure opponents with the exception of Frampton and Martinez.

He's 28 now and hasn't got many years left - each fight must be meaningful from now on, none of this keep busy rubbish
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5462
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by forcefraser »

Doesn't have the strongest résumé does he.

I like the guy though, just an honest lad. To be fair to him to say most people were creaming their daks over Frampton before his loss to LSC, Quigg did alright against him. He fought with a broken jaw and made it a relatively close fight. Certainly took the share of the second half of the fight.

He is not up there with the very top of the Featherweight division though.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Crease »

Ezzard wrote:Really want to see Quigg get himself back in the mix of world class fighters very, very soon. I fear he'll stagnate...and these are key years in his career.
Any rumours of what's next for him?
Eddie Hearn has said in a couple of IFL interviews that he would like to make Selby vs Quigg.

And that looks increasingly likely now that Frampton only wants LSC.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Crease »

Stuarty30 wrote: I can't see LSC coming to Belfast but I hope I'm wrong as I wouldn't mind going.
I don't think that Leo will come over either. Why would he? He's the one with the belt & why woud he agree to fight so far from home?

But, should he prove a man of his word - I'll have my tickets bought within the 1st few seconds of the release time.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Crease »

forcefraser wrote:Doesn't have the strongest résumé does he.
That's his own fault. He fought a lot of bums when he was WBA champ.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Covfefe »

Crease wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote: I can't see LSC coming to Belfast but I hope I'm wrong as I wouldn't mind going.
I don't think that Leo will come over either. Why would he? He's the one with the belt & why woud he agree to fight so far from home?

But, should he prove a man of his word - I'll have my tickets bought within the 1st few seconds of the release time.
I don't see why he won't keep his word. Frampton went over as defending champion.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by Crease »

TheDarkDestroyer wrote:I don't see why he won't keep his word. Frampton went over as defending champion.
Carl had to, there was (despite McGuigan's denials) a rematch clause installed in the contract for their 1st fight that Leo would be granted an immediate rematch in the event of his loss.

Carl has no leverage to bring Leo over. There wasn't a rematch clause this time around and Leo has the belt, he is the Champ.

Leo initoally did say that he would fight in Belfast but in the subsrquent interviews since he has said repeatedly that it's not his decision & it depends on what his team thinks.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23133
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by mickey1975 »

Showtime will want it in America.
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5172
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Scott Quigg

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Crease wrote:
TheDarkDestroyer wrote:I don't see why he won't keep his word. Frampton went over as defending champion.
Carl had to, there was (despite McGuigan's denials) a rematch clause installed in the contract for their 1st fight that Leo would be granted an immediate rematch in the event of his loss.

Carl has no leverage to bring Leo over. There wasn't a rematch clause this time around and Leo has the belt, he is the Champ.

Leo initoally did say that he would fight in Belfast but in the subsrquent interviews since he has said repeatedly that it's not his decision & it depends on what his team thinks.


I really don't see the incentive for LSC to travel abroad and face a hostile crowd. He would probably win the fight and get robbed and he knows this.

Not a chance of a Belfast fight. I could see a rematch happening in Vegas. But the problem is that the demand isn't quite there. It was pretty clear the LSC is the better fighter.
Post Reply