UKAD

Post Reply
kbackup408
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1663
Joined: 08 Sep 2016, 12:58

UKAD

Post by kbackup408 »

Honestly lads this whole Tyson Fury situation is a joke had a quick look online and saw that the final decision would be made in October.

Regardless of how long Fury takes to get the weight down I think the way they have handled the situation is poor not just for Fury but it's making the UK look bad into how they manage drug related situation.

What do you lads think ?
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: UKAD

Post by mullenman »

Agreed 100%.



Total joke. It's not a mysterious murder they have to solve
kbackup408
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1663
Joined: 08 Sep 2016, 12:58

Re: UKAD

Post by kbackup408 »

mullenman wrote:Agreed 100%.



Total joke. It's not a mysterious murder they have to solve
Honestly pal was talking about this at work and even the Fury sceptics felt this was shady
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: UKAD

Post by BitPlayer »

Someone had a conflict of interest. Why does that require a 5 month delay? :brick:
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: UKAD

Post by samwbr »

BitPlayer wrote:Someone had a conflict of interest. Why does that require a 5 month delay? :brick:
Why have they only just discovered it?
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: UKAD

Post by Oiky »

UKAD don't know their alive

Not a brain cell between them it seems

Seems more than likely they are working some sort of trick against Tyson
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23224
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: UKAD

Post by handsofstone »

Effing hopeless,
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32962
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: UKAD

Post by Boxerbeetle »

God only knows what's going on. Odd that the Furys haven't been particularly vocal about it though. You'd imagine an innocent person would kick up an enormous fuss about it taking so long. I suspect there are loads of machinations and accusations going on behind the scenes, leading to a kind of deadlock.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: UKAD

Post by crusader »

Question from someone who knows very little about this type of thing. Let's say Hughie got a ban from UKAD. What exactly stops him from, say, fighting in New Zealand against Parker?

Is it because the WBO would presumably drop him? Is BBBofC approval needed for the bout, and would the UKAD ban preclude that? Would it be against the law? All of the above?
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8627
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: UKAD

Post by coneye »

No discisions , been made , all been dragged out , no court case for restraint of earnings , lot more going on than whats being released
dirk2686
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1982
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 09:35

Re: UKAD

Post by dirk2686 »

My take on it is that both parties are at fault. Hughie and Tyson both failing drug tests so close to one another, plus Tyson's failure to respond to further testing requests, are clearly difficult issues to just sweep aside.

UKAD however have made a complete hash of the investigation and the scenario still could pan out with Fury being licensed to have a world title fight having failed a drug test. I can see heads rolling and I imagine that may have played a significant part in the delayed process.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: UKAD

Post by samwbr »

coneye wrote:No discisions , been made , all been dragged out , no court case for restraint of earnings , lot more going on than whats being released
Nothing's been released officially has it?
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8627
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: UKAD

Post by coneye »

samwbr wrote:
coneye wrote:No discisions , been made , all been dragged out , no court case for restraint of earnings , lot more going on than whats being released
Nothing's been released officially has it?
Excatly ... Thats my point
Post Reply