Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL???

Poll ended at 13 Mar 2020, 02:40

Below the belt line (illegal)
53
77%
Above the belt line (legal)
16
23%
 
Total votes: 69

BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The second one was ridiculously low. That being said, kovalev was wilting before that. Fight sucked too much for me to complain with any passion.
To me, "ridiculously low" is a balls shot, which is between the gap in the legs.
I don't want to get hit right above the pubic hairline (where I think the low blows landed),
but they were definitely not the straight ball shots like Judah/Mayweather or Golata/Bowe.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

It wasn't even CLOSE to these ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieveAG-ui3g
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The second one was ridiculously low. That being said, kovalev was wilting before that. Fight sucked too much for me to complain with any passion.
To me, "ridiculously low" is a balls shot, which is between the gap in the legs.
I don't want to get hit right above the pubic hairline (where I think the low blows landed),
but they were definitely not the straight ball shots like Judah/Mayweather or Golata/Bowe.
:lol:
marvelous marv
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1184
Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 12:41

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by marvelous marv »

Even if Kovalev felt there was an illegal punch a fighter should never lay on the ropes in a defenseless position. The fight was stopped because Kovalev disobeyed prefight instructions.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by gilgamesh »

marvelous marv wrote:Even if Kovalev felt there was an illegal punch a fighter should never lay on the ropes in a defenseless position. The fight was stopped because Kovalev disobeyed prefight instructions.
:TU: Protect YOURSELF at all times. Don't count on the referee to protect you.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by asdfjkl »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
armageto wrote:AGAIN, Weeks established what was a legal punch BEFORE the fight in due to Kovalev's trunks being high. So THAT made the belt line legal. SO the two punches you were complaining about at 30:27 ARE legal. That last punch WAS low. Low blows didn't bring Kovalev to that point.
Exactly how I see it.

The ones that Ward landed at the end were a little low (none to the balls).
However, Kovalev was already done before that.

I am extremely impressed with Ward and Kovalev. I still think they are #1 and #2,
because of the gap between Kovalev and the rest of 175.
But, Ward is the better fighter of the two. Big deal.
But again, the shots were below the navel right?
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by punchoutsb »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The second one was ridiculously low. That being said, kovalev was wilting before that. Fight sucked too much for me to complain with any passion.
To me, "ridiculously low" is a balls shot, which is between the gap in the legs.
I don't want to get hit right above the pubic hairline (where I think the low blows landed),
but they were definitely not the straight ball shots like Judah/Mayweather or Golata/Bowe.
A low blow is a low blow and a low blow is illegal. It seems you want to volunteer to check the boxers balls to see if the actual testicles were hit but I'm afraid it doesn't (or at least shouldn't) work that way. It doesn't matter if a punch his balls, dick or thigh NO punch is permitted below the belt line.
armageto
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5259
Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by armageto »

asdfjkl wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
armageto wrote:AGAIN, Weeks established what was a legal punch BEFORE the fight in due to Kovalev's trunks being high. So THAT made the belt line legal. SO the two punches you were complaining about at 30:27 ARE legal. That last punch WAS low. Low blows didn't bring Kovalev to that point.
Exactly how I see it.

The ones that Ward landed at the end were a little low (none to the balls).
However, Kovalev was already done before that.

I am extremely impressed with Ward and Kovalev. I still think they are #1 and #2,
because of the gap between Kovalev and the rest of 175.
But, Ward is the better fighter of the two. Big deal.
But again, the shots were below the navel right?
Are you slow? The punch zone was deemed legal by Weeks due to where Kovalev's trunks were. Yes, that last punch was low. These belt shots/borderline punches you are complaining about (reference 30:27) were legal punches.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

armageto wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote: Exactly how I see it.

The ones that Ward landed at the end were a little low (none to the balls).
However, Kovalev was already done before that.

