Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

For RBR threads only

Brook vs. Spencer Winner?

Poll ended at 03 Feb 2017, 03:27

Kell Brook
66
44%
Errol Spence
83
56%
 
Total votes: 149

pablothunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1155
Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 07:38

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by pablothunder »

Finn wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Finn wrote:Not a fan of quiting like that
You'd better be fvcking joking
No he used the eye as an excuse.
I disagree.
I won money on Spence tonight, but that was a close fight and Brook wasn't running his way out of there in my eyes.
Last edited by pablothunder on 27 May 2017, 18:36, edited 2 times in total.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by lefty »

Everyone keeps calling him Spencer :lol:
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by Deno1986 »

Nightmare Roy wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:Spence up on all 3 cards. Froch can't score a fight to save his life
Great fighter but he's useless at this gig.
Does he get led by Smith I wonder? It's bloody woeful either way.
babyjesus
Welterweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 04 Mar 2016, 21:06

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by babyjesus »

did it go over or under the 10-
darkstar81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by darkstar81 »

Finn wrote:
darkstar81 wrote:
Finn wrote:Not a fan of quiting like that
You'd prefer Brook to fight half blind and damage the eye further would you?
The corner didn't pull him out and the ref didn't even get the doctor look at it. He quite so he didn't take more punishment.
Yes, he quit so he didn't take any more punishment to his eye. You would prefer he didn't quit then take more punishment and damage his eye further?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by lefty »

Brook doesnt deserve some of the criticism he's received from some.
rossij8
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by rossij8 »

The fight is Khan and he'd still box his tits off and knock him out
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by gilgamesh »

Fearful_Freddie wrote:That Golovkin fight has seriously damaged him. Massive respect to Kell though.
I think he can still definitely come back and rebuild his career at 154, but I'd recommend he just fights some soft touch opponents for his first few fights to ease himself into the division and let his eyes heal up proper.

He's a very good fighter, and both of his losses have been in respectable efforts where he put on a good fight. His fans and Boxing fans in general I think will certainly understand if he takes a few easy fights in the remainder of this year and maybe he can put together a big fight with Khan around this time next year.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by lefty »

Eddie getting booed again :lol: :lol:
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Really good fight. Credit to both!
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by Deno1986 »

babyjesus wrote:did it go over or under the 10-
It finished after 1 min 40 of round 10
Last edited by Deno1986 on 27 May 2017, 18:39, edited 2 times in total.
sammy95
Middleweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 20 Nov 2013, 16:18

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by sammy95 »

Deno1986 wrote:
sammy95 wrote:Judges had Spence up by five, three, and one.

One, correct as per my scorecard. Three understandable, so many close rounds. Five, wrong.
No it wasn't. Plenty here had Spence up by 4/5+
Most of the first six were tight rounds, but five ahead is wrong. Those scorecards suggest Brook only won 2/3 rounds
manchester-mexican
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 247
Joined: 15 Jul 2007, 11:18

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by manchester-mexican »

wesshaw1985 wrote:
manchester-mexican wrote:Rocky would have fought on
Rocky from Stocky?[/quotee
Close fight but thot Brook should have went for it n see if he could trouble Spence n turn the tide
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16398
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Deno1986 wrote:
Nightmare Roy wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:Spence up on all 3 cards. Froch can't score a fight to save his life
Great fighter but he's useless at this gig.
Does he get led by Smith I wonder? It's bloody woeful either way.
The whole of the sky team are poor IMO, just blow smoke up the house fighters a$$ all night and spout out cheesy clichés all fackin night long
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32661
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Finn wrote:
darkstar81 wrote:
Finn wrote:Not a fan of quiting like that
You'd prefer Brook to fight half blind and damage the eye further would you?
The corner didn't pull him out and the ref didn't even get the doctor look at it. He quite so he didn't take more punishment.
I hope you're drunk, because otherwise that is a terrible, terrible post :shame:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 22985
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by handsofstone »

Gutted for Brook, imagine his eye going again, it must have been a nightmare to deal with and painful if it made him quit, he showed massive heart again though to have that last final push, it was do or die but Spence was just too sharp for him, I had Spence Jr up by 5 rounds at the end, I thought it was a great fight, real high level boxing from both guys there was a lot of top level fighting going on from both men, Brook looked best when he was bullying Spence at mid range and Spence looked a bit troubled at times when Kell landed, I was surprised that Brook was able to outspeed him early doors but as expected Kell faded and the eye hindered him, Brook's countering early on was on point as well

Spence showed a lot of grit as well, he had the toughest test of his career, lost a few rounds but got in the driven seat and on my card won everything after the 5th and after putting Brook down he got the finish, quality fight between 2 class acts, Brook has no need to stay at welter now, hopefully he moves up and hopefully theres no accusations of him being a quitter
Last edited by handsofstone on 27 May 2017, 18:39, edited 1 time in total.
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by daviddee »

darkstar81 wrote:
Finn wrote:
darkstar81 wrote:
You'd prefer Brook to fight half blind and damage the eye further would you?
The corner didn't pull him out and the ref didn't even get the doctor look at it. He quite so he didn't take more punishment.
Yes, he quit so he didn't take any more punishment to his eye. You would prefer he didn't quit then take more punishment and damage his eye further?
He done the right thing in quitting no doubt just didn't see that in him.. Spence Jnr is special
darkstar81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by darkstar81 »

Bellew is an idiot
babyjesus
Welterweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 04 Mar 2016, 21:06

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by babyjesus »

Deno1986 wrote:
babyjesus wrote:did it go over or under the 10-
It went +10.5
17 damn seconds
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by Finn »

Sorry but Bellew and even Kel himself just admitted he quit.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22330
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by Horse »

Brook did what against Shawn Porter?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by lefty »

I do think the weight played somewhat of a part there. He noticeably slowed in the second half.

Both Bellew and Khan sounding like massive pudenda.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by Stuarty »

Gutted for Brook. Quality high level fight. Brook looked excellent and was boxing well the first half of the fight. From round 7 onward Brook looked like he was tiring. Spence is a class act. Hopefully they make the Thurman fight next.
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by Baboon »

darkstar81 wrote:Bellew is an idiot
Yes, and Khan is an opportunistic pudendum, calling him a quitter.....
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017

Post by Finn »

daviddee wrote:
darkstar81 wrote:
Finn wrote:
The corner didn't pull him out and the ref didn't even get the doctor look at it. He quite so he didn't take more punishment.
Yes, he quit so he didn't take any more punishment to his eye. You would prefer he didn't quit then take more punishment and damage his eye further?
He done the right thing in quitting no doubt just didn't see that in him.. Spence Jnr is special
Nah bullshit is he victor Ortiz now. He quit.
Post Reply