Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
I heard it here first: http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=210733
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Horse wrote:I heard it here first: http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=210733
I meant in the Metro Horse. Its big news. Honest.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
bar klitschko
more competitive fight than boring aj has ever been in
more competitive fight than boring aj has ever been in
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Actually Horse i refer back to my original post.
You heard it here first.
You heard it here first.
-
watsupdoc87
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
WAR FURY hail the return of the gypsy king who has returned to reclaim what is rightfully his 
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
talk all the sh*t you want about fury's shape
he could pick a lot more easier fights for his come back
talk of fury's shape doesn't really matter anyway, when he's on the ball he will give any current HW a boxing lesson
he could pick a lot more easier fights for his come back
talk of fury's shape doesn't really matter anyway, when he's on the ball he will give any current HW a boxing lesson
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
I did?mimmy123 wrote:Actually Horse i refer back to my original post.
You heard it here first.
Oops, my mistake.
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Horse wrote:I did?mimmy123 wrote:Actually Horse i refer back to my original post.
You heard it here first.
Oops, my mistake.
No worries Horse. I dont tent to look at CS very much so if i had seen it over there i wouldnt have posted it up.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Has this been confirmed or is it just 2 boxers saying they will fight each other?
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
nitro5912 wrote:Has this been confirmed or is it just 2 boxers saying they will fight each other?
I think what you have said sums it up. It wont come off certainly not in the uk if Fury is suspended.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Its all about opinion and aj would smash fat furyOiky wrote:bar klitschko
more competitive fight than boring aj has ever been in
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
100% all about opinionthechump wrote:Its all about opinion and aj would smash fat furyOiky wrote:bar klitschko
more competitive fight than boring aj has ever been in
aj wouldln't land a glove on tyson
tyson would be giving him different looks all night, pot shotting, racking up the points, feinting, creating angles, presenting joshua with more problems than enough and tiring out that big musclebound frame.
not disputing he could knock tyson out, but in my opinion tyson would be too good for him and show him levels. powers uselss if you can't land a clean shot.
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Oiky wrote:100% all about opinionthechump wrote:Its all about opinion and aj would smash fat furyOiky wrote:bar klitschko
more competitive fight than boring aj has ever been in![]()
aj wouldln't land a glove on tyson
tyson would be giving him different looks all night, pot shotting, racking up the points, feinting, creating angles, presenting joshua with more problems than enough and tiring out that big musclebound frame.
not disputing he could knock tyson out, but in my opinion tyson would be too good for him and show him levels. powers uselss if you can't land a clean shot.
Effing hell Fury sounds like a young Cassius Clay. Is he still floating like a butterfly and stinging like a bee?
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Haha floatin like a led zepplin ya mean hamimmy123 wrote:Oiky wrote:100% all about opinionthechump wrote: Its all about opinion and aj would smash fat fury![]()
aj wouldln't land a glove on tyson
tyson would be giving him different looks all night, pot shotting, racking up the points, feinting, creating angles, presenting joshua with more problems than enough and tiring out that big musclebound frame.
not disputing he could knock tyson out, but in my opinion tyson would be too good for him and show him levels. powers uselss if you can't land a clean shot.
Effing hell Fury sounds like a young Cassius Clay. Is he still floating like a butterfly and stinging like a bee?
