Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7465
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
The first one did only 165K buys and was considered a commercial failure. It's doubtful the sequel will do much better. Yet this is still on PPV, which means HBO's boxing budget has been so severely slashed that we're unlikely to ever see a "big" fight on the network again in the near future. Never mind the fact that, even when limiting themselves to smaller budget cards, they've still only had like 3 or 4 non-PPV cards on the network this year.
I've never been a "sky is falling" type but I'm starting to get pretty concerned with the sport's future in the US.
I've never been a "sky is falling" type but I'm starting to get pretty concerned with the sport's future in the US.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
HBO is definitely backing off, but ward has a crazy contract with rocnation that HBO wouldn't meet. The sport is fairly dead here, but it will always have a pulse.
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
Its similar to Crawford/Postol or the top rank ppv a couple of months ago. when your paying guys a certain amount and its more than the license fee it has to be on ppv. Simple economics.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
Not the same at all.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9455
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
This fight will do more than 165,000 like the first.
I'm predicting 225-250,000.
Numbers still suck but considerably higher
I'm predicting 225-250,000.
Numbers still suck but considerably higher
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7465
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
I don't really understand how the fight is economically viable. It doesn't seem like the PPV revenue will be sufficient to pay the guaranteed purses, let alone other costs.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
Rocnation will lose money, duva will do ok. There is no buzz for the fight, I'm sure they would be thrilled at 200k.jujigatame wrote:I don't really understand how the fight is economically viable. It doesn't seem like the PPV revenue will be sufficient to pay the guaranteed purses, let alone other costs.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
If Kovalev was fighting a Mexican or an exciting American fighter, they would sell well. Only hardcore fans are watching Ward, and many of them do it via streams. I predict a number under 150K, probably around 100-120K.
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
The way Kovalev acted like a child when he lost surely put people off, who wants to pay to see him choke again? They'll be lucky to equal the first fight's numbers, which were abysmal.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
Kovalev doesn't draw because of his poor English. What is Ward's excuse? Ah, those moron fans don't understand his styleSFW wrote:The way Kovalev acted like a child when he lost surely put people off, who wants to pay to see him choke again? They'll be lucky to equal the first fight's numbers, which were abysmal.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
This one is $65+ tax. I think that's $15 more but I don't remember exactly.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
Why do some of you keep talking about speaking English as a selling point? It's inherently false.boxing_rocks wrote:Kovalev doesn't draw because of his poor English. What is Ward's excuse? Ah, those moron fans don't understand his styleSFW wrote:The way Kovalev acted like a child when he lost surely put people off, who wants to pay to see him choke again? They'll be lucky to equal the first fight's numbers, which were abysmal.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
No, it is not. Kovalev and Golovkin are not connecting to most of casual fans because of their broken language. Different culture doesn't help either.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Why do some of you keep talking about speaking English as a selling point? It's inherently false.boxing_rocks wrote:Kovalev doesn't draw because of his poor English. What is Ward's excuse? Ah, those moron fans don't understand his styleSFW wrote:The way Kovalev acted like a child when he lost surely put people off, who wants to pay to see him choke again? They'll be lucky to equal the first fight's numbers, which were abysmal.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
Ggg sells out all the time. It's boxing that isn't popular. He's a bigger draw than any American.boxing_rocks wrote:No, it is not. Kovalev and Golovkin are not connecting to most of casual fans because of their broken language. Different culture doesn't help either.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Why do some of you keep talking about speaking English as a selling point? It's inherently false.boxing_rocks wrote:
Kovalev doesn't draw because of his poor English. What is Ward's excuse? Ah, those moron fans don't understand his style
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
This PPV isn't going to sell very well.
There are a couple of good matchups on the card (Bivol-Agnew and Magomedov-Arias) but there will also be the boring runner Rigo and Andre "arm-clamp and clinch" Ward.
And the price is too high, it should cost no more than $50 at the most.
There are a couple of good matchups on the card (Bivol-Agnew and Magomedov-Arias) but there will also be the boring runner Rigo and Andre "arm-clamp and clinch" Ward.
And the price is too high, it should cost no more than $50 at the most.
Last edited by Freedom2013 on 12 Jun 2017, 20:37, edited 1 time in total.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
He sells out arenas, but not PPVs.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ggg sells out all the time. It's boxing that isn't popular. He's a bigger draw than any American.boxing_rocks wrote:No, it is not. Kovalev and Golovkin are not connecting to most of casual fans because of their broken language. Different culture doesn't help either.SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Why do some of you keep talking about speaking English as a selling point? It's inherently false.
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7465
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
I don't think language is the issue. Pacquiao never spoke great English but he still got mega-popular here.
Boxing is just becoming more and more of a niche sport here. To get famous as a fighter now you have to turn yourself into some kind of obnoxious cartoon character who can be loved/hated in equal measure.
Boxing is just becoming more and more of a niche sport here. To get famous as a fighter now you have to turn yourself into some kind of obnoxious cartoon character who can be loved/hated in equal measure.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
He sells more PPV's than any American does.boxing_rocks wrote:He sells out arenas, but not PPVs.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ggg sells out all the time. It's boxing that isn't popular. He's a bigger draw than any American.boxing_rocks wrote:
No, it is not. Kovalev and Golovkin are not connecting to most of casual fans because of their broken language. Different culture doesn't help either.
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7465
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
Agreed, I'd pay $50 but $65 is a shade too high for me considering the mediocrity of the undercard.Freedom2013 wrote:This PPV isn't going to sell very well.
