Tyson Fury v Manual Charr

[Horse]

Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

Mason didn't really do anything with his career.

He is unworthy of being compared to Tyson Fury.

[Mimmy]

Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

Mason didn't really do anything with his career.

He is unworthy of being compared to Tyson Fury.

Be very careful I know some nasty people.

uploading images

[SaadOffTheDeck]

Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

Mason didn't really do anything with his career.

He is unworthy of being compared to Tyson Fury.

You're wrong.

[Horse]

You're wrong.

Not really.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

You're wrong.

Not really.

Definitely

[Horse]

Definitely

Credit should be given to those who have achieved something, rather than those that people think looked pretty good.

Fury is leagues above Mason.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

Definitely

Credit should be given to those who have achieved something, rather than those that people think looked pretty good.

Fury is leagues above Mason.

No, he isn't.

[Horse]

No, he isn't.

He is.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

No, he isn't.

He is.

No

[samwbr]

Great chat lads

[SaadOffTheDeck]

They don't get much better with horse. He's not very bright and all around unpleasant.

[BitPlayer]

Watch Mason fight, you should try that more often when discussing boxers.

I am against the "eye test", it is vastly overrated.

Fury has achieved far more than Mason ever did.

Mason does not deserve to be compared favourably to Fury.

Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including one to someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.

[Horse]

They don't get much better with horse. He's not very bright and all around unpleasant.

And you are so sophisticated and lovely.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

They don't get much better with horse. He's not very bright and all around unpleasant.

And you are so sophisticated and lovely.

Yes, you should look up to me.

[Horse]

It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing someone a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.

David Price is more of a comparison for Gary Mason.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

I am against the "eye test", it is vastly overrated.

Fury has achieved far more than Mason ever did.

Mason does not deserve to be compared favourably to Fury.

Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including one to someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.

None of that matters if they shared a ring. Biggs was as good a win as chisora. Obviously wlad is a much bigger win but it certainly wasn't a fight that screamed elite level. Quite the opposite. I don't think either wlad or fury sees 7 rounds with Lewis that night.

[crusader]

Does Mason beat Wlad too?

[SaadOffTheDeck]

Does Mason beat Wlad too?

I don't know that Mason beats fury. He could certainly beat the wlad that fury did. The guy was 40.

[BitPlayer]

Yes, every more accomplished fighter always wins.

It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including one to someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.

None of that matters if they shared a ring. Biggs was as good a win as chisora. Obviously wlad is a much bigger win but it certainly wasn't a fight that screamed elite level. Quite the opposite. I don't think either wlad or fury sees 7 rounds with Lewis that night.

Maybe the first time he beat Chisora.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including one to someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.

None of that matters if they shared a ring. Biggs was as good a win as chisora. Obviously wlad is a much bigger win but it certainly wasn't a fight that screamed elite level. Quite the opposite. I don't think either wlad or fury sees 7 rounds with Lewis that night.

Maybe the first time he beat Chisora.

Lol, though the rematch was furys best performance.

[TheGman]

So we gonna start the name calling again.

This time I wont be sending you any private messages offering olive branches. Im not stupid fella I save lives.

That's why I think that you are trolling.

So you misfit you have only just established that after over 6000 posts ive made. And many decent posts. While you, you are the biggest vile troll I know on here. Do not ever reply to me again, If you do its clear that you want me to then reply as you are the troll, you say vile nasty things to people so you get a reaction. Look up the definition of trolling. Then look at your filthy stained Y fronts.

Hahaha hirse is the ted bundy of boxrec

[TheGman]

No he wouldn't. You're all going to have to live with the fact you can't change the result. As you're a scouser, I expect you'll find that virtually impossible.

If geography is too big a word for you it means do you know areas? Cause im not a scouser im from the wirral which is not liverpool,i have the accent but not from there sorry pal and lets not turn this into manchester vs liverpool cause i have supported john and joe murray ricky hatton jamie moore michael gomez michael brodie anthony crolla etc etc so kets not say uts cause of were i am from and were fury is from cause thats not true,i also support all the liverpool boxers,i dislike tony bellew sometimes with some of the things he says but still im absolutley chuffed he has done what he set out to do in this sport and thats secure him and his families future. I also cant stand paul smith but i used to support till i seen some of the sh1te he used to put on facebook and twitter as if he is the encyclopedia of boxing.

So you're a plastic scouser? I'm surprised with your PHD in geography that you think Lancaster is in Manchester.... The people from there are about as Mancunian as you are Scouse.

Well mickey manchester is in some parts part of lancashire so it depends on who you are asking and what type of ar5e they are,if u ask say for instance horse he would say it isnt cause he just likes to say the sky is green even tho its blue. So manchester is in lancashire mick

[TheGman]

Fury isnt in the league of the Greatest. I would put Fury around the British decent fighters such as Gary Mason and thats being kind in my opinion as Fury never reached his peak or full potential.

Fury vs lewis = lewis by k.o
Fury vs bruno = bruno by k.o
Fury vs mason = mason by k.o
Fury vs herbie hide = hide points
Fury vs cooper= fury by k.o
Fury vs Henry akinwande = points win fury
Fury vs joe bugner= bugner points
Fury vs julius francis= fury k.o
Fury vs prime danny williams = williams by k.o
Fury vs joshua =joshua devastating k.o

So 2 of the hardest punching heavyweights ever, Lewis & Bruno, beat Fury by ko, but Joshua beats Fury by devastating ko? Why the difference?

Hardest punching heavyweights ever? Where do u get that info from or is it just your opinion?

[mickey1975]

And this has what to do with Lancaster?

[TheGman]

Definitely

Credit should be given to those who have achieved something, rather than those that people think looked pretty good.

Fury is leagues above Mason.

How can someone comment on boxing when all they know is tyson fury? Its like commenting on golf and all u know is tiger woods,horse do everyone a favour mate and fvck off cause u know fvck all about boxing