The fact that Wlad didn't complain and hasn't complained says it all. It wasn't early.
As others have said I'd not have been surprised if it was stopped after the second knockdown in the final round. A very heavy knockdown and Wlad looked gone.
Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*
Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*
His legs looked totally gone after the first, he did well to get back up and get knocked down again. I felt the ref was over generous after the first KD and seemed to give him plenty of time.
Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*
I agree - I thought it was a very good stoppage and that the ref gave Wlad every chance.orbtastic wrote:His legs looked totally gone after the first, he did well to get back up and get knocked down again. I felt the ref was over generous after the first KD and seemed to give him plenty of time.
Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*
No, it was a good stoppage.
Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*
Thought the ref was excellent on Sat
Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*
When did he do this? I haven't seen it.Tarkus wrote:Stoppage was little premature, Wlad did not take a single clean shot on the ropes in the last exchange. Nevertheless, the better man won on the night. And even though Wlad indicated he was not pleased with the stoppage he did not make a big deal out of it.
Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*
Post fight presser. Along the lines of 'I could say something about stoppage but I wont'.gp. wrote:When did he do this? I haven't seen it.Tarkus wrote:Stoppage was little premature, Wlad did not take a single clean shot on the ropes in the last exchange. Nevertheless, the better man won on the night. And even though Wlad indicated he was not pleased with the stoppage he did not make a big deal out of it.
Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*
I'd not have been surprised if it was stopped after the first knockdown in the final round, Klitschko was was barely standing. But if he let it go he should have waited until at least one punch landed. Technically thats how it should be.dirk2686 wrote:The fact that Wlad didn't complain and hasn't complained says it all. It wasn't early.
As others have said I'd not have been surprised if it was stopped after the second knockdown in the final round. A very heavy knockdown and Wlad looked gone.
Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*
my thoughts entirely, if that was stopped with joshua as the loser there would have been an uproar as the punches were not landing.handsofstone wrote:No way near the worst stoppage ive ever seen and at 1st I thought it was bang on but as soon as I seen the replay none of the punches I thought landed did land so I thought the ref could've waited, I don't like to see fighters get hurt but Wlad had enough wits about him to avoid getting hit, he might have made it to the end of the round despite being hurt??
Not too much complaints from Wlad though
it was not an entirely bad stoppage i might add, i would have understood it more if it had been stopped after the previous knockdown as there was a bit of a long count..........
as stated, no complaints from the Klit camp.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Was the Wlad Stoppage Early? *POLL*
A good stoppage and if you wanted to argue I'd say if anything it was a little too late, because if the ref had had his wits about him, and made Wlad walk towards him after the first knockdown, he would have been all over the shop. His legs were gone. and an oldish fighter like that, in front of a powerhouse puncher, you have to look after.