I can think of at least 5 guys that were in the Top 10 when Vitali fought them. So no his matchmaking isn't better than Vitali's.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I agree, his matchmaking is better than vitalis was.
wilder? Who be next?
Re: wilder? Who be next?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: wilder? Who be next?
If Briggs wins his belt and Wilder continues to act like he's serious about his unification bullshit...
Re: wilder? Who be next?
If Briggs beat Oquendo for that belt, Briggs still wouldn't be ranked Top 30. That's how meaningless that belt is.asdfjkl wrote:If Briggs wins his belt and Wilder continues to act like he's serious about his unification bullshit...
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Sure it is.gilgamesh wrote:I can think of at least 5 guys that were in the Top 10 when Vitali fought them. So no his matchmaking isn't better than Vitali's.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I agree, his matchmaking is better than vitalis was.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Based on what?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Sure it is.gilgamesh wrote:I can think of at least 5 guys that were in the Top 10 when Vitali fought them. So no his matchmaking isn't better than Vitali's.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I agree, his matchmaking is better than vitalis was.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Based on how terrible vitalis opponents were in his title defenses. Who was his best? Arreola? Solid? It's at least equal and nobody bitches about him.gilgamesh wrote:Based on what?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Sure it is.gilgamesh wrote:
I can think of at least 5 guys that were in the Top 10 when Vitali fought them. So no his matchmaking isn't better than Vitali's.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Arreola, Adamek, Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson and Danny Williams were all Top 10 at the time Vitali fought them.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Based on how terrible vitalis opponents were in his title defenses. Who was his best? Arreola? Solid? It's at least equal and nobody bitches about him.gilgamesh wrote:Based on what?SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Sure it is.
Wilder has fought 1 Top 10 opponent in his entire career. Stiverne.
Now he certainly has plenty of time to eclipse Vitali's weak resume, but he hasn't done it yet.
Though I will acknowledge with the victory over Helenius, Johann Duhaupas has SINCE become a Top 10 ranked Heavyweight even though he wasn't at the time Wilder fought him. So if you want to give Wilder that one, that makes 2. I'd only consider a guy a Top 10 ranked guy if he was Top 10 at the time he fought him.
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Vitali's style is 100 times more cowardice than Wilder's. His style was developed to not get KOed. I understand no one wants to get KOed. But it was very unpleasant to watch. And the way he fought Fury... Comon.gilgamesh wrote:Arreola, Adamek, Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson and Danny Williams were all Top 10 at the time Vitali fought them.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Based on how terrible vitalis opponents were in his title defenses. Who was his best? Arreola? Solid? It's at least equal and nobody bitches about him.gilgamesh wrote:
Based on what?
Wilder has fought 1 Top 10 opponent in his entire career. Stiverne.
Now he certainly has plenty of time to eclipse Vitali's weak resume, but he hasn't done it yet.
Though I will acknowledge with the victory over Helenius, Johann Duhaupas has SINCE become a Top 10 ranked Heavyweight even though he wasn't at the time Wilder fought him. So if you want to give Wilder that one, that makes 2. I'd only consider a guy a Top 10 ranked guy if he was Top 10 at the time he fought him.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Arreola and Danny Williams were never in my top 10 & Kirk Johnson was a beached whale.chisora was better than those guys.gilgamesh wrote:Arreola, Adamek, Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson and Danny Williams were all Top 10 at the time Vitali fought them.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Based on how terrible vitalis opponents were in his title defenses. Who was his best? Arreola? Solid? It's at least equal and nobody bitches about him.gilgamesh wrote:
Based on what?
Wilder has fought 1 Top 10 opponent in his entire career. Stiverne.
Now he certainly has plenty of time to eclipse Vitali's weak resume, but he hasn't done it yet.
Though I will acknowledge with the victory over Helenius, Johann Duhaupas has SINCE become a Top 10 ranked Heavyweight even though he wasn't at the time Wilder fought him. So if you want to give Wilder that one, that makes 2. I'd only consider a guy a Top 10 ranked guy if he was Top 10 at the time he fought him.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Impractical Poster wrote:Vitali's style is 100 times more cowardice than Wilder's. His style was developed to not get KOed. I understand no one wants to get KOed. But it was very unpleasant to watch. And the way he fought Fury... Comon.gilgamesh wrote:Arreola, Adamek, Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson and Danny Williams were all Top 10 at the time Vitali fought them.SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Based on how terrible vitalis opponents were in his title defenses. Who was his best? Arreola? Solid? It's at least equal and nobody bitches about him.