I am extremely impressed with Ward and Kovalev. I still think they are #1 and #2,
because of the gap between Kovalev and the rest of 175.
But, Ward is the better fighter of the two. Big deal.
But again, the shots were below the navel right?
Are you slow? The punch zone was deemed legal by Weeks due to where Kovalev's trunks were. Yes, that last punch was low. These belt shots/borderline punches you are complaining about (reference 30:27) were legal punches.
He's incredibly slow, a real brick wall. Not a troll, just really dumb.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by man »

NateJR wrote:Most were right on the beltline, I seen 2 shots that were clearly low, but nothing excessive enough that called for a DQ or even a point deduction.
i think he was warned, so the last
shot of the fight, which was clearly
low, should have meant a point
deduction, yet it was ruled as the
knockout punch instead.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by Kalan »

NateJR wrote: I seen 2 shots that were clearly low, but nothing excessive enough that called for a DQ or even a point deduction
You're insane. When you've been warned and continue to throw lower than ever??? ... The fight is stopped... You're point deducted... Kovalev gets 5 minutes.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

So you're no longer following boxing but you're still all over boxing on Twitter?
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by Freedom2013 »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:So you're no longer following boxing but you're still all over boxing on Twitter?
Why does it matter so much to you? Who are you, anyway?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by gilgamesh »

Freedom...do you ever have anything postive to say about Boxing? Maybe I'm wrong but it seems as if I only ever see you on here bitching about black fighters and stuff...do you ever have anything positive to say about the sport or the athletes that compete in it?
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by Freedom2013 »

Image
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46243
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by gilgamesh »

So...no then?
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by Freedom2013 »

gilgamesh wrote:Freedom...do you ever have anything postive to say about Boxing? Maybe I'm wrong but it seems as if I only ever see you on here bitching about black fighters and stuff...do you ever have anything positive to say about the sport or the athletes that compete in it?
I have posted a lot of positive comments. You need to look a bit harder. Search for my posts about Bivol, Gvozdyk, Barrera, Joshua, Klitschko, etc.

But when it comes to Ward-Kovalev I and II, it's impossible for me to ignore the injustice.
RScarf1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1418
Joined: 18 Aug 2005, 22:31

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by RScarf1 »

The video is proof that the referee is incompetent or intentionally incompetent.
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by Freedom2013 »

RScarf1 wrote:The video is proof that the referee is incompetent or intentionally incompetent.
Likely the latter.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Freedom2013 wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:So you're no longer following boxing but you're still all over boxing on Twitter?
Why does it matter so much to you? Who are you, anyway?
I couldn't care less, youre the one that made the drama filled announcement we all knew was bullshit. I'm mark, Tunney, and I don't like racist scum like you.
tonymaccaroni
Super Lightweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 07 May 2017, 02:43

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by tonymaccaroni »

del
Last edited by tonymaccaroni on 18 Jun 2017, 22:31, edited 2 times in total.
tonymaccaroni
Super Lightweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 07 May 2017, 02:43

Re: Were Ward's controversial blows LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

Post by tonymaccaroni »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:When someone is bent at an almost 90 degree angle, it's almost impossible to not punch a little low from certain angles.
So can a guy who is hurt to the body do that to limit any body punches?
No, you just get hit a little low for bending like that.
Kovalev was yielding to pressure at the time of the stoppage.

Stop making excuses.
Dude was gassing from the 3rd.
Max and Roy were calling it (which ended up being the truth),
while many of you were chasing Lederman's fantasy card.
Thank you exactly what I thought, where the eff was Ward supposed to land when Kova is bent over like that lol. At this point it doesn't even matter anyway because Kova was finished. How many nasty punches do you see someone get hit in the head with on the way down to a KO, its boxing, it happens. Defend yourself at all times, thats all.

You people clinging on to this are just deluded and biased. That shot you keep linking video to is irrelevant and only shows what bad sports you are.

I will show the actual punch that matters again just so the delusional s cannot ignore it

Image

That was the punch that started it all. How is that so low that a world champion professional boxer couldn't take it and keep on fighting.

HE couldn't take it cause he hurt and gassed from a combination of being hit and also hitting a lot of thin air.

Excellent point BAD INTENTIONS someone who knows what they are talking about.
Locked