I did not know she was a mother, she looks so young, and hot, of course........Tanzio wrote:ValMar wrote:Very, very nice....I would not call her a milf, she is too young.....asdfjkl wrote: You're right, nice milfShe's a mother, Dutch oven brain would like to fvck her. What part of milf do you not understand?
Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.Mexi-Box wrote:I'm always right, and you're always wrong. It's nothing personal, just the cards you were dealt.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I gotta give credit where it's due. Mexi-bros is frequently wrong, but this was a great rbr. Well done man.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
You're wrong, SaadOffTheDeck is by far the one who got things wrong most often.Lackeos wrote:Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.Mexi-Box wrote:I'm always right, and you're always wrong. It's nothing personal, just the cards you were dealt.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I gotta give credit where it's due. Mexi-bros is frequently wrong, but this was a great rbr. Well done man.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
Unfortunately, I am too old.asdfjkl wrote:And she's 34, how long am I supposed to wait?
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
You just keep adding to your lead, Dutch oven brain.asdfjkl wrote:You're wrong, SaadOffTheDeck is by far the one who got things wrong most often.Lackeos wrote:Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.Mexi-Box wrote: I'm always right, and you're always wrong. It's nothing personal, just the cards you were dealt.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
I don't even know who the hell you are. Probably another poster I emasculated with my intellect.Lackeos wrote:Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.Mexi-Box wrote:I'm always right, and you're always wrong. It's nothing personal, just the cards you were dealt.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I gotta give credit where it's due. Mexi-bros is frequently wrong, but this was a great rbr. Well done man.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
Did you see her fight? She's not tearing off anything. She moves more than she fights.Tanzio wrote:She'd tear your weeble clean off your wobble.asdfjkl wrote:You're right, nice milfValMar wrote:Guys, don't argue, look at Svetlana. She is "like thunder".........
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
You haven't said an intelligent thing the entire time you've been a member here. If you had, I would've given you credit for it.Mexi-Box wrote:I don't even know who the hell you are. Probably another poster I emasculated with my intellect.Lackeos wrote:Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.Mexi-Box wrote: I'm always right, and you're always wrong. It's nothing personal, just the cards you were dealt.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
No, you wouldn't give me credit because everything I post here is intelligent. I haven't heard a peep from you thanking me for posting here, though.Lackeos wrote:You haven't said an intelligent thing the entire time you've been a member here. If you had, I would've given you credit for it.Mexi-Box wrote:I don't even know who the hell you are. Probably another poster I emasculated with my intellect.Lackeos wrote: Now hold on. Both of you are wrong most of the time. Especially you.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
Movement is what tears weebles off, Mexi- box of rocks. Especially with a vise-grip.Mexi-Box wrote:Did you see her fight? She's not tearing off anything. She moves more than she fights.Tanzio wrote:She'd tear your weeble clean off your wobble.asdfjkl wrote: You're right, nice milf
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
What is wrong with you?Tanzio wrote:Movement is what tears weebles off, Mexi- box of rocks. Especially with a vise-grip.Mexi-Box wrote:Did you see her fight? She's not tearing off anything. She moves more than she fights.Tanzio wrote: She'd tear your weeble clean off your wobble.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
You should know what the discussion is about prior to sticking your box of rocks in the middle of it.Mexi-Box wrote:What is wrong with you?Tanzio wrote:Movement is what tears weebles off, Mexi- box of rocks. Especially with a vise-grip.Mexi-Box wrote: Did you see her fight? She's not tearing off anything. She moves more than she fights.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
Do you know how much I hate you?Tanzio wrote:You should know what the discussion is about prior to sticking your box of rocks in the middle of it.Mexi-Box wrote:What is wrong with you?Tanzio wrote: Movement is what tears weebles off, Mexi- box of rocks. Especially with a vise-grip.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
You should strive for actually deserving to be thanked for the quality of your posts, rather than delusively convincing yourself that you deserve to be thanked.Mexi-Box wrote:No, you wouldn't give me credit because everything I post here is intelligent. I haven't heard a peep from you thanking me for posting here, though.Lackeos wrote:You haven't said an intelligent thing the entire time you've been a member here. If you had, I would've given you credit for it.Mexi-Box wrote: I don't even know who the hell you are. Probably another poster I emasculated with my intellect.
