British Boxings Underachievers?

Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Stuarty »

Who can you think of recently or in the past who didn't quite hit the heights their talent merited? A lot of people would say big Auds but in hindsight he had a decent enough career and just didn't live up to the hype.

I was just thinking of Alex Arthur there which prompted this thread. I honestly think he massively underachieved considering the talent he had. Heard that he was difficult to deal with in the gym and never listened. Also switched trainers quite a lot.

Anyone think of anymore?
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12048
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Taansend »

Stuarty30 wrote:Who can you think of recently or in the past who didn't quite hit the heights their talent merited? A lot of people would say big Auds but in hindsight he had a decent enough career and just didn't live up to the hype.

I was just thinking of Alex Arthur there which prompted this thread. I honestly think he massively underachieved considering the talent he had. Heard that he was difficult to deal with in the gym and never listened. Also switched trainers quite a lot.

Anyone think of anymore?
Didn't Arthur say that the drive to the gym made his back hurt?

Going back a couple of decades I thought Colin McMillan head great skills but his body let him down.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Stuarty »

Taansend wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Who can you think of recently or in the past who didn't quite hit the heights their talent merited? A lot of people would say big Auds but in hindsight he had a decent enough career and just didn't live up to the hype.

I was just thinking of Alex Arthur there which prompted this thread. I honestly think he massively underachieved considering the talent he had. Heard that he was difficult to deal with in the gym and never listened. Also switched trainers quite a lot.

Anyone think of anymore?
Didn't Arthur say that the drive to the gym made his back hurt?

Going back a couple of decades I thought Colin McMillan head great skills but his body let him down.
That rings a bell mate yeah. Looks as if he's been rattling the roids recently man. My mate treats him sometimes and says he's pumped up to fukk!
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by skanksta »

I KNOW he achieved a lot but Naz for me.

Staying humble, not believing your own hype, staying loyal to the team that got you there - all those cliches you hear thrown at starry prospects - he ignored them all and paid the price. He coulda/shoulda been in the TBE conversations and he only just snuck in to the HOF.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Counter-puncher »

With better focus I think The Cockfeeder could have won a world title

Not that he would be a guy who made 5 defences necessarily, but if you look at Burns and Crolla doing so, on lesser talent in my opinion, then you'd have to say Mitchell underachieved.

Stopping Murray when he did was world class form IMO
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by davie »

Counter-puncher wrote:With better focus I think The Cockfeeder could have won a world title

Not that he would be a guy who made 5 defences necessarily, but if you look at Burns and Crolla doing so, on lesser talent in my opinion, then you'd have to say Mitchell underachieved.

Stopping Murray when he did was world class form IMO
I was just talking about his underachieving the other day, he really did look like he had world class talent at times.
Couldn't believe Burns sparked him
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by davie »

I was also talking about Arthur the other day.

We were discussing having a Scottish fighter with a bit of buzz about them as the come through the ranks (in reference to Josh Taylor)
Arthur was a prospect everyone expected to make it while Burns most thought would struggle at Euro level or beyond
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4941
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by rd350lc »

If Tyson fury never fights again you could put him in the list without question
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Crease »

Stuarty30 wrote:Who can you think of recently or in the past who didn't quite hit the heights their talent merited?
Okay, it's always controversial subjects like these because we all rate boxers differently, but I'll give it a bash and see what I come up with.

Paul McCloskey
Dudey was turning some heads with silky boxing skills and his accurate southpaw style. He won the European title and finally broke into the World top 10, but Just as he was on the threshold a number of bad management decision cost him a great opportunity at fighting for a vacant World Championship.
First off, he should NEVER has fought Amir Khan. Khan had been talking about moving up in weight along with Tim Bradley & Devon Alexander... This would have left the field clear for Paul to pick up one of the three titles that were left behind. But alas, he tried to do too much, too soon and ballsed it all up in the end.


Bernard Dunne
I'm still convinced to this very day that Dunne was one of the top operators at Super Bantamweight for a couple of years there. But again, he came up against a monster in his prime when he fought Kiko Martinez. Then later he lost to Poonsawat Kratingdaenggym - another brilliant fighter who would also go on to World honours.

There's no shame in losing to either of those men in their prime, but I just can't help feeling that Bernard could have and should have done more in his career...


Eamon Magee
Magee should have went on to become a force at Light Welterweight & I do believe that he had the destructive power to be one of the best punchers that we've ever seen in that division. But his bad temper, his jealousy toward his ex wife and his generally mad behaviour with drink in him cost him a World title and a VERY luxurious career.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Frankie Gavin recently, Kirkland Laing going back.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Tomasino »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Frankie Gavin recently, Kirkland Laing going back.

I watched Gavin live at ringside recently and you'd never have thought he won World Am gold. Was sad in a way.
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by littlepug »

Michael Jennings, pat Barrett and Derek angol
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Crease »

Tomasino wrote:I watched Gavin live at ringside recently and you'd never have thought he won World Am gold. Was sad in a way.
I do agree with that.

Gavin hasn't been the same fighter since the Bundu fight, I'm not sure if he lost confidence in himself or what it was. Then he lost something again when Brook destroyed him. I know that Frankie is trying to rebuild his career, but he just doesn't look the same fighter he did when he was a young prospect 5/6 years ago.

