Pure Robbery!
Pure Robbery!
OMG! Outright garbage officials!
Last edited by bnovelist on 19 Mar 2017, 00:58, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Pure Robbery!
Those calling it a robbery probably didnt give GGG enough credit for his jab, and probably gave DJ too much for those flashy but often inaccurate flurries
Re: Pure Robbery!
Anyone remember the last fight that went to a decision where some idiot wasn't calling it a robbery?
Re: Pure Robbery!
great great fight I LOVE BOXING
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101591
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Pure Robbery!
JACOBS missed an awful lot of punches.. GGG outworked him when it came to jabs...
-
Andrew Kearney
- Middleweight
- Posts: 369
- Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 15:32
Re: Pure Robbery!
You do realize GGG significantly outlanded Jacobs, and fights are scored on landed punches right?
Close fight, but GGG was the correct winner.
Close fight, but GGG was the correct winner.
Re: Pure Robbery!
The world has too many knee jerk morons mate, it's just the way it isTheDarkDestroyer wrote:Anyone remember the last fight that went to a decision where some idiot wasn't calling it a robbery?
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9011
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Pure Robbery!
It's farcical when folk call close fights, robberies.TheDarkDestroyer wrote:Anyone remember the last fight that went to a decision where some idiot wasn't calling it a robbery?
A robbery is a fighter has clearly won a bout but does not get the decision; a fight like Pernell Whitaker v Julio Cesar Chavez, for example, not a fight like this.
Re: Pure Robbery!
No way Glolovkin won that fight, all the excuses are nothing but nut hugging rubbish...along with a won purse.
Re: Pure Robbery!
He did win though, fair and squareFreedom wrote:No way Glolovkin won that fight, all the excuses are nothing but nut hugging rubbish...along with a won purse.
Maybe learn to score a jab and not to be so blinded by flashy flurries
Re: Pure Robbery!
Lol GGG clearly won
Re: Pure Robbery!
I had Jacobs winning 3 rounds in fight. Judges can't see GGG's jackhammer jab. Look at punch stats idiot. I hope it gets GGG more fights so good.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Pure Robbery!
Bnov is REALLY good at trolling.
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Pure Robbery!
This 100%crusader wrote:Those calling it a robbery probably didnt give GGG enough credit for his jab, and probably gave DJ too much for those flashy but often inaccurate flurries
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Pure Robbery!
Nope, close fight that could have gone either way, but I think the right man got the nod.Freedom wrote:No way Glolovkin won that fight, all the excuses are nothing but nut hugging rubbish...along with a won purse.
-
nuthin4sumpthin
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 19 Jun 2015, 19:30
Re: Pure Robbery!
Jacobs didn't get KO'd...so he won lol
Re: Pure Robbery!
Not just a robbery, but a Pure Robbery
Close fight, but hardly Jones Jnr in Korea
Close fight, but hardly Jones Jnr in Korea
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Pure Robbery!
I won money on GGG but I feel ashamed that I nearly gave the money back
nearly Jacobs is the man at Middleweight with out doubt 
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: Pure Robbery!
With posts like that, showing you don't know how do score a fight, I hope people don't think you are me (my username on a couple of sites is Freedom).Freedom wrote:No way Glolovkin won that fight, all the excuses are nothing but nut hugging rubbish...along with a won purse.
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Pure Robbery!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-dRDOQrbgE
It was no robbery, it was actually a very well judged fight. Jacobs was excellent and his stock should rise hugely as a result, but to the eyes of many/most, he didn't do enough to win the fight. Watch the video and you'll see the opinion of a respected YouTube boxing poster who put money on Jacobs to win, but thought the 115-112 card to GGG was about right. Dwyer is an African American who was pulling for a Jacobs win, yet he saw it as a close but clear win to GGG.
It was no robbery, it was actually a very well judged fight. Jacobs was excellent and his stock should rise hugely as a result, but to the eyes of many/most, he didn't do enough to win the fight. Watch the video and you'll see the opinion of a respected YouTube boxing poster who put money on Jacobs to win, but thought the 115-112 card to GGG was about right. Dwyer is an African American who was pulling for a Jacobs win, yet he saw it as a close but clear win to GGG.