I can't believe you're arguing that that isn't a bowl cut. I have no idea what a pageboy cut is but Povetkin's hair in that picture looks exactly how you described, someone has put a bowl over his head and cut the sides. Looks like someone will have to create another thread with a poll as to whether its a bowl or not, I'm not doing it.Kalan wrote:You're a rank idiot if you think that's a bowl cut.. A bowl cut is like a pageboy cut.. Bowl goes over the head and you cut everything that sticks out... Only guys like Keith Thurman and Bermane Stiverne would get most of their hair cut off that way.
BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Povetkin his wife used to have a beautiful haircut
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Looks like Terry O'ConnorWales wrote:handsofstone wrote:Povetkin looks like a fat lesbian
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23071
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
I doubt Clare Balding is incompetent enough to have decade old rules changed in boxing thoughcrusader wrote:Looks like Terry O'ConnorWales wrote:handsofstone wrote:Povetkin looks like a fat lesbian
-
joe strong
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 411
- Joined: 15 Aug 2010, 12:21
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Steward did some work with him but it ended quickly as he knew Fields would get exposed. He said multiple times he was not coordinated enough to box. Arum was trying to get him a big fight & it finally came against Barrett.Kalan wrote:Very TRUE... Both Emmanuel Steward and Bob Arum thought they'd make millions with Tye Fields...when it was already obvious he had Primo Carnera's chin.joe strong wrote:This guy does make a point. Bob Arum was promoting Tye Fields as a "great white hope" for a few years & he stated it several times in post fight interviews on tv. He's big, he's WHITE were his 2 favourite lines describing Fields. Of course he dumped him as soon as Barrett splattered him on the canvas...asdfjkl wrote: I don't know the guy that good, but guys who think like this:
Seems to me like a bit delusional and racist, most white people don't care where a boxer comes from, just if he's good, nice, and fair.
Everybody likes Parker, everybody thinks AJ is the best, and Klitschko used to be the best, got nothing to do with someone's skincolor, TBH I think you're a bit sad if you really think like that. On the other side, I see a lot of Americans thinking, or acting like they think, someone from Russia uses doping, despite all evidence out there shows he's not. This topic is just another example of that, and finally proven wrong, everybody should shut his mouth and/or get banned...
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Steward did not say Fields wasn't coordinated enough to box... He wouldn't have wanted to handle and develop him if he thought that were the case... However it was soon evident he overestimated Tye's fistic talent and he abandoned him. Like he did many others when they failed to show world class potential.
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
I think it's just a very small (though active) group of 'puffers', and I get the sense that much of it starts with a dislike of Wilder rather than a liking of Povetkin. Povetkin got widely shitt on for a long time, and didn't really become a major forum presence until the Wilder fight popped up.
For several years now he's tended to give explosive performances, and he's fought better opposition than all active non-Wlad heavyweights, so there's good reason to like him.
For several years now he's tended to give explosive performances, and he's fought better opposition than all active non-Wlad heavyweights, so there's good reason to like him.
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
He DIDN'T get busted a 2nd time, brainless... After months of "investigation" he was was found to be INNOCENT of taking ANY banned substance in the Wilder fight... The only allegation still against Povetkin was the preposterous claim that he had 1/10th of a nanogram of Ostarine in his system for the Stiverne fight... There is NOTHING from any other lab backing up VADA on that test -- and it's such a minute amount it's impossible to prove or disprove. That's the way VADA planned it. The innuendo they put out for months about the Wilder fight proves their motives were to destroy Povetkin, Ryabinski, and Russia as a viable venue for Heavyweight Championship Fights so their promoter friends wouldn't be continuously outbid for those fights.greg wrote:I am wondering why you are still adamant believing he's innocent, it's not like you spend 24 hours a day with him and are in possession of some knowledge that we don't..he's just another boxer and he's a (very) good one at that, at least he was very good, but hey, that's not good enough, ..by the way, once he got busted second time, even his Russian hardcore fans started to have doubts...asdfjkl wrote:Well I'm certainly not family of Povetkin, nobody in my family has ever been in Russia at all as far as I know.
Povetkin is innocent, and if that subject is openly doubted by other posters on this forum I just educate them, that's all....
