Crawford would chew him up and spit him out IMOPredatorHayds wrote:Agree. IF Broner gets to 140 and it's a big if with his dedication, I'd suggest he can give Crawford a competitive fight. He would be the second best guy in the division IMO.Stuarty30 wrote:Crawford is obviously the top dog but if he does move up (sooner the better IMO) then I'd say Broner is probably the next best guy. Don't get me wrong, I hate the little odious twerp but on his game he's a force at 140. I'd heavily favour him against Burns but if Ricky were to beat him personally it would rank amongst my best nights as a boxing fan.davie wrote:
If Broner is the best the division has to offer, I would argue the opposite
Crawford is a p4p contender, If he steps up to WW, which I'm surprised he hasn't, then it's a pretty dire division
Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
davie wrote:Crawford would chew him up and spit him out IMOPredatorHayds wrote:Agree. IF Broner gets to 140 and it's a big if with his dedication, I'd suggest he can give Crawford a competitive fight. He would be the second best guy in the division IMO.Stuarty30 wrote:
Crawford is obviously the top dog but if he does move up (sooner the better IMO) then I'd say Broner is probably the next best guy. Don't get me wrong, I hate the little odious twerp but on his game he's a force at 140. I'd heavily favour him against Burns but if Ricky were to beat him personally it would rank amongst my best nights as a boxing fan.
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Who's noone?Tarkus wrote:140 is a good example of what happenes when a strong fighter comes along and cleans up the division. Crawford has noone to fight.
Is he an irish kid that has gone under the radar?
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
Broner v Carwford is a fight that should be made. I think Crawford stops him late. I'm surprised this match hasn't been talked about more on these forums.PredatorHayds wrote:Agree. IF Broner gets to 140 and it's a big if with his dedication, I'd suggest he can give Crawford a competitive fight. He would be the second best guy in the division IMO.Stuarty30 wrote:Crawford is obviously the top dog but if he does move up (sooner the better IMO) then I'd say Broner is probably the next best guy. Don't get me wrong, I hate the little odious twerp but on his game he's a force at 140. I'd heavily favour him against Burns but if Ricky were to beat him personally it would rank amongst my best nights as a boxing fan.davie wrote:
If Broner is the best the division has to offer, I would argue the opposite
Crawford is a p4p contender, If he steps up to WW, which I'm surprised he hasn't, then it's a pretty dire division
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
I think he'd stop him late Davie. I really think Crawford is the goods.davie wrote:Crawford would chew him up and spit him out IMOPredatorHayds wrote:Agree. IF Broner gets to 140 and it's a big if with his dedication, I'd suggest he can give Crawford a competitive fight. He would be the second best guy in the division IMO.Stuarty30 wrote:
Crawford is obviously the top dog but if he does move up (sooner the better IMO) then I'd say Broner is probably the next best guy. Don't get me wrong, I hate the little odious twerp but on his game he's a force at 140. I'd heavily favour him against Burns but if Ricky were to beat him personally it would rank amongst my best nights as a boxing fan.
Re: Worst Division - Super Lightweight?
chiggsy wrote:Who's noone?Tarkus wrote:140 is a good example of what happenes when a strong fighter comes along and cleans up the division. Crawford has noone to fight.
Is he an irish kid that has gone under the radar?
Thats Nooney.