I answered your question but it's disappointing to see you refrain from discussing the facts or your apparent failure to focus your comments on the topic of the thread.punchoutsb wrote:Your persistent avoidance of my request for clarification is proof that you admit you are yet again talking out of your arse. You should apologize to everyone in this thread for making them a little more stupid by suggesting that one should lodge complaints before the controversial event occurs. Hopefully someday you realize how idiotic your suggestions are, but I doubt you will as that would take a hint of rational thought.Enlightened-One wrote:It's easy to complain about anything that doesn't go your way the second it happens, but to balme other people for your own mistake is stupid.punchoutsb wrote:
![]()
Once again you manage to post a nice little conglomeration of words while avoiding the question posed.
How far in advance of a controversial event should one begin to complain since complaining after the controversial event is incompatible with not complaining before the controversial event?
Have you paid attention to Kathy Duva's complaints about Ward?
Have you reviewed Kovalev's resume, in the context of an entire set of American judges scoring Sergey's bouts that were staged on US soil?
Have you reviewed how many of the Eastern European or Communist fighters in Main Events stable that had only American judges scoring their bouts that took place in America?
Have you reviewed Kathy Duva's complaints prior to the first Kovalev-Ward fight that related to all the judges being American?
Have you submitted a post in this thread that relates to the the thread title?
Once again you manage to post a nice little conglomeration of questions while avoiding addressing the facts of the situation.
Is it because the reality of the situation fails to adhere to your preferred narrative, since there's no way for you to spin the facts so that they're aligned with your personal bias?