Wilder rejects Whyte

ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by ValMar »

candyslim wrote:I knew that ValMar.Sometimes I like to deliberately misunderstand for the sake of making a joke. I'm sixty now and I think my wife has given up waiting for me to grow up :oops:
I am always (or almost always) anxious writing on this forum, beacuse of my broken English, I am frightened that I would be misunderstood.
I would express myself much better on my native language, of course. So, please, do not be too strict, I am just a Balkaneros who has been lazy learning foreign languages during the childhood.
I was born 1965 ( Lennox Lewis, too), and, really, I have thought that I was the oldest (or almost oldest) here, on forum....And, I was wrong, again. You are lucky, you have to remember Kim Wilde when she was about twenty five....I hope that your wife does not read these posts..........
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by candyslim »

ValMar you do yourself an injustice regarding your English. I'll bet it has improved dramatically since you have been using this forum. Even my understanding has improved and I am English. Sometimes I can even understand Tanzio !

Kim Wilde eh? Yes I can see where you're coming from. When I was a boy there was a tv show called "The Avengers" where a beautiful young actress called Diana Rigg played a character called Emma Peel who would wear a skin-tight leather cat-suit. In theory I was too young to be interested but oh boy, was I interested. She recently appeared on "Game of thrones" but you'll need Google to understand why I was so impressed :OhYes:
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by ValMar »

candyslim wrote:ValMar you do yourself an injustice regarding your English. I'll bet it has improved dramatically since you have been using this forum. Even my understanding has improved and I am English. Sometimes I can even understand Tanzio !

Kim Wilde eh? Yes I can see where you're coming from. When I was a boy there was a tv show called "The Avengers" where a beautiful young actress called Diana Rigg played a character called Emma Peel who would wear a skin-tight leather cat-suit. In theory I was too young to be interested but oh boy, was I interested. She recently appeared on "Game of thrones" but you'll need Google to understand why I was so impressed :OhYes:
OMG, I saw her pics a few minutes ago, and I am not sure that I will sleep properly tonight ?

BTW, is Tanzio a Brit ?

I learned that you are Brit, and Best Coast and Saad are Americans, and that's it.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by Counter-puncher »

Your English is fine, ValMar :TU:
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by ValMar »

Counter-puncher wrote:Your English is fine, ValMar :TU:
I don't think so, but, thank you.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by candyslim »

Tanzio is American ValMar and when he says stuff like, let me see what was it now, forgive me if I get this wrong ... "The butt-hurt in here, is as thick as the gas at an indoor chilli and cherry-pie cook off"

I was a little bemused - I dread to think what you made of it. We are both getting an education on here :D

Glad you liked Mrs. Peel.

Signing off now. Night folks.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by ValMar »

candyslim wrote:Tanzio is American ValMar and when he says stuff like, let me see what was it now, forgive me if I get this wrong ... "The butt-hurt in here, is as thick as the gas at an indoor chilli and cherry-pie cook off"

I was a little bemused - I dread to think what you made of it. We are both getting an education on here :D

Glad you liked Mrs. Peel.

Signing off now. Night folks.
Tanzio's narrative mode is a little bit strange, at least. It is something like a "stream of conciousness", but this is a forum, and we need different persons with their own opinions and writting style, of course.
So, I can not always understand (I mean literally) him, but, without him this forum would not be so interesting place -----something like HW division without Fury and Wilder.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by candyslim »

This is true. He has given me some good laughs as well as contributing some interesting posts.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

candyslim wrote:This is true. He has given me some good laughs as well as contributing some interesting posts.
Nobody is funnier than you, how about producing your claims?
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by candyslim »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
candyslim wrote:This is true. He has given me some good laughs as well as contributing some interesting posts.
Nobody is funnier than you, how about producing your claims?
What does that mean? If you mean I should produce evidence to back up what I say you'll need to make it clear what claims you're referring to.

Obviously you can't be referring to the subject I've been discussing most in the last couple of days, the Povetkin drug test, I don't need to back up my claim because the WBC have retracted their claim that Povetkin ingested Meldonium after it became a banned substance, in other words they had no reason to prevent the fight going ahead.

You know this Saad, why are we even discussing it?