Wilder has fought 1 Top 10 opponent in his entire career. Stiverne.
Now he certainly has plenty of time to eclipse Vitali's weak resume, but he hasn't done it yet.
Though I will acknowledge with the victory over Helenius, Johann Duhaupas has SINCE become a Top 10 ranked Heavyweight even though he wasn't at the time Wilder fought him. So if you want to give Wilder that one, that makes 2. I'd only consider a guy a Top 10 ranked guy if he was Top 10 at the time he fought him.
Are you talking about Vitali or wlad?
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: wilder? Who be next?
You're talking about Wlad not Vitali.Impractical Poster wrote:Vitali's style is 100 times more cowardice than Wilder's. His style was developed to not get KOed. I understand no one wants to get KOed. But it was very unpleasant to watch. And the way he fought Fury... Comon.gilgamesh wrote:Arreola, Adamek, Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson and Danny Williams were all Top 10 at the time Vitali fought them.SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Based on how terrible vitalis opponents were in his title defenses. Who was his best? Arreola? Solid? It's at least equal and nobody bitches about him.
Wilder has fought 1 Top 10 opponent in his entire career. Stiverne.
Now he certainly has plenty of time to eclipse Vitali's weak resume, but he hasn't done it yet.
Though I will acknowledge with the victory over Helenius, Johann Duhaupas has SINCE become a Top 10 ranked Heavyweight even though he wasn't at the time Wilder fought him. So if you want to give Wilder that one, that makes 2. I'd only consider a guy a Top 10 ranked guy if he was Top 10 at the time he fought him.
Wlad fought Fury
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Shit!! Yes, Wlad. Got the two mixed up yet again.Ricky_ wrote:Impractical Poster wrote:Vitali's style is 100 times more cowardice than Wilder's. His style was developed to not get KOed. I understand no one wants to get KOed. But it was very unpleasant to watch. And the way he fought Fury... Comon.gilgamesh wrote:
Arreola, Adamek, Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson and Danny Williams were all Top 10 at the time Vitali fought them.
Wilder has fought 1 Top 10 opponent in his entire career. Stiverne.
Now he certainly has plenty of time to eclipse Vitali's weak resume, but he hasn't done it yet.
Though I will acknowledge with the victory over Helenius, Johann Duhaupas has SINCE become a Top 10 ranked Heavyweight even though he wasn't at the time Wilder fought him. So if you want to give Wilder that one, that makes 2. I'd only consider a guy a Top 10 ranked guy if he was Top 10 at the time he fought him.
Are you talking about Vitali or wlad?
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I didn't say they were anything special. The guys ranked 6 thru 10 now aren't anything special either. That's what makes the fact that Wilder is avoiding them all the more shameful.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Arreola and Danny Williams were never in my top 10 & Kirk Johnson was a beached whale.chisora was better than those guys.gilgamesh wrote:Arreola, Adamek, Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson and Danny Williams were all Top 10 at the time Vitali fought them.SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Based on how terrible vitalis opponents were in his title defenses. Who was his best? Arreola? Solid? It's at least equal and nobody bitches about him.
Wilder has fought 1 Top 10 opponent in his entire career. Stiverne.
Now he certainly has plenty of time to eclipse Vitali's weak resume, but he hasn't done it yet.
Though I will acknowledge with the victory over Helenius, Johann Duhaupas has SINCE become a Top 10 ranked Heavyweight even though he wasn't at the time Wilder fought him. So if you want to give Wilder that one, that makes 2. I'd only consider a guy a Top 10 ranked guy if he was Top 10 at the time he fought him.
I don't think I would've had Danny Williams in my Top 10 either, but I'm pretty sure they were Top 10 according to Ring Magazine or something of that sort at the time Vitali fought them.
Kirk Johnson was definitely a fat tub of sh*t when he fought Vitali. No argument there, and I really never got why he was highly ranked in the first place, but he was.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
gilgamesh wrote:How would it even be possible to be trying to make the biggest fights possible and not fight a Top 10 opponent in 5 title defenses? Luis Ortiz, Carlos Takam, Andy Ruiz...any of those guys would be better than who he's defended against, and I'm sure he could get one of those guys to fight him.marvelous marv wrote:The biggest difference to me is that some of Wilder's opponents, without going thru every fight, were a result of the Povetkin situation or injury. I still feel he wants to make the biggest fights possible. He will be in London to do commentary for Sky and meet with the winner of Wlad/Joshua, which means nothing unless they sign to fight him, but he is trying.gilgamesh wrote:
5 title defenses. Not one of them against a Top 10 ranked opponent. Stevenson's title reign is indeed reprehensible, but guess what...he's fought Top 10 ranked opponents in that reign. So if his reign is reprehensible what does that make Wilder's?
