Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Post by Ricky_ »

gilgamesh wrote:No Contest was the right call. The situation you refer to wasn't a flagrant enough foul that it should've resulted in a TKO loss.

The Hopkins "shoulder injury" is the fakest thing i've ever seen, only Dirrell comes close.
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Post by GlobalBox »

handsofstone wrote:Was it confirmed that this was changed to a NC?
Not yet got to have an official meeting apparently but it's leaked that it almost certainly will be changed, don't have a choice really.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46245
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Post by gilgamesh »

Ricky_ wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:No Contest was the right call. The situation you refer to wasn't a flagrant enough foul that it should've resulted in a TKO loss.

The Hopkins "shoulder injury" is the fakest thing i've ever seen, only Dirrell comes close.
There an X-Ray showing Hopkins' shoulder injury was legit. Dirrell never presented anything of the sort.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Post by Ricky_ »

gilgamesh wrote:
Ricky_ wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:No Contest was the right call. The situation you refer to wasn't a flagrant enough foul that it should've resulted in a TKO loss.

The Hopkins "shoulder injury" is the fakest thing i've ever seen, only Dirrell comes close.
There an X-Ray showing Hopkins' shoulder injury was legit. Dirrell never presented anything of the sort.

He never produced an xray, he had some phoney doctor report. You could tell just by looking at it that it was fine, then when he uses that arm to prop himself up, that;s all the evidence you need. Guy's a fraud.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46245
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Post by gilgamesh »

Ricky_ wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Ricky_ wrote:

The Hopkins "shoulder injury" is the fakest thing i've ever seen, only Dirrell comes close.
There an X-Ray showing Hopkins' shoulder injury was legit. Dirrell never presented anything of the sort.

He never produced an xray, he had some phoney doctor report. You could tell just by looking at it that it was fine, then when he uses that arm to prop himself up, that;s all the evidence you need. Guy's a fraud.
He fought Dawson in an immediate rematch and lost. What's the big deal? He got the loss he was inevitably going to get anyway...so what's it matter? It's not like he escaped his loss he merely postponed it :lol:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

He did escape a loss, really bizarre that you think it's ok for a fighter to get screwed as long as they get a rematch. I know you agreed with the bullshit decision and I get that rationale. This whole, who cares because they fought again attitude is ass.
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Post by watsupdoc87 »

Take a point of. Lad could of kept fighting and get the beating of a lifetime but pretended like a bitch he couldn't hoping to win dq. fornicate him and dirrels :bag:
Post Reply