Or did you save this as a draft a while ago and then decided you'd post it anyway even though the discussion had moved forward since then?
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

The wbc has done no such thing.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by Badhusker »

10 pages on a Wilder rejects Whyte thread? :doh: :zzz:
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by asdfjkl »

Badhusker wrote:10 pages on a Wilder rejects Whyte thread? :doh: :zzz:
It's interesting to see what he's going to do now isn't it? Ortiz is availeble and would be awesome to see, just like Whyte fight, but he seems to be waiting, doing absolutely nothing right now? Not getting rid of Stiverne, not showing any sign of trying to be active at all, does the weed have anything to deal with it? All the top contenders are busy, except Ortiz, but Wilder doesn't seem to like to face him I guess. Is Wilder just waiting till the moment unification seems to be possible again and just before that moment when it might be possible again schedule his fight with Stiverne or something?
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26531
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by KiwiRider »

asdfjkl wrote:
Badhusker wrote:10 pages on a Wilder rejects Whyte thread? :doh: :zzz:
It's interesting to see what he's going to do now isn't it? Ortiz is availeble and would be awesome to see, just like Whyte fight, but he seems to be waiting, doing absolutely nothing right now? Not getting rid of Stiverne, not showing any sign of trying to be active at all, does the weed have anything to deal with it? All the top contenders are busy, except Ortiz, but Wilder doesn't seem to like to face him I guess. Is Wilder just waiting till the moment unification seems to be possible again and just before that moment when it might be possible again schedule his fight with Stiverne or something?
I think that is exactly what will happen.
All talk, and C grade action.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by candyslim »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The wbc has done no such thing.
See the other thread.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46482
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by gilgamesh »

candyslim wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The wbc has done no such thing.
See the other thread.
You've never provided what you claim in any thread. The WBC didn't retract anything about Povetkin.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by asdfjkl »

gilgamesh wrote:
candyslim wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The wbc has done no such thing.
See the other thread.
You've never provided what you claim in any thread. The WBC didn't retract anything about Povetkin.
It's a matter of time, the WBC is retarded, you know that, or should know that. They probably do it after Wilder had his mandatory fight against Stiverne, so he doesn't have to fight Povetkin for another 1,5 year. Also note that Wilder is currently probably wasting as much time as possible till Parker/Hughie are boxing, then Wilder probably scheduled his fight around januari ish so Povetkin will be 41 or so once Wilder has to face him and Wilder has a good excuse to avoid the winner of Hughie/Parker by facing his mandatory. In the end Povetkin will probably get restored by februari 2018 or so, if he doesn't win any other belts or mandatory spots meanwhile.
Last edited by asdfjkl on 02 Jul 2017, 04:50, edited 1 time in total.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46482
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by gilgamesh »

asdfjkl wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
candyslim wrote:
See the other thread.
You've never provided what you claim in any thread. The WBC didn't retract anything about Povetkin.
It's a matter of time, the WBC is retarded, you know that, or should know that. They probably do it after Wilder had his mandatory fight, so he doesn't have to fight Povetkin for another 1,5 year.
I thought it was already done? If it's a matter of time then you're both just full of sh*t.

Wilder is a complete p*ssy so I'm not taking up for that coward, but Povetkin screwed himself out of the fight with Wilder. He has only himself to blame, and all your whining is never gonna give him back the opportunity he pissed away when he pissed dirty.

A year from now, Povetkin probably won't be Top 10 anymore. Ever again.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

candyslim wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The wbc has done no such thing.
See the other thread.
:lol: :wave:
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by asdfjkl »

gilgamesh wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
You've never provided what you claim in any thread. The WBC didn't retract anything about Povetkin.
It's a matter of time, the WBC is retarded, you know that, or should know that. They probably do it after Wilder had his mandatory fight, so he doesn't have to fight Povetkin for another 1,5 year.
I thought it was already done? If it's a matter of time then you're both just full of sh*t.

Wilder is a complete p*ssy so I'm not taking up for that coward, but Povetkin screwed himself out of the fight with Wilder. He has only himself to blame, and all your whining is never gonna give him back the opportunity he pissed away when he pissed dirty.

A year from now, Povetkin probably won't be Top 10 anymore. Ever again.
No, Wada is to blame, Wada didn't have a clue what they were doing and Wilder knew that, that's why Wilder wanted them to be involved so badly.
Also note that Povetkin his samples have been tested in a currently suspended Wada lab.
https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/ ... substances

Also note that the Meldonium case is now even more in Povetkin his advantage:
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/ ... l-en_0.pdf
"Meldonium should not be reported at levels below 100 ng/mL; " (Povetkin had 70 nanogram)
And
"Meldonium 200 ng/mL" is still allowed

So in other words, the amount of Meldonium where from Wilder claimed it would make Povetkin an unnatural monster that might kill him with unhuman powers or whatever kind of similar words he used, is now suddenly allowed again by Wada.

