Barrera vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Barrera vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
Ya'll got Beterbiev?
Got a feeling Ward may vacate IBF to allow these two to fight for it, that is if his ambition is to retire.
Got a feeling Ward may vacate IBF to allow these two to fight for it, that is if his ambition is to retire.
Last edited by TheGingerBomber on 19 Feb 2017, 22:00, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
bert all day. final fight before he take on either kov or ad
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
Huh? Alvarez is fighting Bute Friday.
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
You mean Barrera.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
That's the expert, bringing the hit scoop weeks later.Blodhemn wrote:You mean Barrera.
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
It's Barrera vs Beterbiev, not Alvarez. Seemingly confirmed for April 21st in Miami.
-
montrealsuper
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: 18 Nov 2010, 12:44
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
Good fight - Beterbiev is a beast - He's ready to Tysonize the LH division -
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
You're either a troll or you're utterly clueless! Which one is it?TheGingerBomber wrote:Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED.
The shocking thing is... a couple of self-proclaimed boxing "experts" took the thread title seriously, which illustrates their lack of knowledge about the current 175lb landscape.
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
Neither actually you mongrel.Enlightened-One wrote:You're either a troll or you're utterly clueless! Which one is it?TheGingerBomber wrote:Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED.
The shocking thing is... a couple of self-proclaimed boxing "experts" took the thread title seriously, which illustrates their lack of knowledge about the current 175lb landscape.
Last edited by TheGingerBomber on 19 Feb 2017, 21:59, edited 1 time in total.
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
Apologies to everyone apart from the mongrel.
I was looking at betting odds on Alvarez bs Bute and accidentally mixed he and Barrera, my bad, don't know how to edit the thread name?
New to this forum.
Edit; got it.
I was looking at betting odds on Alvarez bs Bute and accidentally mixed he and Barrera, my bad, don't know how to edit the thread name?
New to this forum.
Edit; got it.
Last edited by TheGingerBomber on 19 Feb 2017, 22:00, edited 1 time in total.
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
Maybe if you'd stop being an angry little man, attempting to belittle people on this board for not being failed lawyers or prized fiction writers like yourself, you'd then feel better. Son.Enlightened-One wrote:You're either a troll or you're utterly clueless! Which one is it?TheGingerBomber wrote:Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED.
The shocking thing is... a couple of self-proclaimed boxing "experts" took the thread title seriously, which illustrates their lack of knowledge about the current 175lb landscape.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
It's must be easy to get the names wrong about a fight AND also boldly proclaim it to be "CONFIRMED".TheGingerBomber wrote:Actually you mongrel.Enlightened-One wrote:You're either a troll or you're utterly clueless! Which one is it?TheGingerBomber wrote:Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED.
The shocking thing is... a couple of self-proclaimed boxing "experts" took the thread title seriously, which illustrates their lack of knowledge about the current 175lb landscape.
So when I asked you a question and gave you two options, it seems that the latter choice was more appropriate.
By the way, thanks for responding to my post twice.
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
I suppose somebody has to wear the pants in this relationship!Enlightened-One wrote:It's must be easy to get the names wrong about a fight AND also boldly proclaim it to be "CONFIRMED".TheGingerBomber wrote:Actually you mongrel.Enlightened-One wrote: You're either a troll or you're utterly clueless! Which one is it?
The shocking thing is... a couple of self-proclaimed boxing "experts" took the thread title seriously, which illustrates their lack of knowledge about the current 175lb landscape.![]()
So when I asked you a question and gave you two options, it seems that the latter choice was more appropriate.
By the way, thanks for responding to my post twice.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Barrera vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
That joke or insult (whatever you were trying to achieve), makes as much sense as your "Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED" thread title... that you've since changed!TheGingerBomber wrote:I suppose somebody has to wear the pants in this relationship!Enlightened-One wrote:It's must be easy to get the names wrong about a fight AND also boldly proclaim it to be "CONFIRMED".TheGingerBomber wrote:
Actually you mongrel.![]()
So when I asked you a question and gave you two options, it seems that the latter choice was more appropriate.
By the way, thanks for responding to my post twice.
