davie wrote:Well given Degale and Frampton just leapfrogged him despite not winning then either of them could have been no1 last month, or the month before that. Fury has been inactive for a while.
I only move fighters after they've fought.
DeGale had last fought in April and Frampton had last fought in July.
Fury hadn't been that inactive at that time and neither deserved the top spot back then.
Fair enough, your list your rules
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:Despite their recent results, Frampton, Degale and Brook are the 3 beat active fighters in Britain just now, which is why you're list is starting to look that bit better
Brook is nowhere near the other two.
I'd argue that Degale and Brook are on a par pretty much with both a bit below Franmpton
Ian1973 wrote:If Fury is still eligible for the list then he should still be number one. How can he be overtaken by someone that has just lost and another that gained a draw and got smashed up?
Doesn't make sense Horse either leave Tyson in or take him out but I don't see how he can fall two places on the back of no-one winning to leapfrog him.
I found a way of doing it.
I think it is accurate.
If Fury wants to stay at No. 1 then he has to fight.
