Cotto v Kirkland off
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Horrible fight! Glad it's off.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Maybe a chance for Cotto v Brook? Would save having to fight Spence and Cotto could be sold as this gigantic star, despite being years past his best.
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
I think % would cause a stumbling block on that oneBigGar wrote:Maybe a chance for Cotto v Brook? Would save having to fight Spence and Cotto could be sold as this gigantic star, despite being years past his best.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32965
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Poor fight, don't care that it's off tbh.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103412
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
I was kinda looking forward to Rigo vs. Flores.. No news on that yet?
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Would have been a few decent rounds of action but the winner was inevitable. Would like to see Cotto in with some top fighters but you get the feeling he wants to wind down with a couple of easier fights for good money before retirement.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Brook vs Kirkland is more likely.BigGar wrote:Maybe a chance for Cotto v Brook? Would save having to fight Spence and Cotto could be sold as this gigantic star, despite being years past his best.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Billy joe Saunders??
He was saying there was a big fight being made for him but couldn't say a lot due to the fighter already being signed into another fight...
Just a thought.
He was saying there was a big fight being made for him but couldn't say a lot due to the fighter already being signed into another fight...
Just a thought.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Was thinking the same thing.boybrooks wrote:Billy joe Saunders??
He was saying there was a big fight being made for him but couldn't say a lot due to the fighter already being signed into another fight...
Just a thought.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Finn wrote:Was thinking the same thing.boybrooks wrote:Billy joe Saunders??
He was saying there was a big fight being made for him but couldn't say a lot due to the fighter already being signed into another fight...
Just a thought.
1) Cotto does not fight at 160 the Kirkland fight was at 153.
2) Saunders next fight is against Khurtsidze the WBO called the mandatory and goes to purse bids next week if they don't do a deal.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
I think I've just about lost all interest in BJS! The guy is a slabbering moron!Naandrew wrote:Finn wrote:Was thinking the same thing.boybrooks wrote:Billy joe Saunders??
He was saying there was a big fight being made for him but couldn't say a lot due to the fighter already being signed into another fight...
Just a thought.Cotto isn't going to fight Saunders. 2 reasons.
1) Cotto does not fight at 160 the Kirkland fight was at 153.
2) Saunders next fight is against Khurtsidze the WBO called the mandatory and goes to purse bids next week if they don't do a deal.
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Fair enough! Sorry BillyKro wrote:Reported for racismStuarty30 wrote:I think I've just about lost all interest in BJS! The guy is a slabbering moron!
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
I love omar djalilli.Kro wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:Fair enough! Sorry Billy
QUIZ SHOWS!!
Re: Cotto v Kirkland off
Miguel Angel Cotto vs Antonio Margarito the trilogy
