Initially due to take place November and both were cleared to fight before ( Oct 29th)
Then in Jan the mirror said Tyson was due a three day hearing early Feb.
Nothing reported then FW said he has it in May.
UKADS ( very disgraceful policy) is not to comment until all legal cases are resolved. This includes appeals.
If this is an initial hearing then there could be an appeal, then after that there could be court of arbitration for sport in Switzerland which is FINAL. ( I got this from the site)
Surely it would have been in the Furys best interests to get the hearing done sharpish.
Way too many questions need answering here and I am concerned that due to UKADS clear inefficiency this may take an even longer time to come out.
This concerns a positive sample from Feb 2015 !!!!!!!
Naandrew wrote:I'm worried this is not a final hearing.
The time line with the hearing is.
Initially due to take place November and both were cleared to fight before ( Oct 29th)
Then in Jan the mirror said Tyson was due a three day hearing early Feb.
Nothing reported then FW said he has it in May.
UKADS ( very disgraceful policy) is not to comment until all legal cases are resolved. This includes appeals.
If this is an initial hearing then there could be an appeal, then after that there could be court of arbitration for sport in Switzerland which is FINAL. ( I got this from the site)
Surely it would have been in the Furys best interests to get the hearing done sharpish.
Way too many questions need answering here and I am concerned that due to UKADS clear inefficiency this may take an even longer time to come out.
This concerns a positive sample from Feb 2015 !!!!!!!
Seems like the most drawn out process known to man.