Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Are you that stupid R?
Fury outboxed Wlad easily and was never close to being dropped, stopped, or gassed. He didn't even need to get out of second gear to deal with Wlad more effectively than AJ did--against an older, inactive Klit.
Someone could get dropped 10 times, be down 11-0, then win by KO in the 12th; did they win more easily than someone who 12-0'd the same opponent? Obviously not
Fury outboxed Wlad easily and was never close to being dropped, stopped, or gassed. He didn't even need to get out of second gear to deal with Wlad more effectively than AJ did--against an older, inactive Klit.
Someone could get dropped 10 times, be down 11-0, then win by KO in the 12th; did they win more easily than someone who 12-0'd the same opponent? Obviously not
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Is there a point in having a rematch?
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17274
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
NO! Wlad isn't getting any younger or better. A rematch would be even worse for him.MachoTime wrote:Is there a point in having a rematch?
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
would you like time to think about that Finster?
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Absolutely nothing was landing in the attack which caused the stoppage. Klitchko was reacting and blocking punches. Total bullsh!t stoppage.Baby Face Finster wrote:The replay shows how horrible the time of the stoppage was. No punches were even landing. Give the man a chance to survive the round at least.
-
Butterbean
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 490
- Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 15:47
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
crusader wrote:Are you that stupid R?
Fury outboxed Wlad easily and was never close to being dropped, stopped, or gassed. He didn't even need to get out of second gear to deal with Wlad more effectively than AJ did--against an older, inactive Klit.
Someone could get dropped 10 times, be down 11-0, then win by KO in the 12th; did they win more easily than someone who 12-0'd the same opponent? Obviously not
joshua will absolutely flatten fury, if fury dares to face him !
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17274
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
NO!Grant wrote:would you like time to think about that Finster?
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
I agree. Wlad states he has a rematch clause and might exercise it.Baby Face Finster wrote:NO! Wlad isn't getting any younger or better. A rematch would be even worse for him.MachoTime wrote:Is there a point in having a rematch?
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17274
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Wilder's grasp of the English language is pretty funny....."the hype lived up to the fight."

Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Wlad was better and more prepared against Joshua than against Fury. Fury would not have beaten the Wlad who fought Joshua.
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
He certainly has the power to do it if he lands the right shotsButterbean wrote:crusader wrote:Are you that stupid R?
Fury outboxed Wlad easily and was never close to being dropped, stopped, or gassed. He didn't even need to get out of second gear to deal with Wlad more effectively than AJ did--against an older, inactive Klit.
Someone could get dropped 10 times, be down 11-0, then win by KO in the 12th; did they win more easily than someone who 12-0'd the same opponent? Obviously not
joshua will absolutely flatten fury, if fury dares to face him !
I'm not even sure if Fury will come back though
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Easy to say thatRScarf1 wrote:Wlad was better and more prepared against Joshua than against Fury. Fury would not have beaten the Wlad who fought Joshua.
One could also say that Fury beat Wlad far more easily because he has tools that AJ doesn't
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
RScarf1 wrote:Wlad was better and more prepared against Joshua than against Fury. Fury would not have beaten the Wlad who fought Joshua.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17274
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Fury needs to comeback in tip top shape, if he doesn't he loses to AJ, but if he does AJ won't touch him.
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
I agree, but I don't think he will retire.Baby Face Finster wrote:NO! Wlad isn't getting any younger or better. A rematch would be even worse for him.MachoTime wrote:Is there a point in having a rematch?
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
BS stoppage. Joshua hadn't hit Wlad even with a clean punch on the ropes. Let them finish the fight. They may have been worried that if Wlad survived, he would win the fight, which wasn't supposed to happen.
If Joshua is supposed to be the best of all time, and struggles with a 41 yr old Wlad, it doesn't say much for the heavyweight scene.
If Joshua is supposed to be the best of all time, and struggles with a 41 yr old Wlad, it doesn't say much for the heavyweight scene.
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Fury is without a doubt a better boxer than Joshua. Too bad he's such a retard that he ruined himself. Joshua's hype is undeserving. Hilarious that he gets the attention from beating an opponent that Fury easily handled.
-
Sequitorian
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1766
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 15:35
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
What's all this talk about Fury? ...
He's headed for a mental-institution ...
... and if he ever fights again ...
... he'll get KO'd .. (and I mean knocked-out cold) ...
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
He's headed for a mental-institution ...
... and if he ever fights again ...
... he'll get KO'd .. (and I mean knocked-out cold) ...
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
He was arguably still the best out there after Fury. I'd fancy him to beat Parker.Blodhemn wrote:Fury is without a doubt a better boxer than Joshua. Too bad he's such a retard that he ruined himself. Joshua's hype is undeserving. Hilarious that he gets the attention from beating an opponent that Fury easily handled.
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Joshua simply "exposed"
Won by one lucky uppercut. He was fading..Against a 41 year old underdog.
His chin is worse than Klitscko's. "Glass"
Future of boxing?
Next Ali ? :)
.....One click above Michael Grant.
And by the way, he's also a disrespectful jackass while loosing. Turns into a gentleman with the victory.
Won by one lucky uppercut. He was fading..Against a 41 year old underdog.
His chin is worse than Klitscko's. "Glass"
Future of boxing?
Next Ali ? :)
.....One click above Michael Grant.
And by the way, he's also a disrespectful jackass while loosing. Turns into a gentleman with the victory.
-
Butterbean
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 490
- Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 15:47
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Baby Face Finster wrote:Fury needs to comeback in tip top shape, if he doesn't he loses to AJ, but if he does AJ won't touch him.
ehhhh, no ! lmao.
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Could still see Wilder or Povetkin knocking Joshua out, and in the not so distant future, Usyk boxing rings around him.TheDarkDestroyer wrote:He was arguably still the best out there after Fury. I'd fancy him to beat Parker.Blodhemn wrote:Fury is without a doubt a better boxer than Joshua. Too bad he's such a retard that he ruined himself. Joshua's hype is undeserving. Hilarious that he gets the attention from beating an opponent that Fury easily handled.
-
manchester-mexican
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 247
- Joined: 15 Jul 2007, 11:18
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Great fight, great win, right stoppage, AJ still a kid ffs, anyone critical of him needs to feck away off from watching boxing, he fought HOF in front of 90,000 in a world title fight n all the pressure that brings, Well done AJ n Klitschko
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Parker is very mediocre.TheDarkDestroyer wrote:He was arguably still the best out there after Fury. I'd fancy him to beat Parker.Blodhemn wrote:Fury is without a doubt a better boxer than Joshua. Too bad he's such a retard that he ruined himself. Joshua's hype is undeserving. Hilarious that he gets the attention from beating an opponent that Fury easily handled.
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Yes !manchester-mexican wrote:Great fight, great win, right stoppage, AJ still a kid ffs, anyone critical of him needs to feck away off from watching boxing, he fought HOF in front of 90,000 in a world title fight n all the pressure that brings, Well done AJ n Klitschko