Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2730
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by SAPFO »

We talk about 'era' in boxing all the time. Lets have a boxing time machine, and chuck a few prime boxers in it.

Take a fighter, and move him into another decade. How does he compete. Discuss.

I'll start with an obvious example. prime Calzaghi, to the 90's. Him & prime RJJ (albeit juiced to the gills) would have been great. Not to mentioned the prime Benn, Eubank & Collins fights.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46623
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by gilgamesh »

I foam at the mouth at the thought of seeing Bobby Chacon in the mix with Erik Morales, Barrera, Marquez and Pacquiao.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Stuarty »

Barrera and Morales in today's featherweight division would be excellent.
TheGingerBomber
Lightweight
Posts: 1233
Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by TheGingerBomber »

Unstoppable George Foreman in the time of Bowe, Holyfield, Lewis, etc. I mean prime grilled.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Stuarty »

Almost a cliché the amount you hear this but a prime Ali v a prime Tyson is most boxing fans wet dream :bag:
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by littlepug »

naz v pacman and froch v Eubank would do nicely
Douglas Pink
Super Lightweight
Posts: 17
Joined: 24 Dec 2016, 07:11

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Douglas Pink »

Hearns V Mayweather at 147 pounds
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2730
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by SAPFO »

littlepug wrote:naz v pacman and froch v Eubank would do nicely

Froch vs Benn

Benn/Eubank vs Kessler

Prime JC vs Ward (it'd be boring I reckon)

I'm hovering over 168/175 ain't I. Okay,...

McClellan vs GGG
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32853
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Stuarty30 wrote:Almost a cliché the amount you hear this but a prime Ali v a prime Tyson is most boxing fans wet dream :bag:
I honestly don't think that would have been a particularly good fight - prime Ali would have schooled prime Tyson imo.

Prime Tyson v prime Frazier? Now you're talking.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Ossyrules »

SAPFO wrote:We talk about 'era' in boxing all the time. Lets have a boxing time machine, and chuck a few prime boxers in it.

Take a fighter, and move him into another decade. How does he compete. Discuss.

I'll start with an obvious example. prime Calzaghi, to the 90's. Him & prime RJJ (albeit juiced to the gills) would have been great. Not to mentioned the prime Benn, Eubank & Collins fights.
Roy beats joe fairly comfortably imo in that fight
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Ossyrules »

Douglas Pink wrote:Hearns V Mayweather at 147 pounds
Hearns takes this one, and dominates Floyd whilst he's at it.

Mayweathers not knocking Hearns out, and he's not even hurting him either. Those who beats Hearns (whilst he was still a force) did it through aggression. A guy with Hearns physical advantages doesn't get outboxed. Ray Leonard couldn't do it, and Leonard was bigger and stronger than Floyd, with a bigger punch and more naturally attacking. Ray Leonard couldn't out box tommy. He did it through getting rough and toughing it out, making it a scrap. Floyd hasn't got that in his locker
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Ossyrules »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Almost a cliché the amount you hear this but a prime Ali v a prime Tyson is most boxing fans wet dream :bag:
I honestly don't think that would have been a particularly good fight - prime Ali would have schooled prime Tyson imo.

Prime Tyson v prime Frazier? Now you're talking.
Based on the success Frazier had vs Ali you'd have to say Tyson has a shot. He's bigger than Frazier, quicker and two handed. He has a good shot in this one but I'd agree Ali is favourite
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11974
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Taansend »

Stanley Ketchel in the early 80's. Fights against Hagler, Hearns, Roldan, Mugabi, Sibson etc etc would have been mouth watering.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11974
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Taansend »

Ossyrules wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Almost a cliché the amount you hear this but a prime Ali v a prime Tyson is most boxing fans wet dream :bag:
I honestly don't think that would have been a particularly good fight - prime Ali would have schooled prime Tyson imo.

