Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
Sniffing glue and boffing petrol isn't recommended.
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
no chance while Josh Taylor fight for commwealth title. Davies is ranked by the WBC and could fight world level guys know. He just bypassed the Taylor level.Stuarty30 wrote:He's not even the best in Britain. Josh Taylor will slap him around
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
Different stages in their careers. I'd still take Taylor over Davies. He's a better all round fighter so there's every chance man.world ranked wrote:no chance while Josh Taylor fight for commwealth title. Davies is ranked by the WBC and could fight world level guys know. He just bypassed the Taylor level.Stuarty30 wrote:He's not even the best in Britain. Josh Taylor will slap him around
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
If there the same level as fighters as you suggest why isn't Josh Taylor at least at euro/brittish level. Hearn did say he wants Taylor for Davies so if Taylors team fancy it. Probably can happen.Stuarty30 wrote:Different stages in their careers. I'd still take Taylor over Davies. He's a better all round fighter so there's every chance man.world ranked wrote:no chance while Josh Taylor fight for commwealth title. Davies is ranked by the WBC and could fight world level guys know. He just bypassed the Taylor level.Stuarty30 wrote:He's not even the best in Britain. Josh Taylor will slap him around
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
Taylor said he'll take the fight in a heartbeat as has his promoter McGuigan. I didn't say they were the same level I said Taylor is the better fighter.world ranked wrote:If there the same level as fighters as you suggest why isn't Josh Taylor at least at euro/brittish level. Hearn did say he wants Taylor for Davies so if Taylors team fancy it. Probably can happen.Stuarty30 wrote:Different stages in their careers. I'd still take Taylor over Davies. He's a better all round fighter so there's every chance man.world ranked wrote:
no chance while Josh Taylor fight for commwealth title. Davies is ranked by the WBC and could fight world level guys know. He just bypassed the Taylor level.
PS what Eddie Hearn says and what Eddie Hearn does are two very different things.
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
Yes. Much better. His performance to KO the shop worn Derry Mathews (at 140) far eclipses anything Crawford has done to date. Like beat Gamboa Burns Postol Molina Beltran. ahem
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
Jip wrote:Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
is it just me or does he seem more athletic, with equal reach and closly as much power as crawford
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32754
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
This thread deserved a bump, shocking how little some people know 
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
wowJip wrote:is it just me or does he seem more athletic, with equal reach and closly as much power as crawford
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
I'm not for being smarmy after someone gets a pick wrong but this is pretty spectacularly wrong. Especially seeing as Jip once told me he was an expert and I was clueless.Boxerbeetle wrote:This thread deserved a bump, shocking how little some people know
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9011
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
That's the problem with forums like this; some people think their opinions are facts.Covfefe wrote:I'm not for being smarmy after someone gets a pick wrong but this is pretty spectacularly wrong. Especially seeing as Jip once told me he was an expert and I was clueless.Boxerbeetle wrote:This thread deserved a bump, shocking how little some people know
Sometimes, even self appointed 'experts' can get things spectacularly wrong.
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
That's why boxing is great. If everything happened as I think it will it would be tiresome. I didn't offer a pick last night as I hadn't seen Taylor much and thought Davies was decent enough but there was clearly faults there. Sometimes it's fun to just watch. Comparing him to Crawford is pretty bad though.Syntax Error wrote:That's the problem with forums like this; some people think their opinions are facts.Covfefe wrote:I'm not for being smarmy after someone gets a pick wrong but this is pretty spectacularly wrong. Especially seeing as Jip once told me he was an expert and I was clueless.Boxerbeetle wrote:This thread deserved a bump, shocking how little some people know
Sometimes, even self appointed 'experts' can get things spectacularly wrong.
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
Davies looked a bit lost last night
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
world ranked wrote:no chance while Josh Taylor fight for commwealth title. Davies is ranked by the WBC and could fight world level guys know. He just bypassed the Taylor level.Stuarty30 wrote:He's not even the best in Britain. Josh Taylor will slap him around
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
I dont like to throw it in people's faces, and Im wrong plenty myself, but I really have no idea how people couldve watched Davies and think he was world class and/or on a different level to Taylor. He's got loads of technical flaws (e.g very wide punches from too far out), his footwork is plodding, he's a bit short for 140, and he isnt particulary fast handed or big punching.
To me he's a poor man's Broner, and I found it striking how he was being talked about on the world scene even though he'd never fought beyond English level prior to Scarpa and shopworn Matthews. I think he partially gobbed himself into that...
Let's see how he comes back from being outclassed, beaten up, and stopped. Even he admitted that it was an embarrassing loss,
To me he's a poor man's Broner, and I found it striking how he was being talked about on the world scene even though he'd never fought beyond English level prior to Scarpa and shopworn Matthews. I think he partially gobbed himself into that...