Wilder is a joke.
He wants a big money fight, but he doesn't want any opponent with a pulse until he's getting a big money payday because he's a coward and knows he doesn't deserve the position he's in.
Wilder did have two fights fall through due to PED testing, two fights to test a newly healed broken hand. Other than that he took fights to stay busy, as he promised he would as champion. He knows as well as anyone his time is now to fight a top guy. He is talented, but seems still raw at times. The times when he looks his worst is when he is flailing away trying to finish someone after he hurt them. I would say his recent 5 or so opponents are as tough or tougher than what Joshua has fought, and Joshua is rated much much higher at least on this board.
He says he wants the winner of Joshua vs Wlad, so hopefully he gets it. His reputation is declining even though he hasn't defended his title with anyone not in the top 15 WBC.
I wouldn't call anyone that won a heavyweight championship (or any pro boxing championship at any weight) a coward and a joke.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
The problem right now is, who is available now that is a credible opponent? Anyone who's anyone is tied up at the moment. Joshua is tied up with Klitschko, Parker with H.Fury. Don't think we'll ever see Povetkin and Wilder ever share a ring. T.Fury is still out the game. Ortiz, Pulev and Whyte are also all tied up in their own fights.
Anyone care to make any credible recommendations?
Anyone care to make any credible recommendations?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I couldn't care less about any rankings. They're similar level fighters.gilgamesh wrote:I didn't say they were anything special. The guys ranked 6 thru 10 now aren't anything special either. That's what makes the fact that Wilder is avoiding them all the more shameful.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Arreola and Danny Williams were never in my top 10 & Kirk Johnson was a beached whale.chisora was better than those guys.gilgamesh wrote:
Arreola, Adamek, Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson and Danny Williams were all Top 10 at the time Vitali fought them.
Wilder has fought 1 Top 10 opponent in his entire career. Stiverne.
Now he certainly has plenty of time to eclipse Vitali's weak resume, but he hasn't done it yet.
Though I will acknowledge with the victory over Helenius, Johann Duhaupas has SINCE become a Top 10 ranked Heavyweight even though he wasn't at the time Wilder fought him. So if you want to give Wilder that one, that makes 2. I'd only consider a guy a Top 10 ranked guy if he was Top 10 at the time he fought him.
I don't think I would've had Danny Williams in my Top 10 either, but I'm pretty sure they were Top 10 according to Ring Magazine or something of that sort at the time Vitali fought them.
Kirk Johnson was definitely a fat tub of sh*t when he fought Vitali. No argument there, and I really never got why he was highly ranked in the first place, but he was.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Vitali has undoubtedly fought better opposition than Wilder
I think even current Chisora would very arguably be Wilder's best opponent, and when Vitali was Wilder's age he stepped up against Lewis.
Vitali: Lewis, Peter, Adamek, Chisora, Solis, Gomez, Bryd, prime Arreola, Sanders, Hide..
Wilder: Stiverne, Scott, Molina, Duhaupas, shot Arreola, Szpilka, Washington, Audley, Kelvin Price..
I think even current Chisora would very arguably be Wilder's best opponent, and when Vitali was Wilder's age he stepped up against Lewis.
Vitali: Lewis, Peter, Adamek, Chisora, Solis, Gomez, Bryd, prime Arreola, Sanders, Hide..
Wilder: Stiverne, Scott, Molina, Duhaupas, shot Arreola, Szpilka, Washington, Audley, Kelvin Price..
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Are Chisora and Takam busy? They're not great, but I think they'd arguably be his best opponents.Rob3_142 wrote:The problem right now is, who is available now that is a credible opponent? Anyone who's anyone is tied up at the moment. Joshua is tied up with Klitschko, Parker with H.Fury. Don't think we'll ever see Povetkin and Wilder ever share a ring. T.Fury is still out the game. Ortiz, Pulev and Whyte are also all tied up in their own fights.
