Broadhurst V Hamden

Post Reply
Grant
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 23 Jan 2004, 21:41

Broadhurst V Hamden

Post by Grant »

Why?
What does Trent get out of this?
Enhance reputation.......No
Enhance Skill........No
Pad record.........Yes
Enhance ranking.........No

When the average fighter fights @ 3 times a year (in a good year) why waste one of those slots on Nader?

It's just the way it is with some Aussie promotors I'm afraid. And we wonder why they get KOed when they eventually front up to a world rated opponent
DA GOOSE
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1160
Joined: 06 Jan 2013, 01:48

Re: Broadhurst V Hamden

Post by DA GOOSE »

Grant wrote:Why?
What does Trent get out of this?
Enhance reputation.......No
Enhance Skill........No
Pad record.........Yes
Enhance ranking.........No

When the average fighter fights @ 3 times a year (in a good year) why waste one of those slots on Nader?

It's just the way it is with some Aussie promotors I'm afraid. And we wonder why they get KOed when they eventually front up to a world rated opponent
Trent has another fight in March and is fighting on the Green-Mundine card for exposure(and money).

http://www.news.com.au/sport/boxing/ris ... ae9c1f0b87

So he gets money and exposure.
Grant
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 23 Jan 2004, 21:41

Re: Broadhurst V Hamden

Post by Grant »

Yeah I get it. Thanks
amwsnw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1911
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 03:24

Re: Broadhurst V Hamden

Post by amwsnw »

Grant wrote:Why?
What does Trent get out of this?
Enhance reputation.......No
Enhance Skill........No
Pad record.........Yes
Enhance ranking.........No

When the average fighter fights @ 3 times a year (in a good year) why waste one of those slots on Nader?

It's just the way it is with some Aussie promoters I'm afraid. And we wonder why they get KOed when they eventually front up to a world rated opponent
I have some real concerns regarding this bout and the long term health implications for Nader. I hope i am proven wrong but he didnt offer much in his last outing against Hooper and was handily belted over the distance. I can see it happening again, with someone I rate a bigger puncher. I don''t see any positivity for Nader or Trent. Hopefully the ref (he could play a big part so i hope it's one of our more competent third men in the ring) keeps a close eye on Nader and stops it before he takes too much punishment. Guys with Nader's heart often have to be saved from themselves.
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8569
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Broadhurst V Hamden

Post by coneye »

Don't know about anyone else , but i find it hard to get excited or even support , guys like Broadhurst , who are making a carreer out of these fights ,, Hooper - Broadhurst - Blake , Cappe... would get me thinking , yeh thats worth paying for , but they just don't happen and they should
amwsnw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1911
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 03:24

Re: Broadhurst V Hamden

Post by amwsnw »

coneye wrote:Don't know about anyone else , but i find it hard to get excited or even support , guys like Broadhurst , who are making a carreer out of these fights ,, Hooper - Broadhurst - Blake , Cappe... would get me thinking , yeh thats worth paying for , but they just don't happen and they should
Agree 100%. Trent has talent but i dont see Nader being a step up. On another topic i posted how disappointed i was in the undercard, thinking they (Boxa / Green Machine) had an opportunity to match up guys like Broadhurst, May and others with top notch opponents but they didnt. I appreciate some of our talent is on the card I just dont feel they are great match ups.
Post Reply