Why? I hardly see records as being a relevant measure of how good a fighter is and if anyone wanted to see the fighters' records, they could easily look them up. By doing so, they will see who they've fought, which is more useful information than a series of numbers.Sequitorian wrote:Always post the fighters' records next to their names when you do this ...
Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings CLOSED
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
-
Sequitorian
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1766
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 15:35
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
... who asked you? ...jezzamundo wrote:Why? I hardly see records as being a relevant measure of how good a fighter is and if anyone wanted to see the fighters' records, they could easily look them up. By doing so, they will see who they've fought, which is more useful information than a series of numbers.Sequitorian wrote:Always post the fighters' records next to their names when you do this ...
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Wach to 15, Teper out
Pulev to 5, Johnson out
Joshua to 1, Wlad to 2
Given Wlad's inactivity, which at 18 months typically bumps fighters completely out of ratings, and the fact that Wlad was beaten 8-4/9-3 in his previous fight, I think AJ falls short of being locked into champion status. In my view Wlad did not have a champion's torch to pass this time...
Pulev to 5, Johnson out
Joshua to 1, Wlad to 2
Given Wlad's inactivity, which at 18 months typically bumps fighters completely out of ratings, and the fact that Wlad was beaten 8-4/9-3 in his previous fight, I think AJ falls short of being locked into champion status. In my view Wlad did not have a champion's torch to pass this time...
Last edited by crusader on 03 May 2017, 20:39, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Wach to #15, Teper unranked
Pulev stays at #6, Johnson unranked.
Joshua is now #1, W.Klitschko is now #2
Pulev stays at #6, Johnson unranked.
Joshua is now #1, W.Klitschko is now #2
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
It's hilarious how you talk about honor and respect when you're such a dickhead yourselfSequitorian wrote:... who asked you? ...jezzamundo wrote:Why? I hardly see records as being a relevant measure of how good a fighter is and if anyone wanted to see the fighters' records, they could easily look them up. By doing so, they will see who they've fought, which is more useful information than a series of numbers.Sequitorian wrote:Always post the fighters' records next to their names when you do this ...
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Topic A - How are the rankings affected by Mariusz Wach's UD12 win over Erkan Teper?
My vote: Wach and Teper remain unranked
Topic B - How are the rankings affected by Kubrat Pulev's UD12 win over Kevin Johnson?
My vote: Pulev remains at #6, Johnson remains unranked
Topic C - How are the rankings affected by Anthony Joshua's TKO11 win over Wladimir Klitschko
My vote: Joshua to #1, W.Klitschko to #9
My vote: Wach and Teper remain unranked
Topic B - How are the rankings affected by Kubrat Pulev's UD12 win over Kevin Johnson?
My vote: Pulev remains at #6, Johnson remains unranked
Topic C - How are the rankings affected by Anthony Joshua's TKO11 win over Wladimir Klitschko
My vote: Joshua to #1, W.Klitschko to #9
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Topic A - How are the rankings affected by Mariusz Wach's UD12 win over Erkan Teper?
My vote: Wach and Teper remain unranked
Topic B - How are the rankings affected by Kubrat Pulev's UD12 win over Kevin Johnson?
My vote: Pulev up to #4, Johnson remains unranked
Topic C - How are the rankings affected by Anthony Joshua's TKO11 win over Wladimir Klitschko
My vote: Joshua to #1, W.Klitschko to #3
My vote: Wach and Teper remain unranked
Topic B - How are the rankings affected by Kubrat Pulev's UD12 win over Kevin Johnson?
My vote: Pulev up to #4, Johnson remains unranked
Topic C - How are the rankings affected by Anthony Joshua's TKO11 win over Wladimir Klitschko
My vote: Joshua to #1, W.Klitschko to #3
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Wach 14, Pulev 4, Klitschko 1, Joshua champ
It means that #15 stays vacant right?
It means that #15 stays vacant right?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
And what about Stiverne?crusader wrote:Wach to 15, Teper out
Pulev to 5, Johnson out
Joshua to 1, Wlad to 2
Given Wlad's inactivity, which at 18 months typically bumps fighters completely out of ratings, and the fact that Wlad was beaten 8-4/9-3 in his previous fight, I think AJ falls short of being locked into champion status. In my view Wlad did not have a champion's torch to pass this time...
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
I assumed your original post was directed at me. If not me, then who?Sequitorian wrote:... who asked you? ...jezzamundo wrote:Why? I hardly see records as being a relevant measure of how good a fighter is and if anyone wanted to see the fighters' records, they could easily look them up. By doing so, they will see who they've fought, which is more useful information than a series of numbers.Sequitorian wrote:Always post the fighters' records next to their names when you do this ...