Anyone care to make any credible recommendations?
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Chisora is scheduled to face Helenius in a rematch, but the likes of Takam and Ruiz are still available, although I don't think they qualify as credible opponents.crusader wrote:Are Chisora and Takam busy? They're not great, but I think they'd arguably be his best opponents.Rob3_142 wrote:The problem right now is, who is available now that is a credible opponent? Anyone who's anyone is tied up at the moment. Joshua is tied up with Klitschko, Parker with H.Fury. Don't think we'll ever see Povetkin and Wilder ever share a ring. T.Fury is still out the game. Ortiz, Pulev and Whyte are also all tied up in their own fights.
Anyone care to make any credible recommendations?
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Why wouldn't Takam be credible? He was very competitive with juiced up Povetkin, should've gotten a win over unbeaten Perez, and dominated Thompson with TT still had a bit left. He's been competitive with multiple contenders (unlike fat boy Stiverne), he isn't shot, and he wasn't clowned and stopped a few fights before by a Jennings type.
He's not an elite HW, but he'd arguably be at the very top of Wilder's resume.
He's not an elite HW, but he'd arguably be at the very top of Wilder's resume.
Last edited by crusader on 19 Apr 2017, 19:48, edited 1 time in total.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I agree.gilgamesh wrote:Somebody who's not in the Top 10...you can bet on that.
If I had to guess, I think I would go with Breazeale, Rudenko, or Martin. I don't think that the Breazeale lawsuit rules him out as a possible opponent, since sometimes boxers' lawsuits aid them in acquiring title shots / mandatory status, i.e. Fres Oquendo. ... It should go without saying that I don't consider Breazeale a top 10 heavyweight, regardless of his boxrec ranking.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
The one fight falling through actually resulted in him fighting a better opponent. Wawryzk was a sh*ttier opponent than Gerald Washington. So that one actually worked out for the better. Washington was at least a big, unbeaten Top 20 kinda guy.Badhusker wrote:gilgamesh wrote:How would it even be possible to be trying to make the biggest fights possible and not fight a Top 10 opponent in 5 title defenses? Luis Ortiz, Carlos Takam, Andy Ruiz...any of those guys would be better than who he's defended against, and I'm sure he could get one of those guys to fight him.marvelous marv wrote:
The biggest difference to me is that some of Wilder's opponents, without going thru every fight, were a result of the Povetkin situation or injury. I still feel he wants to make the biggest fights possible. He will be in London to do commentary for Sky and meet with the winner of Wlad/Joshua, which means nothing unless they sign to fight him, but he is trying.
Wilder is a joke.
He wants a big money fight, but he doesn't want any opponent with a pulse until he's getting a big money payday because he's a coward and knows he doesn't deserve the position he's in.
Wilder did have two fights fall through due to PED testing, two fights to test a newly healed broken hand. Other than that he took fights to stay busy, as he promised he would as champion.
Re: wilder? Who be next?
Stiverne is WBC No. 1 contender, so I assume there will be a rematch with Wilder or maybe Ortiz because he is No. 2. Pulev is No. 3. Dillian Whyte and Carlos Takam are also in WBC's top ten. I would rather see any of those matchups instead of Stiverne. I agree that Wilder should start defending against legitimate top 10-15 contenders.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: wilder? Who be next?
That's because of the lawsuit lol, you can't blame Briggs for that. Molina, Duhaupas and Arreola weren't top 30 either at the time of their fights with Wilder. So Briggs fits that bill. The only difference is that Briggs has a lot bigger chance as any other opponent Deontay has ever had.gilgamesh wrote:If Briggs beat Oquendo for that belt, Briggs still wouldn't be ranked Top 30. That's how meaningless that belt is.asdfjkl wrote:If Briggs wins his belt and Wilder continues to act like he's serious about his unification bullshit...
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: wilder? Who be next?
I never said he hadn't, just the same kind of matchmaking from the position of beltholder.crusader wrote:Vitali has undoubtedly fought better opposition than Wilder
I think even current Chisora would very arguably be Wilder's best opponent, and when Vitali was Wilder's age he stepped up against Lewis.
Vitali: Lewis, Peter, Adamek, Chisora, Solis, Gomez, Bryd, prime Arreola, Sanders, Hide..
Wilder: Stiverne, Scott, Molina, Duhaupas, shot Arreola, Szpilka, Washington, Audley, Kelvin Price..