Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Extremely strong division at domestic level, but at world? Well the proof is in some of the names, John Molina Jnr no.4 according to BoxRec.
In the top 40 Britain have 6 fighters, 1 in the top 10, Ricky Burns. Others in top 30 are Ohara, Davies Jnr, Nurse & Catterall.
Whilst they're all solid fighters, Nurse is still British champ! And he's in the top 20 I believe. I'm only going off of boxrec like I say, but it's telling!
Crawford has seemingly no competition, Postol is possibly the best of the rest, there's a lot of good prospects away from the British bunch that may set the division on fire, such as Orozco, Lipinets, Baranchyk & Ulysses.
It's in a weird transition period that has Burns or Indongo as a unified champ!
What you's think of this division, I'm personally just hoping we get the domestic dust ups we crave, like Catterall vs Nurse, Ohara vs Taylor, etc.
In the top 40 Britain have 6 fighters, 1 in the top 10, Ricky Burns. Others in top 30 are Ohara, Davies Jnr, Nurse & Catterall.
Whilst they're all solid fighters, Nurse is still British champ! And he's in the top 20 I believe. I'm only going off of boxrec like I say, but it's telling!
Crawford has seemingly no competition, Postol is possibly the best of the rest, there's a lot of good prospects away from the British bunch that may set the division on fire, such as Orozco, Lipinets, Baranchyk & Ulysses.
It's in a weird transition period that has Burns or Indongo as a unified champ!
What you's think of this division, I'm personally just hoping we get the domestic dust ups we crave, like Catterall vs Nurse, Ohara vs Taylor, etc.
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Strange the way things have panned out in this division but I still think it's a decent division to be fair. Broner and Crawford make it a good division.
-
darkstar81
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 390
- Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Straw weight
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
I forgot Diaz who I like, but I'd wonder what would happen if he fought Postol who's massiveStuarty30 wrote:Strange the way things have panned out in this division but I still think it's a decent division to be fair. Broner and Crawford make it a good division.
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Battle of the jabs against Postol.TheGingerBomber wrote:I forgot Diaz who I like, but I'd wonder what would happen if he fought Postol who's massiveStuarty30 wrote:Strange the way things have panned out in this division but I still think it's a decent division to be fair. Broner and Crawford make it a good division.
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
yeah no name fighters to prop it up, superfly is the poster division for the lower weightsdarkstar81 wrote:Straw weight
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
If Broner is the best the division has to offer, I would argue the oppositeStuarty30 wrote:Strange the way things have panned out in this division but I still think it's a decent division to be fair. Broner and Crawford make it a good division.
Crawford is a p4p contender, If he steps up to WW, which I'm surprised he hasn't, then it's a pretty dire division
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
140 is a good example of what happenes when a strong fighter comes along and cleans up the division. Crawford has noone to fight.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Heavyweight
-
HyacinthusTurnipseed
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: 11 Dec 2010, 16:34
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
I think Broner is staying at Welterweight now. Though I keep hearing Barthelemy is going up to 140 (hasn't happened yet). Whatever happened to Omar Figueroa by the way?
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
we have a winner !SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Heavyweight
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
My own computer does not recognised Super Lightweight..... I'm sure Ricky Hatton wouldn't liked to be called a Super Lightweight.
-
CaptainSpacerod
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Ring have Jack Catterall ranked at 8.
Wtf.
Wtf.
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Divisions go through cycles. Crawford is p4p but there's not a lot else. He's carrying it.
When it had Bradley, Khan, Garcia etc it was a pretty competitive division with decent depth too, at the top, with the likes of Peterson, Alexander etc
When it had Bradley, Khan, Garcia etc it was a pretty competitive division with decent depth too, at the top, with the likes of Peterson, Alexander etc
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Not doubting Crawford at all but with what he has in front of him, I'm shocked he hasn't moved up yet! Especially with a Pac fight there (apparently), that makes him a star.Tarkus wrote:140 is a good example of what happenes when a strong fighter comes along and cleans up the division. Crawford has noone to fight.
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
I'm pretty sure Figueroa's last fight was at light middleweight!HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote:I think Broner is staying at Welterweight now. Though I keep hearing Barthelemy is going up to 140 (hasn't happened yet). Whatever happened to Omar Figueroa by the way?