Try this: remove bias from the positions you take (you are extraordinarily biased towards eastern European fighters, if you haven't noticed), base your opinions on facts (you can often only back-up your grandiose evaluations of your favorite fighters with only your own eye test), you have a serious problem with narcissism that you need to address, stop being flat-out wrong about so many things, and attempt to discuss the topic of boxing more with fewer personal attacks.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
How about I try none of that and just keep posting my intelligent posts.Lackeos wrote:You should strive for actually deserving to be thanked for the quality of your posts, rather than delusively convincing yourself that you deserve to be thanked.Mexi-Box wrote:No, you wouldn't give me credit because everything I post here is intelligent. I haven't heard a peep from you thanking me for posting here, though.Lackeos wrote: You haven't said an intelligent thing the entire time you've been a member here. If you had, I would've given you credit for it.
Try this: remove bias from the positions you take (you are extraordinarily biased towards eastern European fighters, if you haven't noticed), base your opinions on facts (you can often only back-up your grandiose evaluations of your favorite fighters with only your own eye test), you have a serious problem with narcissism that you need to address, stop being flat-out wrong about so many things, and attempt to discuss the topic of boxing more with fewer personal attacks.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
So basically what you're saying is that, going forward, you will definitely continue to be biased, narcissistic, flat-out wrong, and fail to base your opinions on facts. I guess we agree on something.Mexi-Box wrote:How about I try none of that and just keep posting my intelligent posts.Lackeos wrote:You should strive for actually deserving to be thanked for the quality of your posts, rather than delusively convincing yourself that you deserve to be thanked.Mexi-Box wrote: No, you wouldn't give me credit because everything I post here is intelligent. I haven't heard a peep from you thanking me for posting here, though.
Try this: remove bias from the positions you take (you are extraordinarily biased towards eastern European fighters, if you haven't noticed), base your opinions on facts (you can often only back-up your grandiose evaluations of your favorite fighters with only your own eye test), you have a serious problem with narcissism that you need to address, stop being flat-out wrong about so many things, and attempt to discuss the topic of boxing more with fewer personal attacks.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
No, I'm saying that your opinion is so blatantly wrong and misleading that I have to discount everything you said and just keep posting. I guess critical thinking isn't a strong point for you, though.Lackeos wrote:So basically what you're saying is that, going forward, you will definitely continue to be biased, narcissistic, flat-out wrong, and fail to base your opinions on facts. I guess we agree on something.Mexi-Box wrote:How about I try none of that and just keep posting my intelligent posts.Lackeos wrote: You should strive for actually deserving to be thanked for the quality of your posts, rather than delusively convincing yourself that you deserve to be thanked.
Try this: remove bias from the positions you take (you are extraordinarily biased towards eastern European fighters, if you haven't noticed), base your opinions on facts (you can often only back-up your grandiose evaluations of your favorite fighters with only your own eye test), you have a serious problem with narcissism that you need to address, stop being flat-out wrong about so many things, and attempt to discuss the topic of boxing more with fewer personal attacks.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
Wow, you are easily stirred to passion. Just in case, if you are actually a male, I am heterosexual. There will be no make-up sex in this relationship.Mexi-Box wrote:Do you know how much I hate you?Tanzio wrote:You should know what the discussion is about prior to sticking your box of rocks in the middle of it.Mexi-Box wrote: What is wrong with you?
If you were to go back and actually bother to read what you so quickly agreed with I am confident that you would come to the understanding that you do not in fact agree with the words as structured, Mexi-box of rocks.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
It was tongue in cheek, though. No, I don't hate you, and I was laughing to myself when I wrote it.Tanzio wrote:Wow, you are easily stirred to passion. Just in case, if you are actually a male, I am heterosexual. There will be no make-up sex in this relationship.Mexi-Box wrote:Do you know how much I hate you?Tanzio wrote: You should know what the discussion is about prior to sticking your box of rocks in the middle of it.![]()
If you were to go back and actually bother to read what you so quickly agreed with I am confident that you would come to the understanding that you do not in fact agree with the words as structured, Mexi-box of rocks.
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
Mexi-Box wrote:It was tongue in cheek, though. No, I don't hate you, and I was laughing to myself when I wrote it.Tanzio wrote:Wow, you are easily stirred to passion. Just in case, if you are actually a male, I am heterosexual. There will be no make-up sex in this relationship.Mexi-Box wrote: Do you know how much I hate you?![]()
If you were to go back and actually bother to read what you so quickly agreed with I am confident that you would come to the understanding that you do not in fact agree with the words as structured, Mexi-box of rocks.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Povetkin vs. Rudenko RBR
Russia has the cutest ring girls!