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
I really don't understand why so many people hate Povetkin. Is it just hate for Russians in general?
Guy is a really good boxer. Has an entertaining style.
Povetkin VS anyone in the top 10 would make great fight. I would love to see any of those matches.
And still people are celebrating when he gets screwed... And defend Wilder when he ducked Povetkin
Povetkin is good for boxing and I hope to see him championship fights before he gets way too old.
Guy is a really good boxer. Has an entertaining style.
Povetkin VS anyone in the top 10 would make great fight. I would love to see any of those matches.
And still people are celebrating when he gets screwed... And defend Wilder when he ducked Povetkin
Povetkin is good for boxing and I hope to see him championship fights before he gets way too old.
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Hey Povetkin, your English is getting so much better. But it's a little too obvious that your just trying to keep your name relevant and annoy the real fans of the sport so go away.Heretic wrote:I really don't understand why so many people hate Povetkin. Is it just hate for Russians in general?
Guy is a really good boxer. Has an entertaining style.
Povetkin VS anyone in the top 10 would make great fight. I would love to see any of those matches.
And still people are celebrating when he gets screwed... And defend Wilder when he ducked Povetkin![]()
Povetkin is good for boxing and I hope to see him championship fights before he gets way too old.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Wow, how sad can you be caldo? I thought I've seen it all.caldo2025 wrote:Hey Povetkin, your English is getting so much better. But it's a little too obvious that your just trying to keep your name relevant and annoy the real fans of the sport so go away.Heretic wrote:I really don't understand why so many people hate Povetkin. Is it just hate for Russians in general?
Guy is a really good boxer. Has an entertaining style.
Povetkin VS anyone in the top 10 would make great fight. I would love to see any of those matches.
And still people are celebrating when he gets screwed... And defend Wilder when he ducked Povetkin![]()
Povetkin is good for boxing and I hope to see him championship fights before he gets way too old.
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
caldo2025 wrote:Hey Povetkin, your English is getting so much better. But it's a little too obvious that your just trying to keep your name relevant and annoy the real fans of the sport so go away.Heretic wrote:I really don't understand why so many people hate Povetkin. Is it just hate for Russians in general?
Guy is a really good boxer. Has an entertaining style.
Povetkin VS anyone in the top 10 would make great fight. I would love to see any of those matches.
And still people are celebrating when he gets screwed... And defend Wilder when he ducked Povetkin![]()
Povetkin is good for boxing and I hope to see him championship fights before he gets way too old.
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
LOL come on asdfjkl...you mean to tell me that Heretic woke up this morning and just had to add on to an old post about Povetkin pumping his tires about how he so wishes that he could fight for a title? I mean, Heretic had to go and dig for this one to add onto it. It HAS to be Povetkin himself or YOU. Either way, it's pathetic. You must agree.asdfjkl wrote:Wow, how sad can you be caldo? I thought I've seen it all.caldo2025 wrote:Hey Povetkin, your English is getting so much better. But it's a little too obvious that your just trying to keep your name relevant and annoy the real fans of the sport so go away.Heretic wrote:I really don't understand why so many people hate Povetkin. Is it just hate for Russians in general?
Guy is a really good boxer. Has an entertaining style.
Povetkin VS anyone in the top 10 would make great fight. I would love to see any of those matches.
And still people are celebrating when he gets screwed... And defend Wilder when he ducked Povetkin![]()
Povetkin is good for boxing and I hope to see him championship fights before he gets way too old.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Not for meHeretic wrote:I really don't understand why so many people hate Povetkin. Is it just hate for Russians in general?
It's his stupid fkin haircut
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
I don't hate him, complete indifference.
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
The thread was already on the first page. Someone bumped it before Heretic posted...