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Apologies, I was in two minds whether I should refer to it as that or light welter, I chose wrong!stujones wrote:My own computer does not recognised Super Lightweight..... I'm sure Ricky Hatton wouldn't liked to be called a Super Lightweight.
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
That would make it solid, I just think like you say, it's in a bit of a lull at the minute, I doubt the worst division status will last long!Ossyrules wrote:Divisions go through cycles. Crawford is p4p but there's not a lot else. He's carrying it.
When it had Bradley, Khan, Garcia etc it was a pretty competitive division with decent depth too, at the top, with the likes of Peterson, Alexander etc
I don't know any straweights I don't think!
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
He was always a bit sh1t, and he never got much better?HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote: Whatever happened to Omar Figueroa by the way?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
He was injured, don't remember exactly what.a lot of pbc fighters sit around.
-
HyacinthusTurnipseed
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: 11 Dec 2010, 16:34
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Maybe he wasn't great but but he wasn't bad - would happily watch him against Broner or Lamont Peterson or test an up-and-comer like Frankie Gomez or Egidijus Kavaliauskas or someone like that.Counter-puncher wrote:He was always a bit sh1t, and he never got much better?HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote: Whatever happened to Omar Figueroa by the way?
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Figueroa has been plagued by hand issues...happens when bang Arakawa's rock head.
I think 135 is terrible my self. Linares and Garcia are class, it the rest of the division is less than inspiring, 140 ain't great
As for whoever mentions strawweight, it's a pretty strange time down there. You have two Thai's (Wanheng Menayothin and Knockout CP Freshmart) who will almost certainly not face off, Takayama has just retired. And the division has a lot of exciting talent (Fukuhara, Kyoguchi, Koura, Jerusalem,Konishi, Juarez, Buitrago,Khonco, Rojas...). Not the deepest division but a nicely poised one
I think 135 is terrible my self. Linares and Garcia are class, it the rest of the division is less than inspiring, 140 ain't great
As for whoever mentions strawweight, it's a pretty strange time down there. You have two Thai's (Wanheng Menayothin and Knockout CP Freshmart) who will almost certainly not face off, Takayama has just retired. And the division has a lot of exciting talent (Fukuhara, Kyoguchi, Koura, Jerusalem,Konishi, Juarez, Buitrago,Khonco, Rojas...). Not the deepest division but a nicely poised one
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Without Crawford there isn't much else to get excited about, but I'm sure Garcia will move up soon, and hopefully while Crawford is still there.
Some good fights domestically, whoever climbs the pile (either Davis or Taylor) could find themselves in a decent position.
Some good fights domestically, whoever climbs the pile (either Davis or Taylor) could find themselves in a decent position.
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Crawford is obviously the top dog but if he does move up (sooner the better IMO) then I'd say Broner is probably the next best guy. Don't get me wrong, I hate the little odious twerp but on his game he's a force at 140. I'd heavily favour him against Burns but if Ricky were to beat him personally it would rank amongst my best nights as a boxing fan.davie wrote:If Broner is the best the division has to offer, I would argue the oppositeStuarty30 wrote:Strange the way things have panned out in this division but I still think it's a decent division to be fair. Broner and Crawford make it a good division.
Crawford is a p4p contender, If he steps up to WW, which I'm surprised he hasn't, then it's a pretty dire division
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Agree. IF Broner gets to 140 and it's a big if with his dedication, I'd suggest he can give Crawford a competitive fight. He would be the second best guy in the division IMO.Stuarty30 wrote:Crawford is obviously the top dog but if he does move up (sooner the better IMO) then I'd say Broner is probably the next best guy. Don't get me wrong, I hate the little odious twerp but on his game he's a force at 140. I'd heavily favour him against Burns but if Ricky were to beat him personally it would rank amongst my best nights as a boxing fan.davie wrote:If Broner is the best the division has to offer, I would argue the oppositeStuarty30 wrote:Strange the way things have panned out in this division but I still think it's a decent division to be fair. Broner and Crawford make it a good division.
Crawford is a p4p contender, If he steps up to WW, which I'm surprised he hasn't, then it's a pretty dire division