More censorship from Box Rec

boxingchat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26

More censorship from Box Rec

Post by boxingchat »

A perfectly valid subject get's taken off again. I thought communism was dead!

Why is it only Warren can be slagged off on here?

Billy GRahsm made a complete mess of a simple thing and you sweep it under the carpet (Which you probably got from Papa Hatton)

Put it back on Boxrec, you're pathetic.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

You know where the door is, and take Lirva with you while you're at it.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: More censorship from Box Rec

Post by MightyWarrior »

boxingchat wrote:
Why is it only Warren can be slagged off on here?
No, everyone gets slagged off here on a first come first served basis.

You just have to get in line :TU:

And no idea what post you're talking about - your Billy Graham post appears here as well.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Post by Deserter »

nickd wrote:You know where the door is, and take Lirva with you while you're at it.
Absolutely :TU:
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Re: More censorship from Box Rec

Post by KOJOE90 »

boxingchat wrote:Put it back on Boxrec, you're pathetic.
What thread are you talking about?
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped :lol:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27494
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

No idea also.
boxingchat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26

Post by boxingchat »

steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped :lol:
Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

boxingchat wrote:
steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped :lol:
Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
Stop trying to worm out of it and admit you've made a complete twat of yourself yet again. :lol: :lol:
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Post by J »

boxingchat wrote:
steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped :lol:
Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
i hope steve meets you one day and fornicating pokes these words down your throat.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

J wrote:
boxingchat wrote:
steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped :lol:
Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
i hope steve meets you one day and fornicating pokes these words down your throat.
You fantasise about Steve giving Boxingchat a throat job?
Goz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:17

Post by Goz »

Pro-Warren prick has some front accusing someone else of censorship.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Post by J »

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
J wrote:
boxingchat wrote: Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
i hope steve meets you one day and fornicating pokes these words down your throat.
You fantasise about Steve giving Boxingchat a throat job?
no i dont but i do find referrIng to someones incarceration and poking fun at it offensive.
lirva33
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by lirva33 »

im on boxingchats side here.

the mods have a lot to answer for for their actions.

Steve should know better than to take a pop. He should expect a pop back.

Lirva.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Post by J »

Steve's reponse was boxing related not personal.

boxing chats response is out of line.

end of.
Loynesy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1767
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 08:29

Post by Loynesy »

Agreed - Steve made a light hearted reference and in response had someone responding with a personal insult from the safety of a keyboard.
Goz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:17

Post by Goz »

I think Lirva is fully aware of that guys and:

1 - Is either Boxingchat himself or

2 - Just being a prick for the sake of it
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Post by Neri »

lirva33 wrote:im on boxingchats side here.
That goes without saying, considering you and boxingchat are the same person.
Freiheit
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2852
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

Post by Freiheit »

Lirva and boxingchat are not the same person, posting from different IP numbers
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Post by TerribleTerry »

Loynesy wrote:Agreed - Steve made a light hearted reference and in response had someone responding with a personal insult from the safety of a keyboard.
The internet is full of 'keyboard warriors' like BC. :cry:

I doubt Steve gets wound up by his lame taunts. BC is a fool and has been shown up as such on here more times then I care to remember.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Every heard of a proxy server?
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

Freiheit wrote:Lirva and boxingchat are not the same person, posting from different IP numbers
That proves nothing! Its easy for the same person to post from 2 different IP addresses if they want to.

How about banning both of 'their' IP addresses and be done with it?
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Post by The Law »

Freiheit wrote:Lirva and boxingchat are not the same person, posting from different IP numbers
Which isn't hard to do via an anonymous proxy .......

........ btw my other username is Freiheit, I occasionally use a Scandinavian proxy. So in a sense I'm replying to myself :wink:

Denne lag er frygtelig :TU:
Freiheit
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2852
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

Post by Freiheit »

Dont know any about proxy servers, but fact is that within 3 minutes boxingchat posted, then lirva then boxingchat, and the two IPs were different.

Lag???
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Post by The Law »

Freiheit wrote:Dont know any about proxy servers, but fact is that within 3 minutes boxingchat posted, then lirva then boxingchat, and the two IPs were different.

Lag???
There's always a lag with proxy servers. The connection is never quite the same speed as your normal connection.

jeez, why am I replying to myself again? :lol:
Post Reply