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
tysons no clay, never said he was
different era's people, different levels altogether
tysons no clay, and joshuas no lewis, HWs of days gone by are a different breed so its nonsense to bring that into it
i'm saying in this era, fury boxes joshuas head off
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
I cant quote what you said about Fury as im on my phone but ive never seen Fury fight as you say. You are making him sound something he isnt. I wouldnt class Fury as a talented boxer. Fury won the title yes i know that, that was a great thing but he beat someone who never threw a meaningful punch. Fury was lucky that night. But he won, hats off. Lets see how Jushua deals with Klit.Oiky wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
tysons no clay, never said he was
different era's people, different levels altogether
tysons no clay, and joshuas no lewis, HWs of days gone by are a different breed so its nonsense to bring that into it
i'm saying in this era, fury boxes joshuas head off
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
maybe tyson never boxed how i described above in every fight. but against klitschko and hammer he did (not saying hammer is an overly credible win either) but it proves how he can box when he wants to and he is a far better boxer than ajmimmy123 wrote:I cant quote what you said about Fury as im on my phone but ive never seen Fury fight as you say. You are making him sound something he isnt. I wouldnt class Fury as a talented boxer. Fury won the title yes i know that, that was a great thing but he beat someone who never threw a meaningful punch. Fury was lucky that night. But he won, hats off. Lets see how Jushua deals with Klit.Oiky wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
tysons no clay, never said he was
different era's people, different levels altogether
tysons no clay, and joshuas no lewis, HWs of days gone by are a different breed so its nonsense to bring that into it
i'm saying in this era, fury boxes joshuas head off
for tysons size he is a hell of a mover and can box really well. personally i don't believe fury was lucky, but there you go thats just me. don't think klitschko threw a meaningful punch because he wasn't sure what ever to do with fury, fury nullified him completely. he fought a fight where klitschko was unsure how to approach it, klitschko wasn't so gun shy vs. pulev was he, b/c pulev fought a fight klitschko could time and work out, a fight he was comfortable with. had nothing to do in my opinion with tyson being lucky, he just took klitschko out of his comfort zone and him and his corner didn't know what to do.
think joshua will spark klitschko, and i don't think this outcome with rubbish the victory tyson had at all, but would like to see klitschko win, sick of joshuas stay humble act
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
I think talk of Joshua v Fury needs to be tempered by seeing what sort of form Fury shows if/when he comes back. He's spent coming up for a year and a half telling people (and looking like) an obese, drug-addled mess, whilst Joshua has been taking reasonably average fights, (but still largely what would be expected for a guy who has had less than twenty contests) in the build up to Wlad and looking in good form.
Anyway, does this actually have any substance? Last thing Tyson had on the record seemed to be that he was back in the ring four weeks this Saturday. Tickets strangely yet to go on sale...
Anyway, does this actually have any substance? Last thing Tyson had on the record seemed to be that he was back in the ring four weeks this Saturday. Tickets strangely yet to go on sale...
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Oiky wrote:maybe tyson never boxed how i described above in every fight. but against klitschko and hammer he did (not saying hammer is an overly credible win either) but it proves how he can box when he wants to and he is a far better boxer than ajmimmy123 wrote:I cant quote what you said about Fury as im on my phone but ive never seen Fury fight as you say. You are making him sound something he isnt. I wouldnt class Fury as a talented boxer. Fury won the title yes i know that, that was a great thing but he beat someone who never threw a meaningful punch. Fury was lucky that night. But he won, hats off. Lets see how Jushua deals with Klit.Oiky wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
tysons no clay, never said he was
different era's people, different levels altogether
tysons no clay, and joshuas no lewis, HWs of days gone by are a different breed so its nonsense to bring that into it
i'm saying in this era, fury boxes joshuas head off
for tysons size he is a hell of a mover and can box really well. personally i don't believe fury was lucky, but there you go thats just me. don't think klitschko threw a meaningful punch because he wasn't sure what ever to do with fury, fury nullified him completely. he fought a fight where klitschko was unsure how to approach it, klitschko wasn't so gun shy vs. pulev was he, b/c pulev fought a fight klitschko could time and work out, a fight he was comfortable with. had nothing to do in my opinion with tyson being lucky, he just took klitschko out of his comfort zone and him and his corner didn't know what to do.
think joshua will spark klitschko, and i don't think this outcome with rubbish the victory tyson had at all, but would like to see klitschko win, sick of joshuas stay humble act
Fury did what he had to to win against Klit, im not taking that away from him. He deserved the win but in terms of wins it was bloody poor, but a wins a win end of. I agree i think AJ will knock out Klit as i think the Fury fight was the showing of a man turning old that night. I dont think AJ will have a hard night, he will possibly make it harder than it actually is by showing respect rather than bulldoze in and end it early. I just think Klits time is over and the new generation are here.