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
He posted 6 hours after the guy before? Povetkin has been mandatory for 3 years(!) And then got banned for false reasons while he's an innocent athlete?! And now the WBC made someone else the mandatory, a guy who's inactive for 3 years, the only thing he did is getting busted for drugsuse? You don't stand up for the innocent guy, but even openly hate on everyone who does stand up for him and occuse him from things he hasn't even done as well?caldo2025 wrote:LOL come on asdfjkl...you mean to tell me that Heretic woke up this morning and just had to add on to an old post about Povetkin pumping his tires about how he so wishes that he could fight for a title? I mean, Heretic had to go and dig for this one to add onto it. It HAS to be Povetkin himself or YOU. Either way, it's pathetic. You must agree.asdfjkl wrote:Wow, how sad can you be caldo? I thought I've seen it all.caldo2025 wrote:
Hey Povetkin, your English is getting so much better. But it's a little too obvious that your just trying to keep your name relevant and annoy the real fans of the sport so go away.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9453
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Wilder was the mandatory when he won the belt 2 and a half years ago.asdfjkl wrote:He posted 6 hours after the guy before? Povetkin has been mandatory for 3 years(!) And then got banned for false reasons while he's an innocent athlete?! And now the WBC made someone else the mandatory, a guy who's inactive for 3 years, the only thing he did is getting busted for drugsuse? You don't stand up for the innocent guy, but even openly hate on everyone who does stand up for him and occuse him from things he hasn't even done as well?caldo2025 wrote:LOL come on asdfjkl...you mean to tell me that Heretic woke up this morning and just had to add on to an old post about Povetkin pumping his tires about how he so wishes that he could fight for a title? I mean, Heretic had to go and dig for this one to add onto it. It HAS to be Povetkin himself or YOU. Either way, it's pathetic. You must agree.asdfjkl wrote: Wow, how sad can you be caldo? I thought I've seen it all.
At least keep your story straight
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Excuse, 2 and a bit years ago indeed.tiny_acres wrote:Wilder was the mandatory when he won the belt 2 and a half years ago.asdfjkl wrote:He posted 6 hours after the guy before? Povetkin has been mandatory for 3 years(!) And then got banned for false reasons while he's an innocent athlete?! And now the WBC made someone else the mandatory, a guy who's inactive for 3 years, the only thing he did is getting busted for drugsuse? You don't stand up for the innocent guy, but even openly hate on everyone who does stand up for him and occuse him from things he hasn't even done as well?caldo2025 wrote:
LOL come on asdfjkl...you mean to tell me that Heretic woke up this morning and just had to add on to an old post about Povetkin pumping his tires about how he so wishes that he could fight for a title? I mean, Heretic had to go and dig for this one to add onto it. It HAS to be Povetkin himself or YOU. Either way, it's pathetic. You must agree.
At least keep your story straight
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Buddy, if your Povetkin story had half as much legs as you thought it did, Povetkin wouldn't ever have to fight again because he'd make way more money in lawsuits for this huge injustice. What's happened? The opposite. A jury took like 30 minutes to figure out Povetkin was guilty and had to pay Wilder for being a druggy. What happened to the defamation case Povetkin had? Why didn't that go anywhere? Because he's dirty...through and through. He came up through the Russian system at it's peak of steroid abuse in the olympics.asdfjkl wrote:He posted 6 hours after the guy before? Povetkin has been mandatory for 3 years(!) And then got banned for false reasons while he's an innocent athlete?! And now the WBC made someone else the mandatory, a guy who's inactive for 3 years, the only thing he did is getting busted for drugsuse? You don't stand up for the innocent guy, but even openly hate on everyone who does stand up for him and occuse him from things he hasn't even done as well?caldo2025 wrote:LOL come on asdfjkl...you mean to tell me that Heretic woke up this morning and just had to add on to an old post about Povetkin pumping his tires about how he so wishes that he could fight for a title? I mean, Heretic had to go and dig for this one to add onto it. It HAS to be Povetkin himself or YOU. Either way, it's pathetic. You must agree.asdfjkl wrote: Wow, how sad can you be caldo? I thought I've seen it all.