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
What about him?asdfjkl wrote:And what about Stiverne?crusader wrote:Wach to 15, Teper out
Pulev to 5, Johnson out
Joshua to 1, Wlad to 2
Given Wlad's inactivity, which at 18 months typically bumps fighters completely out of ratings, and the fact that Wlad was beaten 8-4/9-3 in his previous fight, I think AJ falls short of being locked into champion status. In my view Wlad did not have a champion's torch to pass this time...
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Seq is slow minded yet also feels very superior. He expected you to do what he said because he's important to himself.jezzamundo wrote:I assumed your original post was directed at me. If not me, then who?Sequitorian wrote:... who asked you? ...jezzamundo wrote:
Why? I hardly see records as being a relevant measure of how good a fighter is and if anyone wanted to see the fighters' records, they could easily look them up. By doing so, they will see who they've fought, which is more useful information than a series of numbers.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Pulev to #9, Joshua to champion, the rest remain the same.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
He's inactive since 2015 and still ranked here?! Isn't that odd? And Wlad had an excuse, since he was stuck with Tyson Fury, but Stiverne has all the choice in the world but simply doesn't do anything. He's just a sitting duck that keeps his ranks for some odd reason.crusader wrote:What about him?asdfjkl wrote:And what about Stiverne?crusader wrote:Wach to 15, Teper out
Pulev to 5, Johnson out
Joshua to 1, Wlad to 2
Given Wlad's inactivity, which at 18 months typically bumps fighters completely out of ratings, and the fact that Wlad was beaten 8-4/9-3 in his previous fight, I think AJ falls short of being locked into champion status. In my view Wlad did not have a champion's torch to pass this time...
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
I don't think Stiverne should be in the rankings at all, but apparently a vote was called on his position upon 12 months (I think) of inactivity, and the result was that he stayed in. In my opinion he should've been booted a while ago....
I certainly wouldn't promote anyone to champion for beating him!
I certainly wouldn't promote anyone to champion for beating him!
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Well he hasn't been sat on his hands. He was in Russia for his mandated WBC final eliminator, which was cancelled for a failed drugs test. You could argue that Stiverne was tied up with Povetkin as Wlad was tied up with Fury.asdfjkl wrote:He's inactive since 2015 and still ranked here?! Isn't that odd? And Wlad had an excuse, since he was stuck with Tyson Fury, but Stiverne has all the choice in the world but simply doesn't do anything. He's just a sitting duck that keeps his ranks for some odd reason.crusader wrote:What about him?asdfjkl wrote: And what about Stiverne?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Euh no, Wlad was tied up from day one after the fight, Stiverne was tied up for just a couple of weeks before the Povetkin match, probably knowing beforehand that the it was taken care of that the fight would never happen. That's also the reason why he was completely out of shape when coming in, despite he took illegal substances himself, somehow he's still in the WBC list, without fighting and with cheating.Rob3_142 wrote:Well he hasn't been sat on his hands. He was in Russia for his mandated WBC final eliminator, which was cancelled for a failed drugs test. You could argue that Stiverne was tied up with Povetkin as Wlad was tied up with Fury.asdfjkl wrote:He's inactive since 2015 and still ranked here?! Isn't that odd? And Wlad had an excuse, since he was stuck with Tyson Fury, but Stiverne has all the choice in the world but simply doesn't do anything. He's just a sitting duck that keeps his ranks for some odd reason.crusader wrote:
What about him?
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
That would be a weak argument IMO. He was in fighting shape (or at least his jiggly version) for Povetkin and easily could have booked something for a few weeks later. He also had quite a lot of time before the Povetkin bout (which was in November) to fight someone...and has had quite a bit of time after as well.Rob3_142 wrote:Well he hasn't been sat on his hands. He was in Russia for his mandated WBC final eliminator, which was cancelled for a failed drugs test. You could argue that Stiverne was tied up with Povetkin as Wlad was tied up with Fury.asdfjkl wrote:He's inactive since 2015 and still ranked here?! Isn't that odd? And Wlad had an excuse, since he was stuck with Tyson Fury, but Stiverne has all the choice in the world but simply doesn't do anything. He's just a sitting duck that keeps his ranks for some odd reason.crusader wrote:
What about him?
