thechump wrote:How can someone comment on boxing when all they know is tyson fury? Its like commenting on golf and all u know is tiger woods,horse do everyone a favour mate and fvck off cause u know fvck all about boxingHorse wrote:Credit should be given to those who have achieved something, rather than those that people think looked pretty good.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Definitely
Fury is leagues above Mason.
Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32959
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Not the hardest punching heavyweights ever. But certainly up there. Obviously it is just my opinion having followed both of their careers closely, and I'd be interested to hear other people's views if they disagree.thechump wrote:Hardest punching heavyweights ever? Where do u get that info from or is it just your opinion?Boxerbeetle wrote:So 2 of the hardest punching heavyweights ever, Lewis & Bruno, beat Fury by ko, but Joshua beats Fury by devastating ko? Why the difference?thechump wrote: Fury vs lewis = lewis by k.o
Fury vs bruno = bruno by k.o
Fury vs mason = mason by k.o
Fury vs herbie hide = hide points
Fury vs cooper= fury by k.o
Fury vs Henry akinwande = points win fury
Fury vs joe bugner= bugner points
Fury vs julius francis= fury k.o
Fury vs prime danny williams = williams by k.o
Fury vs joshua =joshua devastating k.o
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Lewis fits that description, Bruno not so much.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Lewis punches harder than Joshua ever will
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
I suppose you have to understand what you're looking at before you can place Gary Mason.Horse wrote:David Price is more of a comparison for Gary Mason.BitPlayer wrote:It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing someone a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.
Comparing Chisora and Price to him makes you look pretty stupid.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
It's easier to just comment off the data base. A quick look at Bert Cooper's record won't tell you he'd put fury in the hospital on his best day.Tuan_Jim wrote:I suppose you have to understand what you're looking at before you can place Gary Mason.Horse wrote:David Price is more of a comparison for Gary Mason.BitPlayer wrote:It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing someone a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.
Comparing Chisora and Price to him makes you look pretty stupid.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
But that was before he IMPWOOOOVED!calmdown wrote:
Christ, one decent win and he's turned into a 31 stone Ray Robinson, give it a rest. Was getting his ears boxed off and floored by Steve Cunningham.
Or just, you know, looked the same but against slightly worse guys.
Last edited by Bard of Boxrec on 13 Apr 2017, 11:47, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
It wouldn't tell me that largely because he wouldn't.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:It's easier to just comment off the data base. A quick look at Bert Cooper's record won't tell you he'd put fury in the hospital on his best day.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Has Joshua not "IMPWOOOOVED" since his fight with Whyte then?Riddick Blowe wrote:But that was before he IMPWOOOOVED!
Or just, you know, looked the same but against slightly worse guys.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
What are you talking about, what Saad presented there was some solid unrefutable opinion.Horse wrote:It wouldn't tell me that largely because he wouldn't.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:It's easier to just comment off the data base. A quick look at Bert Cooper's record won't tell you he'd put fury in the hospital on his best day.
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
comparing Mason to Price is the most bizarre thing ive ever heard unless your a crack addict.Tuan_Jim wrote:I suppose you have to understand what you're looking at before you can place Gary Mason.Horse wrote:David Price is more of a comparison for Gary Mason.BitPlayer wrote:It would be different if Fury only did a little more, but you're comparing someone a lineal and unified champion to someone who won a vacant British title and defended once against someone with 3 losses including someone called Tony Tricker. Forget Fury, Chisora has achieved levels above Mason.
Comparing Chisora and Price to him makes you look pretty stupid.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Lol. The Cooper that went to war with Holy would have cleaned Fury's clock.BitPlayer wrote:What are you talking about, what Saad presented there was some solid unrefutable opinion.Horse wrote:It wouldn't tell me that largely because he wouldn't.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:It's easier to just comment off the data base. A quick look at Bert Cooper's record won't tell you he'd put fury in the hospital on his best day.