Let it go man. Let it go.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Hahahaha, so because the Americans stole money from the Russian it's still the innocent, robbed Russian who should be ashamed? Sorry kiddo, there are piles of flaws in the American law system and they made piles of deathly mistakes. Fact that the innocent guy get's punished and the drugs driver got away with the money of the innocent guy doesn't mean the innocent guy did anything wrong, in fact it proves how sad and corrupt the American lawsystem is. They prefere to steal money above honesty, they act like they think the Russian took Meldonium when it wasn't allowed, while the evidence shows it's clear that he didn't.caldo2025 wrote:Buddy, if your Povetkin story had half as much legs as you thought it did, Povetkin wouldn't ever have to fight again because he'd make way more money in lawsuits for this huge injustice. What's happened? The opposite. A jury took like 30 minutes to figure out Povetkin was guilty and had to pay Wilder for being a druggy. What happened to the defamation case Povetkin had? Why didn't that go anywhere? Because he's dirty...through and through. He came up through the Russian system at it's peak of steroid abuse in the olympics.asdfjkl wrote:He posted 6 hours after the guy before? Povetkin has been mandatory for 3 years(!) And then got banned for false reasons while he's an innocent athlete?! And now the WBC made someone else the mandatory, a guy who's inactive for 3 years, the only thing he did is getting busted for drugsuse? You don't stand up for the innocent guy, but even openly hate on everyone who does stand up for him and occuse him from things he hasn't even done as well?caldo2025 wrote:
LOL come on asdfjkl...you mean to tell me that Heretic woke up this morning and just had to add on to an old post about Povetkin pumping his tires about how he so wishes that he could fight for a title? I mean, Heretic had to go and dig for this one to add onto it. It HAS to be Povetkin himself or YOU. Either way, it's pathetic. You must agree.
Let it go man. Let it go.
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Newsflash bro...I'm fairly certain by your writing that you didn't attend 2 minutes of college so I'm also certain that Russian Lawyers for Povetkin are a lot smarter than you are. With proof like you think you have for Povetkin, you don't lose a LANDMARK case that awards money to the other combatant for a failed drug test postponement. No one has ever won a case for this in the history of the sport...but Wilder did so that should show you how ridiculous your argument is. Let's not even talk about the shiit that Povetkin got caught with vs. Stirvane. I'm sure that was nothing too. Oh i'm boring myself with this. Just stop talking about it please. I beg ya.asdfjkl wrote:Hahahaha, so because the Americans stole money from the Russian it's still the innocent, robbed Russian who should be ashamed? Sorry kiddo, there are piles of flaws in the American law system and they made piles of deathly mistakes. Fact that the innocent guy get's punished and the drugs driver got away with the money of the innocent guy doesn't mean the innocent guy did anything wrong, in fact it proves how sad and corrupt the American lawsystem is. They prefere to steal money above honesty, they act like they think the Russian took Meldonium when it wasn't allowed, while the evidence shows it's clear that he didn't.caldo2025 wrote:Buddy, if your Povetkin story had half as much legs as you thought it did, Povetkin wouldn't ever have to fight again because he'd make way more money in lawsuits for this huge injustice. What's happened? The opposite. A jury took like 30 minutes to figure out Povetkin was guilty and had to pay Wilder for being a druggy. What happened to the defamation case Povetkin had? Why didn't that go anywhere? Because he's dirty...through and through. He came up through the Russian system at it's peak of steroid abuse in the olympics.asdfjkl wrote: He posted 6 hours after the guy before? Povetkin has been mandatory for 3 years(!) And then got banned for false reasons while he's an innocent athlete?! And now the WBC made someone else the mandatory, a guy who's inactive for 3 years, the only thing he did is getting busted for drugsuse? You don't stand up for the innocent guy, but even openly hate on everyone who does stand up for him and occuse him from things he hasn't even done as well?