Fury? I think we saw the best of him on the night of Klit and i would imagine at some point in the future he will cash in on a title shot but if its against AJ he will come unstuck. AJ is learning and fighting while Fury is stagnating.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
yeah aj will probably drag it out a few rounds, i can see that happening. i think fury can perform like that again, but you are right when you say he isn't allowing hismelf to sstay fresh at all by being out of the game at the minute.mimmy123 wrote:Oiky wrote:maybe tyson never boxed how i described above in every fight. but against klitschko and hammer he did (not saying hammer is an overly credible win either) but it proves how he can box when he wants to and he is a far better boxer than ajmimmy123 wrote:
I cant quote what you said about Fury as im on my phone but ive never seen Fury fight as you say. You are making him sound something he isnt. I wouldnt class Fury as a talented boxer. Fury won the title yes i know that, that was a great thing but he beat someone who never threw a meaningful punch. Fury was lucky that night. But he won, hats off. Lets see how Jushua deals with Klit.
for tysons size he is a hell of a mover and can box really well. personally i don't believe fury was lucky, but there you go thats just me. don't think klitschko threw a meaningful punch because he wasn't sure what ever to do with fury, fury nullified him completely. he fought a fight where klitschko was unsure how to approach it, klitschko wasn't so gun shy vs. pulev was he, b/c pulev fought a fight klitschko could time and work out, a fight he was comfortable with. had nothing to do in my opinion with tyson being lucky, he just took klitschko out of his comfort zone and him and his corner didn't know what to do.
think joshua will spark klitschko, and i don't think this outcome with rubbish the victory tyson had at all, but would like to see klitschko win, sick of joshuas stay humble act
Fury did what he had to to win against Klit, im not taking that away from him. He deserved the win but in terms of wins it was bloody poor, but a wins a win end of. I agree i think AJ will knock out Klit as i think the Fury fight was the showing of a man turning old that night. I dont think AJ will have a hard night, he will possibly make it harder than it actually is by showing respect rather than bulldoze in and end it early. I just think Klits time is over and the new generation are here.
Fury? I think we saw the best of him on the night of Klit and i would imagine at some point in the future he will cash in on a title shot but if its against AJ he will come unstuck. AJ is learning and fighting while Fury is stagnating.
we'll see what happens in the future, joshua learning yes, but i still think tyson would win if he is back within a year but his chances of that obviously aren't helped at all the longer he is out of the sport
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
FFs he still hasn't been charged or cleared of three anti doping violations people need to calm down about his comeback.
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Naandrew wrote:FFs he still hasn't been charged or cleared of three anti doping violations people need to calm down about his comeback.
If not by bbboc it will be by some other body if Fury wishes to box on regardless of the doping.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
He can't as they are all affiliated and under WADA rules. Peter said this in his last IFl interview a few weeks back.mimmy123 wrote:Naandrew wrote:FFs he still hasn't been charged or cleared of three anti doping violations people need to calm down about his comeback.
If not by bbboc it will be by some other body if Fury wishes to box on regardless of the doping.
He said Tyson was cleared of the doping charges and that the only thing outstanding was when he told testers to F*ck off and refused a drugs test.
However UKAD have NOT publicly cleared him of anything.
I said on another thread that if Peter was telling the truth then I reckon Tyson will be banned until September 2018.
A cyclist as part of the BBC investigation into doping in cycling got two years for refusing a test. If you refuse a test your refuse a test.
Not having a go it's just people are ignoring the facts out there and being unrealistic.
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Fair play.Naandrew wrote:He can't as they are all affiliated and under WADA rules. Peter said this in his last IFl interview a few weeks back.mimmy123 wrote:Naandrew wrote:FFs he still hasn't been charged or cleared of three anti doping violations people need to calm down about his comeback.
If not by bbboc it will be by some other body if Fury wishes to box on regardless of the doping.
He said Tyson was cleared of the doping charges and that the only thing outstanding was when he told testers to F*ck off and refused a drugs test.
However UKAD have NOT publicly cleared him of anything.
I said on another thread that if Peter was telling the truth then I reckon Tyson will be banned until September 2018.
A cyclist as part of the BBC investigation into doping in cycling got two years for refusing a test. If you refuse a test your refuse a test.
Not having a go it's just people are ignoring the facts out there and being unrealistic.