Brian Mitchell

Post Reply
nobleart1978
Super Welterweight
Posts: 722
Joined: 25 Jun 2015, 16:18

Brian Mitchell

Post by nobleart1978 »

How would the WBA Super Featherweight champ from 1986 - 91 faired if he had fought:

Julio Cesar Chavez and Azumah Nelson in unification fights at 130lbs.
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Brian Mitchell

Post by littlepug »

Hard to say, he was a good allrounder but did nothing spectacularly, a bit of a poor mans McCallum type, I would think he loses to both but its not a formality
paddy chavez
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2678
Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08

Re: Brian Mitchell

Post by paddy chavez »

littlepug wrote:Hard to say, he was a good allrounder but did nothing spectacularly, a bit of a poor mans McCallum type, I would think he loses to both but its not a formality
Yeah I agree Mitchell had so many defences largely because he was south African and there was a boycott against south African sports men having said that he was a good solid champion just not on Chavez's level
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Brian Mitchell

Post by Counter-puncher »

Anything less than Good Zumah (not lazy disinterested Zumah) would get outpointed by Mitchell IMO.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Brian Mitchell

Post by Autobarn »

Superb technician, with remarkable fitness; do not count him out against anyone.

Chavez always seemed weight drained at 130 and not firing on all cylinders, pretty sparing in his output and eager pace himself (see the outstanding and fiercely competed bots with Lockridge and Laporte)
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Re: Brian Mitchell

Post by Bodyshot3 »

Intriguing fights for Brian.....he was a very hard, skilled fighter who deserves a great deal of kudos for winning so often on the road.
He actually beat Lopez twice (despite the dodgy draw) right in Tony's backyard and that took some doing.

Need to revisit the fights, but I actually thought he did a slightly better job dealing with Jim McDonnell (who was very handy) than Nelson.
Azumah stopped Jim and had him down as well, but Mitchell arguably took less shots and controlled his fight better.

What might count against Brian when faced by Chavez and Nelson is that at the highest level he did not have spiteful, one punch power. He ground blokes down, round by round and maybe Nelson and Chavez would chance their arm and not feel too bothered about getting tagged and hurt?

But then again Mitchell had 49 pro fights and was never stopped, so could they have bombed him out?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Brian Mitchell

Post by Counter-puncher »

No way Mitchell gets stopped. No way. Way too clever, way too good a mover if he chose to, way too tough.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Brian Mitchell

Post by Bricks »

:TU:
Bodyshot3 wrote:Intriguing fights for Brian.....he was a very hard, skilled fighter who deserves a great deal of kudos for winning so often on the road.
He actually beat Lopez twice (despite the dodgy draw) right in Tony's backyard and that took some doing.

Need to revisit the fights, but I actually thought he did a slightly better job dealing with Jim McDonnell (who was very handy) than Nelson.
Azumah stopped Jim and had him down as well, but Mitchell arguably took less shots and controlled his fight better.

What might count against Brian when faced by Chavez and Nelson is that at the highest level he did not have spiteful, one punch power. He ground blokes down, round by round and maybe Nelson and Chavez would chance their arm and not feel too bothered about getting tagged and hurt?

But then again Mitchell had 49 pro fights and was never stopped, so could they have bombed him out?
Superb post
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Brian Mitchell

Post by Tomasino »

Bodyshot3 wrote:Intriguing fights for Brian.....he was a very hard, skilled fighter who deserves a great deal of kudos for winning so often on the road.
He actually beat Lopez twice (despite the dodgy draw) right in Tony's backyard and that took some doing.

Need to revisit the fights, but I actually thought he did a slightly better job dealing with Jim McDonnell (who was very handy) than Nelson.
Azumah stopped Jim and had him down as well, but Mitchell arguably took less shots and controlled his fight better.

What might count against Brian when faced by Chavez and Nelson is that at the highest level he did not have spiteful, one punch power. He ground blokes down, round by round and maybe Nelson and Chavez would chance their arm and not feel too bothered about getting tagged and hurt?

But then again Mitchell had 49 pro fights and was never stopped, so could they have bombed him out?

This says it better than I could. Mitchell's one of my favourites.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7190
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Brian Mitchell

Post by Nile4000 »

Autobarn wrote:Superb technician, with remarkable fitness; do not count him out against anyone.

Chavez always seemed weight drained at 130 and not firing on all cylinders, pretty sparing in his output and eager pace himself (see the outstanding and fiercely competed bots with Lockridge and Laporte)
Camacho, Roger Mayweather, and Arguello handles him.
Post Reply