Broner v Granados

Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by Tanzio »

Cards =

97-93 Broner
97-93 Granados
96-94 Broner

No surprises.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by diddy »

There's only 1 way that decision was going.

Hope someone else also cashed in on it.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16584
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Poor kid has no luck with decisions
DrunkenBoxer
Welterweight
Posts: 190
Joined: 30 Sep 2015, 16:05

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by DrunkenBoxer »

those score card though... Draw or Granados edging it.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46512
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by gilgamesh »

lazboy wrote:Bronwr would get caved by all the top welterweights lamount included.
Top guys at 135 or 140 beat him too.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by crusader »

Granados has still only lost by SD or MD
lazboy
Welterweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 16 Jun 2016, 21:00

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by lazboy »

gilgamesh wrote:
lazboy wrote:Bronwr would get caved by all the top welterweights lamount included.
Top guys at 135 or 140 beat him too.
U know them better than I do. I'll take your word. There's a blueprint to beat him thanks to maidana.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by Tanzio »

Broner is such a fvcking pudendum. Talks sh!t about it being easy then makes sh!t up about his hand being injured.

Then Granados goes off about legit sh!t.

THEN, Broner apologizes to everyone for being a poor role model and promises to be better!!

Classic post fight.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by Tanzio »

Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46512
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by gilgamesh »

Tanzio wrote:Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.
He ain't much more than Gatekeeper at 140 either.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by Tanzio »

gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.
He ain't much more than Gatekeeper at 140 either.
True. I doubt he can get there anymore.

I smell Broner v Peterson
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by Tanzio »

Nice Showtime card. 2017 is off to a really decent start. :clap:
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by boxing_rocks »

Tanzio wrote:Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.
I would prefer Peterson and Avetisyan to Granados and Broner. The first fight was so much cleaner and more entertaining than the second one. Can you imagine any of these 4 guys against Spence? Wouldn't last 3 rounds.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46512
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by gilgamesh »

boxing_rocks wrote:
Tanzio wrote:Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.
I would prefer Peterson and Avetisyan to Granados and Broner. The first fight was so much cleaner and more entertaining than the second one. Can you imagine any of these 4 guys against Spence? Wouldn't last 3 rounds.
It might last more than 3 rounds, but he'd dominate 'em all definitely.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by Tanzio »

boxing_rocks wrote:
Tanzio wrote:Broner is definitely nothing more than gatekeeper material at 147, and I prefer Granados in that role.
I would prefer Peterson and Avetisyan to Granados and Broner. The first fight was so much cleaner and more entertaining than the second one. Can you imagine any of these 4 guys against Spence? Wouldn't last 3 rounds.
Yep, these guys were triple A ball at best.

I did prefer the Broner v Granados fight. Would like to see Granados v Ava.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by Tanzio »

I think both Lomassiah and Mikey could beat Broner right now.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46512
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Broner v Granados

Post by gilgamesh »

Tanzio wrote:I think both Lomassiah and Mikey could beat Broner right now.
Definitely
Post Reply