Let's see how he comes back from being outclassed, beaten up, and stopped. Even he admitted that it was an embarrassing loss,
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
Did he? What else did he say, did he say why he was gesturing to his eye. Or was he just wanting a way out?crusader wrote:I dont like to throw it in people's faces, and Im wrong plenty myself, but I really have no idea how people couldve watched Davies and think he was world class and/or on a different level to Taylor. He's got loads of technical flaws (e.g very wide punches from too far out), his footwork is plodding, he's a bit short for 140, and he isnt particulary fast handed or big punching.
To me he's a poor man's Broner, and I found it striking how he was being talked about on the world scene even though he'd never fought beyond English level prior to Scarpa and shopworn Matthews. I think he partially gobbed himself into that...
Let's see how he comes back from being outclassed, beaten up, and stopped. Even he admitted that it was an embarrassing loss,
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
Fair play to Taylor he made me look silly. I was clearly wrong here.Naandrew wrote:
world ranked wrote:no chance while Josh Taylor fight for commwealth title. Davies is ranked by the WBC and could fight world level guys know. He just bypassed the Taylor level.Stuarty30 wrote:He's not even the best in Britain. Josh Taylor will slap him around
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32754
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
Nothing wrong with being wrong mate, as long as you didn't go so far as to say Davis was better than Terence Crawfordworld ranked wrote:Fair play to Taylor he made me look silly. I was clearly wrong here.Naandrew wrote:
world ranked wrote:
no chance while Josh Taylor fight for commwealth title. Davies is ranked by the WBC and could fight world level guys know. He just bypassed the Taylor level.
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
Styles make fights. Had floyd brawl with canelo or maidana he wouldve get tko'd.
Had ohara fight from outside, quick in and out, than he surly wouldve won. Instead he decided to fight close up with a guy who has a good hook and who likes to fight close range and thats what happened.
Had ohara fight from outside, quick in and out, than he surly wouldve won. Instead he decided to fight close up with a guy who has a good hook and who likes to fight close range and thats what happened.
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
Are you now saying that Davis is on FMJ's level, just tactically flawed?Jip wrote:Styles make fights. Had floyd brawl with canelo or maidana he wouldve get tko'd.
Had ohara fight from outside, quick in and out, than he surly wouldve won. Instead he decided to fight close up with a guy who has a good hook and who likes to fight close range and thats what happened.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
So you were right, he just fought wrong? Surely would have won? He got his ass whipped.Jip wrote:Styles make fights. Had floyd brawl with canelo or maidana he wouldve get tko'd.
Had ohara fight from outside, quick in and out, than he surly wouldve won. Instead he decided to fight close up with a guy who has a good hook and who likes to fight close range and thats what happened.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
handsofstone wrote:Yes of course its obvious
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
The sight of jip tripping over his own clown-shoes isn't going away any time soon
-
HyacinthusTurnipseed
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: 11 Dec 2010, 16:34
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
You make a rod for your own back with all the "I'm an expert" garbage but at least you stick around and face up to the gloating when you get one (embarrassingly) wrong. It's a decently admirable quality.Jip wrote:Styles make fights. Had floyd brawl with canelo or maidana he wouldve get tko'd.
Had ohara fight from outside, quick in and out, than he surly wouldve won. Instead he decided to fight close up with a guy who has a good hook and who likes to fight close range and thats what happened.
As for the fight, Davies doesn't have the footspeed nor balance to perform the game plan you've laid out. He tried boxing at long range but after the first round he was getting picked apart. He had to try to slug it out because it was the only way he had any kind of chance at all. Taylor is just a better fighter, close range or long.
Speaking of British prospects, what's your opinion of Anthony Yarde? Hasn't fought at any kind of level yet but seems like the kind of fighter you tend to like: fast, athletic, relaxed but aggressive, good power. Might be worth a look.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Is Ohara Davis better than Terence Crawford?
So you're saying that if O'hara had adopted a competely different fighting style, one that we've never previously seen him employ before and is probably incapable of doing, then he wouldn't have lost to Taylor?Jip wrote:Styles make fights. Had floyd brawl with canelo or maidana he wouldve get tko'd.
Had ohara fight from outside, quick in and out, than he surly wouldve won. Instead he decided to fight close up with a guy who has a good hook and who likes to fight close range and thats what happened.
I think you're simply trying to dig yourself a giant hole.
It's like saying that if Andre Berto had better physical attributes, had much more skill, better handspeed, better timing, better strategy, fantastic foortwork, incredible ring generalship and vastly heavier-handed, then he would have beaten Floyd Mayweather Jr!