Let it go man. Let it go.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Not sure if you're delusional, plain dumb, an actor, close partners of the criminals or a mixture of several of these things. You should be aware that lawyers don't have unlimited powers, within the IS and America that's very easely visable to see. I'm fairly certain you're not even intelligent enough to become a lawyer, so you'll most likely never realise, but you can take my word of it.caldo2025 wrote:Newsflash bro...I'm fairly certain by your writing that you didn't attend 2 minutes of college so I'm also certain that Russian Lawyers for Povetkin are a lot smarter than you are. With proof like you think you have for Povetkin, you don't lose a LANDMARK case that awards money to the other combatant for a failed drug test postponement. No one has ever won a case for this in the history of the sport...but Wilder did so that should show you how ridiculous your argument is. Let's not even talk about the shiit that Povetkin got caught with vs. Stirvane. I'm sure that was nothing too. Oh i'm boring myself with this. Just stop talking about it please. I beg ya.asdfjkl wrote:Hahahaha, so because the Americans stole money from the Russian it's still the innocent, robbed Russian who should be ashamed? Sorry kiddo, there are piles of flaws in the American law system and they made piles of deathly mistakes. Fact that the innocent guy get's punished and the drugs driver got away with the money of the innocent guy doesn't mean the innocent guy did anything wrong, in fact it proves how sad and corrupt the American lawsystem is. They prefere to steal money above honesty, they act like they think the Russian took Meldonium when it wasn't allowed, while the evidence shows it's clear that he didn't.caldo2025 wrote:
Buddy, if your Povetkin story had half as much legs as you thought it did, Povetkin wouldn't ever have to fight again because he'd make way more money in lawsuits for this huge injustice. What's happened? The opposite. A jury took like 30 minutes to figure out Povetkin was guilty and had to pay Wilder for being a druggy. What happened to the defamation case Povetkin had? Why didn't that go anywhere? Because he's dirty...through and through. He came up through the Russian system at it's peak of steroid abuse in the olympics.
Let it go man. Let it go.
Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Yawn...I'm bored with you. I know it's a big day for you girls and your fake Povetkin news so I'm going to watch The Open until you idiots pipe down for awhile and you let us real fans discuss real boxing. Have fun.asdfjkl wrote:Not sure if you're delusional, plain dumb, an actor, close partners of the criminals or a mixture of several of these things. You should be aware that lawyers don't have unlimited powers, within the IS and America that's very easely visable to see. I'm fairly certain you're not even intelligent enough to become a lawyer, so you'll most likely never realise, but you can take my word of it.caldo2025 wrote:Newsflash bro...I'm fairly certain by your writing that you didn't attend 2 minutes of college so I'm also certain that Russian Lawyers for Povetkin are a lot smarter than you are. With proof like you think you have for Povetkin, you don't lose a LANDMARK case that awards money to the other combatant for a failed drug test postponement. No one has ever won a case for this in the history of the sport...but Wilder did so that should show you how ridiculous your argument is. Let's not even talk about the shiit that Povetkin got caught with vs. Stirvane. I'm sure that was nothing too. Oh i'm boring myself with this. Just stop talking about it please. I beg ya.asdfjkl wrote: Hahahaha, so because the Americans stole money from the Russian it's still the innocent, robbed Russian who should be ashamed? Sorry kiddo, there are piles of flaws in the American law system and they made piles of deathly mistakes. Fact that the innocent guy get's punished and the drugs driver got away with the money of the innocent guy doesn't mean the innocent guy did anything wrong, in fact it proves how sad and corrupt the American lawsystem is. They prefere to steal money above honesty, they act like they think the Russian took Meldonium when it wasn't allowed, while the evidence shows it's clear that he didn't.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: BAN THE POVETKIN PUFFERS ALREADY!!!
Are you drunk?caldo2025 wrote:Yawn...I'm bored with you. I know it's a big day for you girls and your fake Povetkin news so I'm going to watch The Open until you idiots pipe down for awhile and you let us real fans discuss real boxing. Have fun.asdfjkl wrote:Not sure if you're delusional, plain dumb, an actor, close partners of the criminals or a mixture of several of these things. You should be aware that lawyers don't have unlimited powers, within the IS and America that's very easely visable to see. I'm fairly certain you're not even intelligent enough to become a lawyer, so you'll most likely never realise, but you can take my word of it.caldo2025 wrote:
Newsflash bro...I'm fairly certain by your writing that you didn't attend 2 minutes of college so I'm also certain that Russian Lawyers for Povetkin are a lot smarter than you are. With proof like you think you have for Povetkin, you don't lose a LANDMARK case that awards money to the other combatant for a failed drug test postponement. No one has ever won a case for this in the history of the sport...but Wilder did so that should show you how ridiculous your argument is. Let's not even talk about the shiit that Povetkin got caught with vs. Stirvane. I'm sure that was nothing too. Oh i'm boring myself with this. Just stop talking about it please. I beg ya.
