The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post Reply
dalcumly
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1319
Joined: 03 Sep 2010, 08:11

The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by dalcumly »

Am I imagining things, but did anyone else think the ring on Saturday night was smaller than usual?
If I'm correct why would anyone accept a smaller than usual ring when the home fighter needs as much room as possible to stay out of th way of a bulldozer?
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by Stuarty »

Didn't notice anything at the time. Will have to watch it back. A smaller ring would've suited the wee Georgian dude.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by Boxing Prospect »

I didn't notice anything unusual here...I remember watching Cai Zong Ju vs Etsuko Tada and thinking they had an hilariously big ring at the time
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32964
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Perhaps the ring just seemed smaller because Khurtsidze found it so easy to cut off and get to Langford quickly so often?
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by crusader »

I've seen other mentions of this too, but I didn't notice it during the fights.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by Oiky »

Can't say I noticed it tbh
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2037
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by GlobalBox »

dalcumly wrote:Am I imagining things, but did anyone else think the ring on Saturday night was smaller than usual?
If I'm correct why would anyone accept a smaller than usual ring when the home fighter needs as much room as possible to stay out of th way of a bulldozer?
Thought exactly the same and just assumed I was seeing things because it would have only suited the away fighter.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16928
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by Nightmare Roy »

I think the ring was fine, Lanford just couldn't stay out of the way.
dannyhalifax
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 64
Joined: 29 Jan 2009, 10:02

Re: The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by dannyhalifax »

Wow I thought the same when I was watching,just brushed it off though as I was drunk.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5462
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by forcefraser »

The conspiracy thickens. He was a patsy. The game is rigged
3132DW
Middleweight
Posts: 1435
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 03:27

Re: The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by 3132DW »

dannyhalifax wrote:Wow I thought the same when I was watching,just brushed it off though as I was drunk.
They did that in a fight in Australia earlier in the year - made ring 16 x 16 - smallest it could be under Australian Boxing rules.

Think they can very from 18 to 24 feet.

There was a German show recently with Culcay/Andrade and ring looked massive in that fight.
Ettt9350
Middleweight
Posts: 175
Joined: 27 Jun 2014, 10:46

Re: The ' Langford ' ring ?

Post by Ettt9350 »

Yes I thought it was smaller than usual also, not sure it made a difference to the outcome of the fight but it could only of benefitted Khurtsidze.
Post Reply