There are a couple of good matchups on the card (Bivol-Agnew and Magomedov-Arias) but there will also be the boring runner Rigo and Andre "arm-clamp and clinch" Ward.
And the price is too high, it should cost more than $50 at the most.
But really I don't think price affects overall PPV buy numbers all that much. Only a very small number of hardcore fans are looking at every undercard fight and coming up with some theoretical price they think the PPV is worth. Most are just deciding "do I really wanna see this main event or not".
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
Yeah, undercards have always contributed minimally. That's probably why they've gotten progressively worse through the years. I'm not buying this one because I'm buying Bellator. Putting on 3 title fights and two legend bouts deserves my $50 and I'm not dealing with the ridiculous bills I used to with a Boxing, UFC and Pride every month!jujigatame wrote:Agreed, I'd pay $50 but $65 is a shade too high for me considering the mediocrity of the undercard.Freedom2013 wrote:This PPV isn't going to sell very well.
There are a couple of good matchups on the card (Bivol-Agnew and Magomedov-Arias) but there will also be the boring runner Rigo and Andre "arm-clamp and clinch" Ward.
And the price is too high, it should cost more than $50 at the most.
But really I don't think price affects overall PPV buy numbers all that much. Only a very small number of hardcore fans are looking at every undercard fight and coming up with some theoretical price they think the PPV is worth. Most are just deciding "do I really wanna see this main event or not".
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1634
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
Kovalev English way better than GGG, Actually Kovalev speaks English fine. Different culture now thats something different. Me personally I am more into watching good talent fight than just personalities, so I have been watching for example people who speak other languages fight for years , if they don't speak English, it isn't a big deal to me that might not be the case for your average fan.boxing_rocks wrote:No, it is not. Kovalev and Golovkin are not connecting to most of casual fans because of their broken language. Different culture doesn't help either.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Why do some of you keep talking about speaking English as a selling point? It's inherently false.boxing_rocks wrote:
Kovalev doesn't draw because of his poor English. What is Ward's excuse? Ah, those moron fans don't understand his style
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7465
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
Oh man that Bellator card is so bad. I just do not dig "legend" fights. They're really just sad old man fights with better branding. Davis/Bader and Larkin/Lima are good quality fights but no way I'm paying $50 for that.SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Yeah, undercards have always contributed minimally. That's probably why they've gotten progressively worse through the years. I'm not buying this one because I'm buying Bellator. Putting on 3 title fights and two legend bouts deserves my $50 and I'm not dealing with the ridiculous bills I used to with a Boxing, UFC and Pride every month!
Come to think of it, I usually buy more UFC than boxing events, but the only PPV I've bought so far this year is Golovkin/Jacobs.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1634
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
I will be buying this fight , but I don't buy PPV that much for years now. I used to buy PPV a lot. I think my last PPV purchases where Canelo vs Mayweather (boring as hell can I get my money back) and Ward Vs Kovalev I.
I don't regret paying for the first Ward vs Kovalev fight as that was very high level boxing, not a master piece but very interesting fight that I have now watched all the way through 2 other times on replay, and bits and pieces here and there.
I will buy the PPV for Kovalev vs Ward II and I like the under card for this one.
I don't regret paying for the first Ward vs Kovalev fight as that was very high level boxing, not a master piece but very interesting fight that I have now watched all the way through 2 other times on replay, and bits and pieces here and there.
I will buy the PPV for Kovalev vs Ward II and I like the under card for this one.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
The UFC hasn't gotten my money either, but I'm likely to buy both next month. I love Sonnen and Wandy is a God to me. Plus, they're trying and I like that. Bader/Davis was a shitty fight but that's a great lead in. As far as Bellator cards go, it can't get much better.jujigatame wrote:Oh man that Bellator card is so bad. I just do not dig "legend" fights. They're really just sad old man fights with better branding. Davis/Bader and Larkin/Lima are good quality fights but no way I'm paying $50 for that.SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Yeah, undercards have always contributed minimally. That's probably why they've gotten progressively worse through the years. I'm not buying this one because I'm buying Bellator. Putting on 3 title fights and two legend bouts deserves my $50 and I'm not dealing with the ridiculous bills I used to with a Boxing, UFC and Pride every month!
Come to think of it, I usually buy more UFC than boxing events, but the only PPV I've bought so far this year is Golovkin/Jacobs.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Ward/Kovalev II being a PPV is a bad sign
I have watched half a dozen recent interviews and he always has a translator standing behind him.victor-romeo wrote:Kovalev English way better than GGG, Actually Kovalev speaks English fine. Different culture now thats something different.boxing_rocks wrote:No, it is not. Kovalev and Golovkin are not connecting to most of casual fans because of their broken language. Different culture doesn't help either.SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Why do some of you keep talking about speaking English as a selling point? It's inherently false.
He might be OK during brief post-fight interviews when being asked simple questions, but for anything more linguistically challenging, then he always requires the assistance of a translator.
Sergey Kovalev’s frequent bigoted and controversial actions, coupled with his inability and lack of personality (probably due to language issues) is partly the reason why he isn’t as popular as he should be.
If Sergey had made more of an effort to learn the social etiquette/tolerance of the western world and also attaining a better standard of the English language (to help convey his personality), then his fan-base would be far bigger and his PPV/audience figures would probably be double the size of his current numbers.
Sergey Kovalev is one of the sports’ most exciting fighters, but his out-of-ring actions are likely to discourage many fight fans from supporting him.