Prime Tyson v prime Frazier? Now you're talking.
Based on the success Frazier had vs Ali you'd have to say Tyson has a shot. He's bigger than Frazier, quicker and two handed. He has a good shot in this one but I'd agree Ali is favourite
When I think of a 'prime' Ali I think the year or two before his enforced absence. Ali was still great when he fought Frazier but past his prime in my humble opinion.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Ossyrules »

Taansend wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
I honestly don't think that would have been a particularly good fight - prime Ali would have schooled prime Tyson imo.

Prime Tyson v prime Frazier? Now you're talking.
Based on the success Frazier had vs Ali you'd have to say Tyson has a shot. He's bigger than Frazier, quicker and two handed. He has a good shot in this one but I'd agree Ali is favourite
When I think of a 'prime' Ali I think the year or two before his enforced absence. Ali was still great when he fought Frazier but past his prime in my humble opinion.
That's a fair assumption imo
Impractical Poster
Middleweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Impractical Poster »

Stuarty30 wrote:Barrera and Morales in today's featherweight division would be excellent.
Barrera and Morales in any era's FW division would be excellent.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Stuarty »

Impractical Poster wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Barrera and Morales in today's featherweight division would be excellent.
Barrera and Morales in any era's FW division would be excellent.
True mate :TU:
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by ElJefe »

Ossyrules wrote:
Douglas Pink wrote:Hearns V Mayweather at 147 pounds
Hearns takes this one, and dominates Floyd whilst he's at it.

Mayweathers not knocking Hearns out, and he's not even hurting him either. Those who beats Hearns (whilst he was still a force) did it through aggression. A guy with Hearns physical advantages doesn't get outboxed. Ray Leonard couldn't do it, and Leonard was bigger and stronger than Floyd, with a bigger punch and more naturally attacking. Ray Leonard couldn't out box tommy. He did it through getting rough and toughing it out, making it a scrap. Floyd hasn't got that in his locker
All the things you've mentioned are probably why it's right up the top of my list. I'd love to see how Mayweather would approach it. On paper Hearns is an absolute nightmare for him. And you didn't even have to mention probably the single best punch 147 has ever seen in The Hitman's right hand!
TheGingerBomber
Lightweight
Posts: 1233
Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by TheGingerBomber »

Pacqiao vs Duran.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11974
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Taansend »

TheGingerBomber wrote:Pacqiao vs Duran.
2009 Pacquiao v 1980 Duran :clap:
TheGingerBomber
Lightweight
Posts: 1233
Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by TheGingerBomber »

Taansend wrote:
TheGingerBomber wrote:Pacqiao vs Duran.
2009 Pacquiao v 1980 Duran :clap:
Stuff of dreams.
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2730
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by SAPFO »

Taansend wrote:
TheGingerBomber wrote:Pacqiao vs Duran.
2009 Pacquiao v 1980 Duran :clap:

09 Pacman vs 09 Floyd was one of the biggest travesties in the history of boxing. The biggest fight never to happen. Think PacMan edges that one back then.

Amazing to think Duran had a 33 year pro career. He still does the round now during meet & greets. Surely he made enough from over 100 fights to taker it easy.
Stuffs
Welterweight
Posts: 611
Joined: 29 Jun 2016, 06:28

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Stuffs »

Dunno about you guys but I'm thinking Ali v AJ. What about yous?

The greatest of all time, and Muhammad Ali, together in the ring in front of 90,000 at Wembley with AJ blasting out Ali with some of his hardcore blaster punches while the crowd roar the young lion to victory in the first round, the pangs of Sweet Caroline still in everyone's mind. A victory for all of Great Britain, keeping Britain both great, and humble.

Any chance of an RT Eddie?
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by BitPlayer »

Rocky Marcino Vs Today's Cruiserweights
Manchester Massive
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 371
Joined: 29 May 2008, 18:34

Re: Boxrec Boxing Time Machine

Post by Manchester Massive »

Salvador Sanchez v Lomachenko
Hagler v Roy Jones Junior
SRL V Mayweather
Tyson v Foreman
Chavez v Duran
Post Reply