In other words, if that same fight, with the same contract, was scheduled today, Wilder would have had 0 excuses to avoid the fight.
Last edited by asdfjkl on 02 Jul 2017, 04:58, edited 1 time in total.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46482
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by gilgamesh »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
candyslim wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The wbc has done no such thing.
See the other thread.
:lol: :wave:
It's funny that he reports bullsh*t and YOU'RE the asshole for calling him on it :lol:

Oh us Boxing fans and our troublesome facts :lol:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

asdfjkl wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: It's a matter of time, the WBC is retarded, you know that, or should know that. They probably do it after Wilder had his mandatory fight, so he doesn't have to fight Povetkin for another 1,5 year.
I thought it was already done? If it's a matter of time then you're both just full of sh*t.

Wilder is a complete p*ssy so I'm not taking up for that coward, but Povetkin screwed himself out of the fight with Wilder. He has only himself to blame, and all your whining is never gonna give him back the opportunity he pissed away when he pissed dirty.

A year from now, Povetkin probably won't be Top 10 anymore. Ever again.
No, Wada is to blame, Wada didn't have a clue what they were doing and Wilder knew that, that's why Wilder wanted them to be involved so badly.
Also note that Povetkin his samples have been tested in a currently suspended Wada lab.
https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/ ... substances

Also note that the Meldonium case is now even more in Povetkin his advantage:
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/ ... l-en_0.pdf
"Meldonium should not be reported at levels below 100 ng/mL; " (Povetkin had 70 nanogram)
And
"Meldonium 200 ng/mL" is still allowed

So in other words, the amount of Meldonium where from Wilder claimed it would make Povetkin an unnatural monster that might kill him with unhuman powers or whatever kind of similar words he used, is now suddenly allowed again by Wada.
You killed candyslim!!!! You dumb motherfucker.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46482
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by gilgamesh »

asdfjkl wrote: No, Wada is to blame, Wada didn't have a clue what they were doing and Wilder knew that, that's why Wilder wanted them to be involved so badly.
Also note that Povetkin his samples have been tested in a currently suspended Wada lab.
https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/ ... substances

Also note that the Meldonium case is now even more in Povetkin his advantage:
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/ ... l-en_0.pdf
"Meldonium should not be reported at levels below 100 ng/mL; " (Povetkin had 70 nanogram)
And
"Meldonium 200 ng/mL" is still allowed

So in other words, I'll stop at nothing to defend Povetkin to the end of time no matter how clear it is that he was on PED's and how clear it was that today without them he wasn't the same fighter.
We hear ya guy
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

gilgamesh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
candyslim wrote:
See the other thread.
:lol: :wave:
It's funny that he reports bullsh*t and YOU'RE the asshole for calling him on it :lol:

Oh us Boxing fans and our troublesome facts :lol:
Yeah, poor bastard runs his mouth and gets called on his bullshit and it's 'hate'. I tried to reason with him, dude wouldn't hear it. Kept quoting kalan and assforbrsinsjkgh. Oh well, good riddance.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder rejects Whyte

Post by asdfjkl »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
I thought it was already done? If it's a matter of time then you're both just full of sh*t.

Wilder is a complete p*ssy so I'm not taking up for that coward, but Povetkin screwed himself out of the fight with Wilder. He has only himself to blame, and all your whining is never gonna give him back the opportunity he pissed away when he pissed dirty.

A year from now, Povetkin probably won't be Top 10 anymore. Ever again.
No, Wada is to blame, Wada didn't have a clue what they were doing and Wilder knew that, that's why Wilder wanted them to be involved so badly.
Also note that Povetkin his samples have been tested in a currently suspended Wada lab.
https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/ ... substances

Also note that the Meldonium case is now even more in Povetkin his advantage:
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/ ... l-en_0.pdf
"Meldonium should not be reported at levels below 100 ng/mL; " (Povetkin had 70 nanogram)
And
"Meldonium 200 ng/mL" is still allowed

So in other words, the amount of Meldonium where from Wilder claimed it would make Povetkin an unnatural monster that might kill him with unhuman powers or whatever kind of similar words he used, is now suddenly allowed again by Wada.
You killed candyslim!!!! You dumb motherfucker.
I just show the facts, that's all, and your mum wasn't attractive enough for me anyway even when you wasn't born yet.
Post Reply