Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Was the stoppage 'early'?

Yes
35
33%
No
72
67%
 
Total votes: 107

SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by SAPFO »

I know, another thread, but this ones specific as I know a few people who thought at the time it was early.


Wlad didn't seem to complain at the end, and he was already down twice that round, but nothing was landed in that final flury by AJ, it was more so that AJ had 'rushed' Wlad to finnish him off while Wlad was getting his bearings. Do you think 10 more seconds and Wlad was out cold, so the stoppage was just. Or was it slightly 'early'?

A good stoppage by the ref I think, allowing Wlad to remain dignified in defeat. Its fights like this where that 1 extra punch can cause brain damage.
Last edited by SAPFO on 01 May 2017, 13:47, edited 1 time in total.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Ezzard »

Good stoppage... Maybe Wlad would have recovered but not worth the risk.
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by wesshaw1985 »

Ezzard wrote:Good stoppage... Maybe Wlad would have recovered but not worth the risk.
too big of a fight for maybes...
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32962
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Absolutely not. The fact that Wlad didn't complain says it all.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Stoppage was bang on. He looked pretty spent after the second knockdown, I'd have not argued if it was stopped then.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2716
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Flump »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Stoppage was bang on. He looked pretty spent after the second knockdown, I'd have not argued if it was stopped then.
This. He handled the whole fight well.

If it had been IJL, T O'C or Phil Edwards it would have been stopped in the 5th as soon as Klitschko hit the deck.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Stuarty »

I've no problems at all with the stoppage.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32962
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Flump wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Stoppage was bang on. He looked pretty spent after the second knockdown, I'd have not argued if it was stopped then.
This. He handled the whole fight well.

If it had been IJL, T O'C or Phil Edwards it would have been stopped in the 5th as soon as Klitschko hit the deck.
Jesus, can you imagine IJL in charge of that fight. He'd be flapping around like crazy. God only knows when he would have jumped in prematurely.
Tangerine
Middleweight
Posts: 1306
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 17:33

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Tangerine »

My gut feeling at the time was it was stopped too early.Wladimir didnt complain though,he even near enough nodded to the ref in acceptance.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Ricky_ »

The ref did a good job but he shat the bed on the stoppage. Joshua was 1 big shot from finding a finish... but so was Wlad in rounds 5 & 6.
TheRiverCityHippy
Middleweight
Posts: 8507
Joined: 08 Mar 2014, 15:39

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by TheRiverCityHippy »

When you've been knocked down twice in the round and find yourself backed up against the ropes with your opponent teeing off on you dont be surprised if the ref feels he has to make a decision.
Steven_b96
Super Lightweight
Posts: 16
Joined: 12 Mar 2017, 07:39

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Steven_b96 »

how can people say it was stopped to early 2 big knock downs in the 11th ref made the right decision got to think of the fighters health at the end of the day.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Crease »

No, he was gassed, dazed & hurt.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Ezzard »

I got the feeling that after round 6 the next man to touch down was finished. Wlad couldn't recover that late in the fight.

Scorecards were a bit of a shocker to be honest.

Wlad looked to be cruising...though Joshua was coming back into it.
cold187
Middleweight
Posts: 742
Joined: 24 Nov 2013, 08:51

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by cold187 »

HBO feel the stoppage was premature because

1. wlad wasn't getting caught on the ropes
2. given the magnitude of the fight, should have let it go on, as both fighters already proved can come back from knockdowns

if it did continue guaranteed rounds 12 wlad would have gone into it guns blazing
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by rhino222 »

i thought it was about 2 secs too early. wlad was not really getting caught much in that salvo.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5462
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by forcefraser »

rhino222 wrote:i thought it was about 2 secs too early. wlad was not really getting caught much in that salvo.
Two fisted salvo ?
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26663
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by KiwiRider »

Wlad was lucky he was allowed up after the second knockdown. He fell to the canvas, no breaking his fall. He was wobbling and dazed. Then AJ teed off on him. I'm glad it was stopped then, he had been given a chance and was not firing back. It only takes one big flush hit and we would have lost a true champion to the veggie patch. What a waste that would have been.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26663
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by KiwiRider »

If you still doubt the stoppage, look at the Compubox stats for round 11
Wlad did not land one punch, no jab, no powe shot, nothing.
http://photo.BS.com/uploads/jo ... mpubox.jpg
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23224
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by handsofstone »

No way near the worst stoppage ive ever seen and at 1st I thought it was bang on but as soon as I seen the replay none of the punches I thought landed did land so I thought the ref could've waited, I don't like to see fighters get hurt but Wlad had enough wits about him to avoid getting hit, he might have made it to the end of the round despite being hurt??

Not too much complaints from Wlad though
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Counter-puncher »

forcefraser wrote:
rhino222 wrote:i thought it was about 2 secs too early. wlad was not really getting caught much in that salvo.
Two fisted salvo ?
That's very Ronald McIntosh :TU:
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Tarkus »

Stoppage was little premature, Wlad did not take a single clean shot on the ropes in the last exchange. Nevertheless, the better man won on the night. And even though Wlad indicated he was not pleased with the stoppage he did not make a big deal out of it.
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8627
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by coneye »

Personaly , i thought a stoppage on the second knockdown , would of been fair , Vlad was all over the place ,
Verdi
Welterweight
Posts: 819
Joined: 12 Apr 2016, 18:08

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by Verdi »

He was down twice and not defending himself properly. Good stoppage IMO.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13436
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*

Post by jameswilson »

It was nice to have a fight with no controversy at all. I thought the ref was spot on, I bet if we go back to the rbr there will be no mention of the ref at all. Exactly how we all want it.
Post Reply