Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
-
boxingknockout
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2856
- Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45
Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
It looks like Okolie didn't get on last night - any reason why? Was it a swing bout that never got on, or was there any other reason?
Seems there were only 5 bouts on.....
Seems there were only 5 bouts on.....
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Timings of the fights coupled with the TV schedule meant that he couldn't fight.
https://twitter.com/Lawrence_tko/status ... 5158196225
https://twitter.com/Lawrence_tko/status ... 5158196225
-
boxingknockout
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2856
- Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Poor management. It's was only going to be a one round blowout. Put it on after Taylor-Meinke
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Yeh seems strange, they could have easily fit this in it's not as if the undercard was particularly extensive, I feel for the guy.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13433
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
He'll still have at least 5 more fights before the year is up.
-
boxingknockout
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2856
- Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Yes, but not in front of 90,000 at Wembley....jameswilson wrote:He'll still have at least 5 more fights before the year is up.
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Feel sorry for the lad
Would he still of got $$ or what ?
Would he still of got $$ or what ?
-
boxingknockout
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2856
- Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
I believe if you weigh in you get paid. (Although likely in £REEVE wrote:Feel sorry for the lad
Would he still of got $$ or what ?
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Doubt that really bothers the lad. I'm sure he would have loved to just get out there and box in that stadium on that bill. Stuff of dreams even if it was low on the undercard. They basically had no fights after Quigg and just had 'build up' for about 50 mins solid.boxingknockout wrote:I believe if you weigh in you get paid. (Although likely in £REEVE wrote:Feel sorry for the lad
Would he still of got $$ or what ?)
-
Manchester Hitman
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
That's the 2nd time already this has happened to Lawrence - I get that Matchroom /sky had to be very careful not to be late with the main event but it is extremely poor scheduling. I think josh Kelly didn't get on either?
-
leejonesjnr
- Middleweight
- Posts: 2667
- Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Nah he wouldn't beat Henshaw in 1boxingknockout wrote:Poor management. It's was only going to be a one round blowout. Put it on after Taylor-Meinke
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
obviously cracking main event but piss poor undercard. quigg was awful, kid galahad would stand him on his head and dance with him!!
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23224
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
I thought it was Okolie who won the draw they had, bit of a farce really
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Cordina won by stoppage. Taylor won by stoppage. Campbell won by stoppage. Only Quigg's fight went the distance. Were they really expecting all 4 to get stoppage wins to have time for Okolie to get on? Seems a bit mad, the lad must be gutted.
-
TheLeprechaun
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5171
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Sky were too busy showing adds and talking sh*te
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23224
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
TheLeprechaun wrote:Sky were too busy showing adds and talking sh*te
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Exactly, so much fluff and time wasting, could have easily got the other 2 fights on.TheLeprechaun wrote:Sky were too busy showing adds and talking sh*te
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Cordina won Slot for 1st fight - Okolie was live float and Kelly was anytime.handsofstone wrote:I thought it was Okolie who won the draw they had, bit of a farce really
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Adam Booth pulled Kelly - as he didn't want to be anytime float was story - don't know if true or not.Manchester Hitman wrote:That's the 2nd time already this has happened to Lawrence - I get that Matchroom /sky had to be very careful not to be late with the main event but it is extremely poor scheduling. I think josh Kelly didn't get on either?
He was sitting on couch with Kugan IFL/Ryan Burnett on Twitter so certainly wasn't going to Wembley.
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Aye likely full of Gear - hence why nobody will touch him.rhino222 wrote:obviously cracking main event but piss poor undercard. quigg was awful, kid galahad would stand him on his head and dance with him!!
Can't even get on his mates undercard in Sheffield.
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
There seemed to be plenty of time for the Okollie fight. Sky seemed to have plenty of time to kill from 9.00 pm.
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
afcpaul wrote:There seemed to be plenty of time for the Okollie fight. Sky seemed to have plenty of time to kill from 9.00 pm.
Yeah from 9.05 to 9.45 was a slot but they changed the ring apron between that time for Main Event.
Don't know if for sponsors or agreed beforehand but they swapped things around.
-
boxingknockout
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2856
- Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45
Re: Laurence Okolie - why no fight?
Yes he likely would. He was 4/6 or even lower to win by KO in first round. An henshaw got kod in 1 by Luke Masseyleejonesjnr wrote:Nah he wouldn't beat Henshaw in 1boxingknockout wrote:Poor management. It's was only going to be a one round blowout. Put it on after Taylor-Meinke