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
The only loss on Richie Melito record was to Bert Cooper. Richie was 27-1 the interesting thing about Melito though is that he only ever got past round 5 on 2 occasions in his career.Riddick Blowe wrote:Lol. The Cooper that went to war with Holy would have cleaned Fury's clock.BitPlayer wrote:What are you talking about, what Saad presented there was some solid unrefutable opinion.Horse wrote:It wouldn't tell me that largely because he wouldn't.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23132
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
None of us know anything for sure.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Lewis and joshua would k.o him viciously were as bruno would hurt him but not like a lewis or joshua,like u say its all about opinionsBoxerbeetle wrote:Not the hardest punching heavyweights ever. But certainly up there. Obviously it is just my opinion having followed both of their careers closely, and I'd be interested to hear other people's views if they disagree.thechump wrote:Hardest punching heavyweights ever? Where do u get that info from or is it just your opinion?Boxerbeetle wrote:
So 2 of the hardest punching heavyweights ever, Lewis & Bruno, beat Fury by ko, but Joshua beats Fury by devastating ko? Why the difference?
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3165
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Mason was legit. Fury would've boxed his massive noggin off for a couple of rounds, but Gary was about as game as they come, and he'd still have been there in the middle rounds. If Fury then tired, Mason'd start finding ways inside to put himself to work.
That's a fight that I definitely imagine swinging from Fury to Mason as it goes on, and if we're not talking about prime Fury then I think he'd be worn down for a TKO. Else points, with Mason as the favourite unless Fury could build up enough of an early lead to run away with.
That's a fight that I definitely imagine swinging from Fury to Mason as it goes on, and if we're not talking about prime Fury then I think he'd be worn down for a TKO. Else points, with Mason as the favourite unless Fury could build up enough of an early lead to run away with.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
What are some good Mason fights to watch to get an idea of his abilities and style? His opponents seem fairly non-descript to me, so I'm not sure what to watch aside from the Lewis fight.
What are his best three wins, and was his fight with journeyman Everett Martin really as competitive as the score suggests?
What are his best three wins, and was his fight with journeyman Everett Martin really as competitive as the score suggests?
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5460
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Mason was a solid fighter, punched hard and very tough. He lacked mobility though and speed.
I feel he is a little over rated when people look back at his career. Tough man though, no doubting that.
Would he have beaten Fury? Probably not.
I feel he is a little over rated when people look back at his career. Tough man though, no doubting that.
Would he have beaten Fury? Probably not.
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Yes, I know what you are saying but I am talking more the perception of the "average" fan that did not even know Valuev fought Holyfield.... and even if they did they wanted Haye to win, VIA ANY MEANS (even a gift of a decision), because Valuev was a black mark on the sport.BitPlayer wrote:But that all falls apart when you consider Valuev, like you said, struggled with 46 year old Holyfield, who weighed in a few pounds less than Haye did.stujones wrote:Good point re Haye - again people seem to have forgotton that this fight was again very close and could have gone either way..... in fact, I thought Valuev won.dirk2686 wrote:There are two ways of looking at the Fury Wlad fight. People who like Fury tend to focus on the result - he went away from home and did the job against an elite level, long term champion in an upset win. People who don't like Fury tend to focus on the performance, the lack of punches thrown, the very low amount landed, the lack of action.
Where the jealousy comes in is that Fury is obviously such a poorly regarded character that the reaction to the win seems overly harsh. Haye became a bit of a hero when he went away and scored a low-action, points result against Valuev, (clearly a weaker opponent than Wlad.) Fury does the same and becomes a laughing stock.
I can see both sides, but I don't think results are the be all and end all.
The key difference though I think are two fold.
1) The almost KD that Haye scored.... It was a case of David almost slaying Goliath - Fury didn't do that to the "chinny" Klitchsko.
