Jacobs up by a point. I had him winning 7 rounds to 5 but lost a 10-8 in the knockdown round.Freedom2013 wrote:I haven't seen it yet, but will as soon as possible.
Looks like most media people scored it close with GGG winning.
What did you think?
Horse wrote:Jacobs landed and threw more power punches overall.
Jacobs landed more power shots in 8 rounds and also threw more power shots in 8 rounds.
If you love poxy jabs then maybe Golovkin deserved the win.
Golovkin excelled at anything during that fight?Ian1973 wrote:It isn't all about power it's about quality and scoring shots which Golovkin excelled in compared to Jacobs.
Mayweather regularly got out-landed in power punches?Ian1973 wrote:If it was all about power Mayweather would've barely won a fight.
Where does Rawling commentate? Can't have been worse than Barry on Box-Nation!Freedom2013 wrote:I just watched the fight, scored it 115-112 for Golovkin.
It was a fair decision.
John Rawling's commentary was terrible.
He's on allegedly and their commentary was fine.Ruthless-RKO wrote:Where does Rawling commentate? Can't have been worse than Barry on Box-Nation!
Because it is a weak punch.crusader wrote:They also had GGG landing more jabs in every round, which matches what I saw. Jabs don't get oohs and ahhs though...
I am guessing Jacobs' face swelled due to some health condition, because Golovkin's jabs were weak.Horse wrote:Because it is a weak punch.crusader wrote:They also had GGG landing more jabs in every round, which matches what I saw. Jabs don't get oohs and ahhs though...
Danny's "landed" "power punches" inflicted significantly less damage in 12 rounds than WW Brook in 5.You clearly love open hand slaps more than stiff jabs.Horse wrote:Jacobs landed and threw more power punches overall.
Jacobs landed more power shots in 8 rounds and also threw more power shots in 8 rounds.
If you love poxy jabs then maybe Golovkin deserved the win.
If Golovkin's jabs were so good then why couldn't he follow up with more power shots?boxing_rocks wrote:You clearly love open hand slaps more than stiff jabs.
Ha-ha-ha. Nice job of clowning: getting dropped, having his own face swollen and losing by two rounds.Horse wrote:If Golovkin's jabs were so good then why couldn't he follow up with more power shots?boxing_rocks wrote:You clearly love open hand slaps more than stiff jabs.
Jacobs clowned Golovkin.
He made a monkey of Golovkin.boxing_rocks wrote:Ha-ha-ha. Nice job of clowning: getting dropped, having his own face swollen and losing by two rounds.
Keep whining. When Jacobs learns to land shots, he may beat somebody of Golovkin's level.Horse wrote:He made a monkey of Golovkin.boxing_rocks wrote:Ha-ha-ha. Nice job of clowning: getting dropped, having his own face swollen and losing by two rounds.
Golovkin has been exposed.
Jacobs was the superior fighter on the night.
He already has.boxing_rocks wrote:Keep whining. When Jacobs learns to land shots, he may beat somebody of Golovkin's level.
Can't tell if you're trolling or really just that much of a contrarian that loves to argue but like the other poster said, getting dropped and fighting off the back foot getting stuck with jabs most of the night isn't what I would call clowning. I'm gonna go ahead and say golovkin fought a good fighter who had a significant size and speed advantage that kept him honest and not able to close the show. It was a close fight. If you had Jacob's winning that's fine, I can respect that. But saying he clowned ggg is going a bit overboard and I honestly don't think this is the beginning of the end for ggg.Horse wrote:He made a monkey of Golovkin.boxing_rocks wrote:Ha-ha-ha. Nice job of clowning: getting dropped, having his own face swollen and losing by two rounds.
Golovkin has been exposed.
Jacobs was the superior fighter on the night.
Yet you had pitter-patter, air jabbing McDonnell beating SolisHorse wrote:Because it is a weak punch.crusader wrote:They also had GGG landing more jabs in every round, which matches what I saw. Jabs don't get oohs and ahhs though...
Freedom2013 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDP8qnd ... youtu.be&a
You watched the first rd three times alright; but IT WAS THE WRONG FIGHTClivePatrickLyons wrote:
Listen mate watched round 1 three times all up in slow motion go do the same and be real round 1 was a toss of the coin that's the truth but all the judges gave GGG that round.