Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

horndawg80
Cruiserweight
Posts: 486
Joined: 26 Apr 2011, 00:25

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by horndawg80 »

Jamie is signing for Fast Eddie then. Great result that is.....
No longer listed as one of Frank's boxers
I think it is common knowledge now that he smashed Degale up in sparring before the Bute fight
no1man
Welterweight
Posts: 244
Joined: 05 Aug 2015, 11:41

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by no1man »

horndawg80 wrote:Jamie is signing for Fast Eddie then. Great result that is.....
No longer listed as one of Frank's boxers
I think it is common knowledge now that he smashed Degale up in sparring before the Bute fight
Is this confirmed? I know there was an announcement due this week but nothing has come as far as iv seen?
horndawg80
Cruiserweight
Posts: 486
Joined: 26 Apr 2011, 00:25

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by horndawg80 »

In the next couple of weeks apparently. I heard it from a couple of lads on the White Collar scene.

I've heard the Degale story a few times now. Apparently they are mates though
no1man
Welterweight
Posts: 244
Joined: 05 Aug 2015, 11:41

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by no1man »

\he said he was announcing some big news this week, but seems to have been delayed, yeah him and degale are mates from the ams, hope if true Eddie can put him in some meaningful fights and we can find out how good he is.

The winner of Fielding-Ryder has been ordered to fight him but would like to see him out before that.
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16796
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by skanksta »

He's got a punchers chance of catching someone cold in the first two rounds - but that's about it.
Smith, Groves and even Fielding would be very short favourites.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by ste1983 »

Signing for Eddie after FW brought him back and stuck patiently by him through all his stupidness outside the ring really shows a distinct lack of loyalty. Guess thats boxing!
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10150
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by samwbr »

ste1983 wrote:Signing for Eddie after FW brought him back and stuck patiently by him through all his stupidness outside the ring really shows a distinct lack of loyalty. Guess thats boxing!
Seems to struggle to get fights. Maybe Hearn can change that, be interesting to see how they promote him and if they gloss over his personal life issues.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by ste1983 »

samwbr wrote:
ste1983 wrote:Signing for Eddie after FW brought him back and stuck patiently by him through all his stupidness outside the ring really shows a distinct lack of loyalty. Guess thats boxing!
Seems to struggle to get fights. Maybe Hearn can change that, be interesting to see how they promote him and if they gloss over his personal life issues.
Think he struggles because they seem to want to jump straight to world level when hes not beat anybody of note at smw. Needs a good domestic level win.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by Wales »

ste1983 wrote:
samwbr wrote:
ste1983 wrote:Signing for Eddie after FW brought him back and stuck patiently by him through all his stupidness outside the ring really shows a distinct lack of loyalty. Guess thats boxing!
Seems to struggle to get fights. Maybe Hearn can change that, be interesting to see how they promote him and if they gloss over his personal life issues.
Think he struggles because they seem to want to jump straight to world level when hes not beat anybody of note at smw. Needs a good domestic level win.
Can't blame them seeing some of the fighters who get world title shots nowadays.

Artur Akakov against BJS... wtf

Must be a lot of HWs looking at Hughie Fury
veriton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1598
Joined: 20 Dec 2009, 07:35

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by veriton »

warren seemed to have him fairly busy until he decided to start pummelling pole dancers in his free time.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by maverick23 »

veriton wrote:warren seemed to have him fairly busy until he decided to start pummelling pole dancers in his free time.
He might have been fairly busy but he hasn't had a meaningful fight since Sai which was 6 years ago. Some of the inactivity will be self inflicted but even still he should have matched better.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by Andrew »

Naandrew wrote:The guy he last fought was lost to Jimmy Kelly two weight divisions below. Jimmy I would say is at area/English title level.

You would think if Cox was as good as people have said he would blast an opponent of that standard out.

If he fights an opponent of some level I will take notice. But talk of him threatening the likes of Groves, Eubank etc is just daft.
Was going to post again but realised I said this a few weeks ago.

It's staggering how over hyped Cox is on here ,particularly his power, after blasting out a few Eastern European no hopers.

If he does what Callum Smith did to fielding then I will take notice.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by crusader »

Naandrew wrote:
Naandrew wrote:The guy he last fought was lost to Jimmy Kelly two weight divisions below. Jimmy I would say is at area/English title level.

You would think if Cox was as good as people have said he would blast an opponent of that standard out.

