Lomachenko vs Sosa WBA title

Post Reply
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Lomachenko vs Sosa WBA title

Post by Cent0089 »

hello, according to boxrec, Sosa´s WBA title is not on the line in this fight. Is it true ?
Top
T.M.K
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 679
Joined: 15 Feb 2006, 18:28

Re: Lomachenko vs Sosa WBA title

Post by T.M.K »

Sosa gave-up his WBA title a few weeks back, leaving Corrales as the sole WBA champion at the weight....

"T.M.K"
Top
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Lomachenko vs Sosa WBA title

Post by Cent0089 »

Becoming undisputed champ is almost impossible in these days.....
Top
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Lomachenko vs Sosa WBA title

Post by Cent0089 »

i am curious who will Loma fight this year after Sosa fight (if he beat him of course) :box: :box: :box: Berchelt, Davis and COrrales have other belts right?
Top
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Lomachenko vs Sosa WBA title

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Cent0089 wrote:hello, according to boxrec, Sosa´s WBA title is not on the line in this fight. Is it true ?
You can't do a unification with an interim/jr/etc..Belt.
Top
craigjenkins05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 477
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03

Re: Lomachenko vs Sosa WBA title

Post by craigjenkins05 »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Cent0089 wrote:hello, according to boxrec, Sosa´s WBA title is not on the line in this fight. Is it true ?
You can't do a unification with an interim/jr/etc..Belt.
Didn't GGG unify when he fought Marco Antonio Rubio for the interim WBC though?

Sure there are examples with the WBA Too as I remember Hearn telling Carl frampton he was wrong about the WBA not sanctioning his and quiggs fight as a unification because quigg had the regular title and Hearn stating they had done it before, didn't matter in the end as they elevated quigg to super champ though
Top
klitoris
Super Welterweight
Posts: 927
Joined: 29 Sep 2014, 18:16

Re: Lomachenko vs Sosa WBA title

Post by klitoris »

craigjenkins05 wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Cent0089 wrote:hello, according to boxrec, Sosa´s WBA title is not on the line in this fight. Is it true ?
You can't do a unification with an interim/jr/etc..Belt.
Didn't GGG unify when he fought Marco Antonio Rubio for the interim WBC though?

Sure there are examples with the WBA Too as I remember Hearn telling Carl frampton he was wrong about the WBA not sanctioning his and quiggs fight as a unification because quigg had the regular title and Hearn stating they had done it before, didn't matter in the end as they elevated quigg to super champ though
The problem here is the WBO. Some sanctioning bodies allow you to do unifications with Interims or Regular Champs. WBO doesn't let you do unifications vs those type of "champs". Perfect example is when Kameda had to drop his belt to fight that british fighter for his WBA Regular.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Current Scene”