man wrote:OP, you are really wrong on several issues.
first, floyd mayweather was not a boring
boxer, he just was a defensive counter
puncher. wlad was boring, floyd was not
and i say this as one of his critics. i for
one believe he managed to get credit for
inactivity, which i find unfair, but it ain't
easy to make judges believe that you being
inactive is worth points.
secondly, repeated PPV records speak volumes.
he was for many years THE draw in boxing
and not many people in boxing history could
say they achieved such status.
floyd vs mcgregor is a stupid, but very easy fight
for floyd and as much as i despise it as a bout,
from a business perspective it seems to make
supersense for either man.
You are wrong on all 3 points.
Floyd was boring. He had always problems with his hands, thats why he rarely threw punches. His strategy was always "run, shoulder roll, jab, wrestle, elbow, hug, every now and than cross", the seconde he changed from prety boy to money he was boring. The only fights he wasnt boring were when his opponents were aggressiv and tried to make a fight, rather than run to a ud. Floyd did just enough to win a round, which is boring.
Adrien broner is a bigger draw in boxing than rigondeaux or gonzales. That does not make him a better boxer than those 2. I totaly dont care how much money another man makes, all i want to see is a good fight when i turn on the tv to watch boxing.
I also dont care if it makes super sense for conor and floyd. I dont get any money so why should i care? It also makes super sense for a robber to robe a bank and make quick 100.000 $. Same as the bank robbery the may con fight is a robbery. The second time floyd will robb fans, first robbery was obviously may pac.