If he fights an opponent of some level I will take notice. But talk of him threatening the likes of Groves, Eubank etc is just daft.
Was going to post again but realised I said this a few weeks ago.

It's staggering how over hyped Cox is on here ,particularly his power, after blasting out a few Eastern European no hopers.

If he does what Callum Smith did to fielding then I will take notice.
Seems like a few on here know him personally....

He hasn't beaten one good opponent as a pro, and is going on 31...
veriton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1598
Joined: 20 Dec 2009, 07:35

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by veriton »

maverick23 wrote:
veriton wrote:warren seemed to have him fairly busy until he decided to start pummelling pole dancers in his free time.
He might have been fairly busy but he hasn't had a meaningful fight since Sai which was 6 years ago. Some of the inactivity will be self inflicted but even still he should have matched better.
you reckon? he looked absolutely terrible in his last fight and he had been hoovering up WBO brownie points. cox's problems seem to be largely of his own doing.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by Andrew »

crusader wrote:
Naandrew wrote:
Naandrew wrote:The guy he last fought was lost to Jimmy Kelly two weight divisions below. Jimmy I would say is at area/English title level.

You would think if Cox was as good as people have said he would blast an opponent of that standard out.

If he fights an opponent of some level I will take notice. But talk of him threatening the likes of Groves, Eubank etc is just daft.
Was going to post again but realised I said this a few weeks ago.

It's staggering how over hyped Cox is on here ,particularly his power, after blasting out a few Eastern European no hopers.

If he does what Callum Smith did to fielding then I will take notice.
Seems like a few on here know him personally....

He hasn't beaten one good opponent as a pro, and is going on 31...
I'm not saying he is rubbish either. No one has any idea until he fights a legitimate opponent.
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by maley1984 »

Talkischeap wrote:
Naandrew wrote:
crusader wrote:
Seems like a few on here know him personally....

He hasn't beaten one good opponent as a pro, and is going on 31...
I'm not saying he is rubbish either. No one has any idea until he fights a legitimate opponent.
Agreed that's all Jamie wants is to fight the best guys out there NOW



Has jamie signed to matchroom.. if not I hope he still fights the winner of fielding ryder
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by bripez »

Talkischeap wrote:
Naandrew wrote:
crusader wrote:
Seems like a few on here know him personally....

He hasn't beaten one good opponent as a pro, and is going on 31...
I'm not saying he is rubbish either. No one has any idea until he fights a legitimate opponent.
Agreed that's all Jamie wants is to fight the best guys out there NOW
So what's been stopping by him - he has been a pro for 10 years
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by Finn »

I have to say I don't recall Jamie Cox.
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2730
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by SAPFO »

An ex-Brit champ once told me this lad hits very hard. Harder than the record suggests. Hopefully he can get in the mix and show us what he can do.
horndawg80
Cruiserweight
Posts: 486
Joined: 26 Apr 2011, 00:25

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by horndawg80 »

Come on Sapfo, don't be shy... Give us a clue. Which ex British champ? Apparently he was jet lagged as well when he sparred Degale. JDG was only being kept up by the ropes when Jim Mc called it off.

I'm going to get down to Chelmsley Wood and see Cox training...
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by Deserter »

Sadly is always going to be a case of 'what could have been...'
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2730
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by SAPFO »

horndawg80 wrote:Come on Sapfo, don't be shy... Give us a clue. Which ex British champ? Apparently he was jet lagged as well when he sparred Degale. JDG was only being kept up by the ropes when Jim Mc called it off.

I'm going to get down to Chelmsley Wood and see Cox training...
You won't be too far away from him if you go down the Wood ;-)
stu 27
Super Welterweight
Posts: 174
Joined: 06 Aug 2014, 17:18

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by stu 27 »

Did he used to work for BT?
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by Fitzy901 »

Been told from a reliable source he bingoed Degale in sparring. The same guy only George Groves hits harder out of all the 12 stone fighters he has sparred which include Arthur Abraham.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Eubank Vs Jamie Cox

Post by leejonesjnr »

He's in a difficult position and sometimes does himself no favours too I guess.
His life outside the ring has caused some long delays between contests and whilst he hasn't had any 'big name' opponents, he has dispatched those that he has faced brutally enough to be on the wrong side of the risk reward equation for many to want to face him.
I think I've said it before but when he went up to SM I thought that was a dreadful decision given his former much lighter weight, but he has looked like a killer at 168.
How far is he from a WBO mandatory position?
Post Reply