GGG vs Canelo set to September 16

[Impractical Poster]

Canelo is too good to let GGG dominate him and he is very tough to get easily knocked out. Dont kid yourself, this is a very competitive fight. GGG should edge it due to workrate, although at 160 as in his last fight at 164 Canelo will not get out of breath like at 154.

If he isn't already getting backed up against the ropes, I expect Canelo to back himself into the ropes more and more as the fight goes on. It's how he takes his breathers. Chavez was unable to take advantage of this, but it's where G prefers his opponents.

[verlichte]

I'm not insulting. I was just trying to figure out how you came to the conclusion. You are usually a "fact" guy. So, it surprises me that you took this stance.

Nobody's butthurt. Everybody gets it wrong from time to time. You are welcome to your turn, as rare as it may be...

Am I wrong about the main point that I've focussed on in this thread or did you decide to side-step this matter?

What was your main point?

OK, so you weren't paying attention, but that didn't stop you from expressing criticism.

Good for you kid!

[Impractical Poster]

Am I wrong about the main point that I've focussed on in this thread or did you decide to side-step this matter?

What was your main point?

OK, so you weren't paying attention, but that didn't stop you from expressing criticism.

Good for you kid!

Don't get upset. I came into the conversation with you stating Canelo' s workrate was higher than Golovkin's. I was just questioning how you came to that conclusion. I don't really care what your original point was as I was interested in the workrate issue. If you take my curiosity as criticism, that is on you. I, like most others, feel that Canelo is fairly conservation with his output. Just wondering if I'm missing something in my observation.... kid.

[verlichte]

What was your main point?

OK, so you weren't paying attention, but that didn't stop you from expressing criticism.

Good for you kid!

Don't get upset. I came into the conversation with you stating Canelo' s workrate was higher than Golovkin's. I was just questioning how you came to that conclusion. I don't really care what your original point was as I was interested in the workrate issue. If you take my curiosity as criticism, that is on you. I, like most others, feel that Canelo is fairly conservation with his output. Just wondering if I'm missing something in my observation.... kid.

Are you seriously claiming that you didn't criticise me in this thread... kid?

[Impractical Poster]

OK, so you weren't paying attention, but that didn't stop you from expressing criticism.

Good for you kid!

Don't get upset. I came into the conversation with you stating Canelo' s workrate was higher than Golovkin's. I was just questioning how you came to that conclusion. I don't really care what your original point was as I was interested in the workrate issue. If you take my curiosity as criticism, that is on you. I, like most others, feel that Canelo is fairly conservation with his output. Just wondering if I'm missing something in my observation.... kid.

Are you seriously claiming that you didn't criticise me in this thread... kid?

Dang man... Now there you go making me feel sorry for you.

[Badhusker]

GGG will have to KO Canelo to win.