Hateful/vile stuff is of course uncalled for for Wlad. He is what he is. A class act, true professional, whose had a very good career.verlichte wrote:Whilst I agree, someone that seems too “perfect” or too “nice”, can sometimes be less entertaining than an eccentric controversial character, I don’t feel that it’s a good enough reason to justify some of the venomous severe hate-filled aggressive comments that I’ve read about Klitschko on this forum.Ossyrules wrote:It's kind of like asking why wasn't Arthur fowler everyone's favourite eastenders character? Honest, family man
Everyone liked the Mitchell brothers, trouble makers. Entertainment
For sure, everyone’s entitled to their personal opinion, to like or dislike whoever they choose, and I’m not trying to defend Klitschko if anyone has a legitimate gripe about the man. However, I’m utterly mystified about the vile comments that people regularly post on this forum about him.
I can understand people’s complaints about Wladimir being “boring”, but some of the other remarks, that are much more hateful in nature, seem utterly bizarre to me.
The trouble with boxing fans, typified on this forum is extremists
Joshua greatest heavyweight ever
Wlad is top 5 p4p
Numerous fury worshipping stuff
Loma is better than Pacquaio or mayweather
These are the ones off the top of my head. All boxers discussed are very good, but stuff gets easily blown out of proportion
Wlads unpopular for his style of fighting imo more than anything else