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Well it wasn't his promotion. He wasn't going to just take Rabiansky's promotion and turn it into his own. Nor could he just drum up an event in the States at short notice.punchoutsb wrote:That would be a weak argument IMO. He was in fighting shape (or at least his jiggly version) for Povetkin and easily could have booked something for a few weeks later. He also had quite a lot of time before the Povetkin bout (which was in November) to fight someone...and has had quite a bit of time after as well.Rob3_142 wrote:Well he hasn't been sat on his hands. He was in Russia for his mandated WBC final eliminator, which was cancelled for a failed drugs test. You could argue that Stiverne was tied up with Povetkin as Wlad was tied up with Fury.asdfjkl wrote: He's inactive since 2015 and still ranked here?! Isn't that odd? And Wlad had an excuse, since he was stuck with Tyson Fury, but Stiverne has all the choice in the world but simply doesn't do anything. He's just a sitting duck that keeps his ranks for some odd reason.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Yeah...that's why I said a few weeks laterRob3_142 wrote:Well it wasn't his promotion. He wasn't going to just take Rabiansky's promotion and turn it into his own. Nor could he just drum up an event in the States at short notice.punchoutsb wrote:That would be a weak argument IMO. He was in fighting shape (or at least his jiggly version) for Povetkin and easily could have booked something for a few weeks later. He also had quite a lot of time before the Povetkin bout (which was in November) to fight someone...and has had quite a bit of time after as well.Rob3_142 wrote:
Well he hasn't been sat on his hands. He was in Russia for his mandated WBC final eliminator, which was cancelled for a failed drugs test. You could argue that Stiverne was tied up with Povetkin as Wlad was tied up with Fury.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Even so, a few weeks later to book a venue, find an opponent, to sell tickets and promote the event? If you said a 6-8 weeks then I'd agree. There's nothing really to gain ranking wise, as with Povetkin out the frame, he will be instilled as the mandatory challenger anyway. That being said, it would be nice to have a keep busy fight if he;s in shape. Perhaps he could have been on the Wilder undercard.punchoutsb wrote:Yeah...that's why I said a few weeks laterRob3_142 wrote:Well it wasn't his promotion. He wasn't going to just take Rabiansky's promotion and turn it into his own. Nor could he just drum up an event in the States at short notice.punchoutsb wrote:
That would be a weak argument IMO. He was in fighting shape (or at least his jiggly version) for Povetkin and easily could have booked something for a few weeks later. He also had quite a lot of time before the Povetkin bout (which was in November) to fight someone...and has had quite a bit of time after as well.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
I guess the point I'm making is he had 12 months of inactivity following his thrilling edge of Derrick Rossy and the Povetkin non-fight, then has had six months of inactivity following the Povetkin non-fight. But as you say, why fight when you're already installed as mandatory anyway? Stiverne is fat, lazy, and untalented. He's been gifted his only accomplishments as a pro (Arreola x2) and has once again been gifted with a chance to challenge for a belt. He should not be in the rankings, and even if he had not been inactive he should not be in the rankings.Rob3_142 wrote:Even so, a few weeks later to book a venue, find an opponent, to sell tickets and promote the event? If you said a 6-8 weeks then I'd agree. There's nothing really to gain ranking wise, as with Povetkin out the frame, he will be instilled as the mandatory challenger anyway. That being said, it would be nice to have a keep busy fight if he;s in shape. Perhaps he could have been on the Wilder undercard.punchoutsb wrote:Yeah...that's why I said a few weeks laterRob3_142 wrote:
Well it wasn't his promotion. He wasn't going to just take Rabiansky's promotion and turn it into his own. Nor could he just drum up an event in the States at short notice.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
100% agree, but the WBC are not on their own. I mean Parker is just about to fight Cojanu for the WBO. Granted a late replacement for Hughie, but how on earth is he in the WBO top 15? All governing bodies have their own embarrassing group of hopeless potential world title challengers.punchoutsb wrote:I guess the point I'm making is he had 12 months of inactivity following his thrilling edge of Derrick Rossy and the Povetkin non-fight, then has had six months of inactivity following the Povetkin non-fight. But as you say, why fight when you're already installed as mandatory anyway? Stiverne is fat, lazy, and untalented. He's been gifted his only accomplishments as a pro (Arreola x2) and has once again been gifted with a chance to challenge for a belt. He should not be in the rankings, and even if he had not been inactive he should not be in the rankings.Rob3_142 wrote:Even so, a few weeks later to book a venue, find an opponent, to sell tickets and promote the event? If you said a 6-8 weeks then I'd agree. There's nothing really to gain ranking wise, as with Povetkin out the frame, he will be instilled as the mandatory challenger anyway. That being said, it would be nice to have a keep busy fight if he;s in shape. Perhaps he could have been on the Wilder undercard.punchoutsb wrote:
Yeah...that's why I said a few weeks later
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Stiverne had already been inactive for over a year going into the cancelled Povetkin fight
Boo hoo for him (also a positive PED tester) that it didnt happen, but I think it's up to him to get the wins to keep himself rated. His only win since 2014 was over a C level fighter who put him on his ass.
Boo hoo for him (also a positive PED tester) that it didnt happen, but I think it's up to him to get the wins to keep himself rated. His only win since 2014 was over a C level fighter who put him on his ass.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Stiverne is at max equal to Mike Perez at this moment and probably even worse.