2) Value, IMO wrongly, was perceived as being bad for boxing - a bad champion, a champion that shouldn't have got a decision vs Holyfield.... any win that knocked him out of the equation was perceived as a positive for the sport.... Not sure if the same can be said for Wlad, in fact it was rather sad to see father time catch up with a very good champion.
People thought that Haye was going to struggle against Valuev cos of the size factor.... but if (even if it is not legitimate) he wins then it lights up the heavyweight era and he will have more success against smaller heavyweights.
So I think we had a lot of interest from non-boxing fans because Valuev was a bit of a freak show and the size difference.... then we had interest from more casual boxing fans who knew that Holyfield gave him trouble and wanted Haye to beat the undeserving champion and "reignite" the division.
Klitchsko was neither a freak show or a non-deserving champion. He was fighting the best out there and seemed to be making more risks in recent years.... fighting Jennings in the states and fighting someone of Pulev's callibre. I don't think it quite had the same "good guy vs bad guy" image that Haye and Valuev got.... and quite possibly lacked the same appeal to the non-boxing fans. I don't think many in Britain particularly "willed" Fury to win, cos Klitchsko is an all round good egg and had been a great champion.... whereas Haye was "willed" to win beforehand, that the performance became secondary.
I think Joshua is in much the same situation now.... performance is going to be very important vs Klitchsko.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Agreed. He was a monstrous puncherOiky wrote:Lewis punches harder than Joshua ever will
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Mason won every round as I recall and was one of very, very few men to deck Bigfoot with a punch to the head.crusader wrote:What are some good Mason fights to watch to get an idea of his abilities and style? His opponents seem fairly non-descript to me, so I'm not sure what to watch aside from the Lewis fight.
What are his best three wins, and was his fight with journeyman Everett Martin really as competitive as the score suggests?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
Bigfoot beat Spoon, who was far greater than Wlad, much less the scrub Vitali.Tuan_Jim wrote:Mason won every round as I recall and was one of very, very few men to deck Bigfoot with a punch to the head.crusader wrote:What are some good Mason fights to watch to get an idea of his abilities and style? His opponents seem fairly non-descript to me, so I'm not sure what to watch aside from the Lewis fight.
What are his best three wins, and was his fight with journeyman Everett Martin really as competitive as the score suggests?
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
It's hard to think of an 80s heavyweight champ who wouldn't have beaten everyone Wlad defended against in this 10 year reign if dreck that has somehow established him as a Great.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Bigfoot beat Spoon, who was far greater than Wlad, much less the scrub Vitali.Tuan_Jim wrote:Mason won every round as I recall and was one of very, very few men to deck Bigfoot with a punch to the head.crusader wrote:What are some good Mason fights to watch to get an idea of his abilities and style? His opponents seem fairly non-descript to me, so I'm not sure what to watch aside from the Lewis fight.
What are his best three wins, and was his fight with journeyman Everett Martin really as competitive as the score suggests?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
I just wish he would have met even a post prime Rahman.Tuan_Jim wrote:It's hard to think of an 80s heavyweight champ who wouldn't have beaten everyone Wlad defended against in this 10 year reign if dreck that has somehow established him as a Great.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Bigfoot beat Spoon, who was far greater than Wlad, much less the scrub Vitali.Tuan_Jim wrote:
Mason won every round as I recall and was one of very, very few men to deck Bigfoot with a punch to the head.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Tyson Fury v Manual Charr
I actually think Vitali is a much better fighter than Wlad. Much more aggressive, far more punches, better chin, and better fighting instincts.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Bigfoot beat Spoon, who was far greater than Wlad, much less the scrub Vitali.Tuan_Jim wrote:Mason won every round as I recall and was one of very, very few men to deck Bigfoot with a punch to the head.crusader wrote:What are some good Mason fights to watch to get an idea of his abilities and style? His opponents seem fairly non-descript to me, so I'm not sure what to watch aside from the Lewis fight.
What are his best three wins, and was his fight with journeyman Everett Martin really as competitive as the score suggests?