By the way, Barrera agreed to participate in the IBF's title eliminator against Beterbiev on the 20th January, which was more than four weeks ago.
The purse bid was eventually won by GYM almost three weeks ago.
Anyway, thank you for changing the thread topic to discuss something that we all knew about a month or so ago. It's sometimes quite useful to be reminded of old news.
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Barrera vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
Was just a little something to lighten the mood, you're clearly a bit angry, why can't we all get along? After all you must be highly religious with a name like that.Enlightened-One wrote:That joke or insult (whatever you were trying to achieve), makes as much sense as your "Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED" thread title... that you've since changed!TheGingerBomber wrote:I suppose somebody has to wear the pants in this relationship!Enlightened-One wrote: It's must be easy to get the names wrong about a fight AND also boldly proclaim it to be "CONFIRMED".![]()
So when I asked you a question and gave you two options, it seems that the latter choice was more appropriate.
By the way, thanks for responding to my post twice.
By the way, Barrera agreed to participate in the IBF's title eliminator against Beterbiev on the 20th January, which was more than four weeks ago.
The purse bid was eventually won by GYM almost three weeks ago.
Anyway, thank you for changing the thread topic to discuss something that we all knew about a month or so ago. It's sometimes quite useful to be reminded of old news.
I already mentioned why I got it wrong, I admitted my mistake.
However this fight was confirmed at the time I wrote this thread. It was in negotiation but there was substantial rumours that the fight may not take place with stumbling blocks in place.
Now the fight is confirmed with a date announced.
So, now we're both wrong.
The reason for me wearing the trousers in this relationship is, I'm man enough to admit when I was wrong, where as you're not.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Barrera vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
It's good to know that me correcting your mistakes helped you feel like a "man", after realising you were wrong.TheGingerBomber wrote:Was just a little something to lighten the mood, you're clearly a bit angry, why can't we all get along? After all you must be highly religious with a name like that.Enlightened-One wrote:That joke or insult (whatever you were trying to achieve), makes as much sense as your "Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED" thread title... that you've since changed!TheGingerBomber wrote:
I suppose somebody has to wear the pants in this relationship!
By the way, Barrera agreed to participate in the IBF's title eliminator against Beterbiev on the 20th January, which was more than four weeks ago.
The purse bid was eventually won by GYM almost three weeks ago.
Anyway, thank you for changing the thread topic to discuss something that we all knew about a month or so ago. It's sometimes quite useful to be reminded of old news.
I already mentioned why I got it wrong, I admitted my mistake.
However this fight was confirmed at the time I wrote this thread. It was in negotiation but there was substantial rumours that the fight may not take place with stumbling blocks in place.
Now the fight is confirmed with a date announced.
So, now we're both wrong.
The reason for me wearing the trousers in this relationship is, I'm man enough to admit when I was wrong, where as you're not.
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Barrera vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
I was corrected before you came along, and with less hostility too! But I'll forgive you.Enlightened-One wrote:It's good to know that me correcting your mistakes helped you feel like a "man", after realising you were wrong.TheGingerBomber wrote:Was just a little something to lighten the mood, you're clearly a bit angry, why can't we all get along? After all you must be highly religious with a name like that.Enlightened-One wrote: That joke or insult (whatever you were trying to achieve), makes as much sense as your "Alvarez vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED" thread title... that you've since changed!
By the way, Barrera agreed to participate in the IBF's title eliminator against Beterbiev on the 20th January, which was more than four weeks ago.
The purse bid was eventually won by GYM almost three weeks ago.
Anyway, thank you for changing the thread topic to discuss something that we all knew about a month or so ago. It's sometimes quite useful to be reminded of old news.
I already mentioned why I got it wrong, I admitted my mistake.
However this fight was confirmed at the time I wrote this thread. It was in negotiation but there was substantial rumours that the fight may not take place with stumbling blocks in place.
Now the fight is confirmed with a date announced.
So, now we're both wrong.
The reason for me wearing the trousers in this relationship is, I'm man enough to admit when I was wrong, where as you're not.
Re: Barrera vs Beterbiev CONFIRMED
Another excellent addition to what is shaping up to be a strong first half of the boxing year.