Michael Grant still plodding away.

Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Mimmy »

I see former world title challenger, heavyweight Michael Grant fought last night in Poland having his first fight in over 2 and half years but getting knocked out in 2 rounds against Krzysztof Zimnoch. Zimnoch beat Oliver McCall a few years back over 8 rounds

Now 22-1 but not sure what this guys potential is.
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by boxingknockout »

Really? That's a shock...... seems like so long ago he was a prospect...... h must be 50 years old surely
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Syntax Error »

It's such a shame when guys like him just seem content to be walking punchbags for hire.

I could sort of understand if he was always at that level, but he isn't, he was once a big prospect who fought for a world title, so he's tasted the big time but now this? :o
Dixonian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Dixonian »

Syntax Error wrote:It's such a shame when guys like him just seem content to be walking punchbags for hire.

I could sort of understand if he was always at that level, but he isn't, he was once a big prospect who fought for a world title, so he's tasted the big time but now this? :o
Yea he always had shortcomings but could punch and had bags of heart.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Stuarty »

Noticed this on the schedule the other day. Had to do a double take. I remember watching him when I was still in school! He's 45 I think. Younger than I thought he was.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Tuan_Jim »

It's easy to forget how huge the buzz about Michael Grant was. He was seen at the time as the future of heavyweight boxing, the uncrowned king, the embodiment of the media's image of the futuristic, perfectly-sculpted superheavyweight. The general opinion was that he would outlast and knockout Lennox Lewis, who was 34 and had underwhelmed in his two fights with the ancient Holyfield.

It's always useful to remember Michael Grant when predicting big things for heavyweight stars who have yet to be tested.

That being said, Grant accumulated a fine selection of A and B level scalps: Andrew Golota, Al Cole, Lou Savarese, David Izon, Obed Sullivan, Ray Anis, Jorge Luis Gonzalez, Lionel Butler. And plenty of names avoided him, including Shannon Briggs.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by tobyh5 »

Stuarty30 wrote:Noticed this on the schedule the other day. Had to do a double take. I remember watching him when I was still in school! He's 45 I think. Younger than I thought he was.
He is 44 which shocked me too. I assumed he had to be older as the Lewis fight was 17 years ago!

I am embarrassed to admit I thought he may prove to be the real deal. Lot of AJ similarities, potentially.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Stuarty »

tobyh5 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Noticed this on the schedule the other day. Had to do a double take. I remember watching him when I was still in school! He's 45 I think. Younger than I thought he was.
He is 44 which shocked me too. I assumed he had to be older as the Lewis fight was 17 years ago!

I am embarrassed to admit I thought he may prove to be the real deal. Lot of AJ similarities, potentially.
So you reckon the humble one will get chinned on Sat :oo

17 years ago! Christ! Doesn't feel that long ago either.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Crease »

Tuan_Jim wrote:It's easy to forget how huge the buzz about Michael Grant was. He was seen at the time as the future of heavyweight boxing, the uncrowned king, the embodiment of the media's image of the futuristic, perfectly-sculpted superheavyweight.
No doubt that he once did look the part:

Image

Image
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Crease wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:It's easy to forget how huge the buzz about Michael Grant was. He was seen at the time as the future of heavyweight boxing, the uncrowned king, the embodiment of the media's image of the futuristic, perfectly-sculpted superheavyweight.
No doubt that he once did look the part:

Image

Image
He certainly did look the part! And he had some heart too.

Mischief: if he had fought Wladimir Klitschko circa 1999/2000, Grant would have knocked him out.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Autobarn »

Think Grant still has an awesome physique. At least, he did a couple of years ago. That can fool some people.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13317
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by MightyWarrior »

Can't believe he's still going ...

The Lewis loss was brutal ...but we already knew he was very vulnerable because Golota nearly KO'd him in the first round I seem to recall
cold187
Middleweight
Posts: 742
Joined: 24 Nov 2013, 08:51

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by cold187 »

It's Chris rock
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Stuarty »

cold187 wrote:It's Chris rock
:lol: Bloody is as well
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23133
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by mickey1975 »

I didn't think he'd beat Lennox. I thought he had no chance.
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Freedom2013 »

Zimnoch beat Deontay Wilder in the amateurs.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16928
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Stuarty30 wrote:
cold187 wrote:It's Chris rock
:lol: Bloody is as well
Damn that's uncanny :clap:

When you see a white dude with a black chick, you know she be looking like Beyoncé. :lol:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by crusader »

He was better than he often gets credit for these days. I think he would've done well against the likes of Stiverne, Breazeale, Hammer, etc...
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by steve689 »

For an updated version of Grant vs. Lewis, see the upcoming Klitschko vs. Joshua fight this Saturday evening :bag:
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12050
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Taansend »

Tuan_Jim wrote:It's easy to forget how huge the buzz about Michael Grant was. He was seen at the time as the future of heavyweight boxing, the uncrowned king, the embodiment of the media's image of the futuristic, perfectly-sculpted superheavyweight. The general opinion was that he would outlast and knockout Lennox Lewis, who was 34 and had underwhelmed in his two fights with the ancient Holyfield.

It's always useful to remember Michael Grant when predicting big things for heavyweight stars who have yet to be tested.

That being said, Grant accumulated a fine selection of A and B level scalps: Andrew Golota, Al Cole, Lou Savarese, David Izon, Obed Sullivan, Ray Anis, Jorge Luis Gonzalez, Lionel Butler. And plenty of names avoided him, including Shannon Briggs.
I remember when he fought Lewis. I was working as the Casino Host on the Carnival Destiny - the worlds first 100,000+ tonnes cruise ship. It kept breaking down so we'd have time off here & there. Which was great :OhYes:

Anyway, I did a sweepstake among the staff. $20 per entry & there are 27 outcomes. You pay the Score then pick a random piece of paper from a hat. I was doing round by round commentary from the Sports Bar with my mic. If I remember rightly the Cruise Director won.

I still thought Grant could come back strongly after Lewis but I think he f*cked up his ankle in his next bout & had to build back up before running into Dominic Guinn who THEN became the next American hope. And then that fizzled out.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Autobarn »

Richard Steele found him in a McDonalds queue. He was, I believe, a basketball player at the time of his discovery.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by thepocketrocket »

Anyone who watched the Golota fight would have seen that Grant was basically a good athlete but not a real talented boxer. Therefore by the time 'The Land of The Giants' PPV came against Lewis, a destruction was expected.

No amount of revisionism to boost Lewis' legacy will change that.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Autobarn »

With him being a good athlete he might've done well if he was born in this era.

Because most heavyweights have really declined in their conditioning.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by thepocketrocket »

Autobarn wrote:With him being a good athlete he might've done well if he was born in this era.

Because most heavyweights have really declined in their conditioning.
The fact you are right is a really sad indictment
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Michael Grant still plodding away.

Post by Tuan_Jim »

thepocketrocket wrote:Anyone who watched the Golota fight would have seen that Grant was basically a good athlete but not a real talented boxer. Therefore by the time 'The Land of The Giants' PPV came against Lewis, a destruction was expected.

No amount of revisionism to boost Lewis' legacy will change that.
There was a huge body of opinion that had Michael Grant the winner. It's not a revisionist history, it's simply fact. Lewis's legacy is good enough without anyone needing to boost the Grant win.
Post Reply