At this point, I'm unconvinced that he'll ever make a breakthrough to the top level...
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Crease »

Ian Napa

After his loss to Damaen Kelly, I thought that he had learned and put it all behind him when he won the European title, but alas his inconsistency kept catching up with him & when he lost that fight to Jamie McDonnell that spelt out the end for him.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Tomasino wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Frankie Gavin recently, Kirkland Laing going back.

I watched Gavin live at ringside recently and you'd never have thought he won World Am gold. Was sad in a way.
I pegged him for big things.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Tomasino »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Tomasino wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Frankie Gavin recently, Kirkland Laing going back.

I watched Gavin live at ringside recently and you'd never have thought he won World Am gold. Was sad in a way.
I pegged him for big things.

He had some moves but got caught by some wild swings and had to dig his toes in to discourage the guy. I spoke to him after and he was sound, seemed a gentleman. The other boxers on the bill said he was a great guy in the changing rooms, giving friendly advice and was very relaxed. His reflexes and speed, even his footwork, it just wasn't what it was.
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by boxingknockout »

Counter-puncher wrote:With better focus I think The Cockfeeder could have won a world title

Not that he would be a guy who made 5 defences necessarily, but if you look at Burns and Crolla doing so, on lesser talent in my opinion, then you'd have to say Mitchell underachieved.

Stopping Murray when he did was world class form IMO
Cockfeeder wasn't good enough or tough enough. He was well touted as an amateur but just not sturdy enough.
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by boxingknockout »

Crease wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Who can you think of recently or in the past who didn't quite hit the heights their talent merited?
Okay, it's always controversial subjects like these because we all rate boxers differently, but I'll give it a bash and see what I come up with.

Paul McCloskey
Dudey was turning some heads with silky boxing skills and his accurate southpaw style. He won the European title and finally broke into the World top 10, but Just as he was on the threshold a number of bad management decision cost him a great opportunity at fighting for a vacant World Championship.
First off, he should NEVER has fought Amir Khan. Khan had been talking about moving up in weight along with Tim Bradley & Devon Alexander... This would have left the field clear for Paul to pick up one of the three titles that were left behind. But alas, he tried to do too much, too soon and ballsed it all up in the end.


Bernard Dunne
I'm still convinced to this very day that Dunne was one of the top operators at Super Bantamweight for a couple of years there. But again, he came up against a monster in his prime when he fought Kiko Martinez. Then later he lost to Poonsawat Kratingdaenggym - another brilliant fighter who would also go on to World honours.

There's no shame in losing to either of those men in their prime, but I just can't help feeling that Bernard could have and should have done more in his career...


Eamon Magee
Magee should have went on to become a force at Light Welterweight & I do believe that he had the destructive power to be one of the best punchers that we've ever seen in that division. But his bad temper, his jealousy toward his ex wife and his generally mad behaviour with drink in him cost him a World title and a VERY luxurious career.
Are you serious????! :lol: :lol:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by crusader »

I think Dunne may have overachieved. He wasn't really that tight of a boxer, his power was about average, and he didn't exactly have a good chin (look at how he melted against Poonsawat). He did very well to win the EBU and WBA titles, the latter being earned against a respectable opponent in an excellent fight.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Covfefe »

rd350lc wrote:If Tyson fury never fights again you could put him in the list without question
Undisputed heavyweight world champion? Not sure he'll ever get any further on than that, even without the break.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4941
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by rd350lc »

Covfefe wrote:
rd350lc wrote:If Tyson fury never fights again you could put him in the list without question
Undisputed heavyweight world champion? Not sure he'll ever get any further on than that, even without the break.
Yes he could

He could have actually proved he was the best and took on all the best fighters at the weight and beat them .

Was his career fulfilled in dullfest of a fight where he fiddled his way to the win ?
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Covfefe »

rd350lc wrote:
Covfefe wrote:
rd350lc wrote:If Tyson fury never fights again you could put him in the list without question
Undisputed heavyweight world champion? Not sure he'll ever get any further on than that, even without the break.
Yes he could

He could have actually proved he was the best and took on all the best fighters at the weight and beat them .

Was his career fulfilled in dullfest of a fight where he fiddled his way to the win ?
Fiddled his way to the win? By out pointing the heavyweight champion away in Germany?

I don't think he has the temperament to be a long term champion, I think this is as good as it will get for Tyson, and I think he's achieved very well.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4941
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by rd350lc »

Covfefe wrote:
rd350lc wrote:
Covfefe wrote:
Undisputed heavyweight world champion? Not sure he'll ever get any further on than that, even without the break.
Yes he could

He could have actually proved he was the best and took on all the best fighters at the weight and beat them .

Was his career fulfilled in dullfest of a fight where he fiddled his way to the win ?
Fiddled his way to the win? By out pointing the heavyweight champion away in Germany?

I don't think he has the temperament to be a long term champion, I think this is as good as it will get for Tyson, and I think he's achieved very well.
Yes he danced and fiddled his way to the win .

Joshua and Klitschko gave us far more entertainment and in Germany the result would have been the same

The fight with Fury was one of the dullest heavyweight title fights In living memory and Fury had a part to play in that .

Fury still had the beating of many of the top heavyweights and to conclude his career in the manner he has leaves many questions .
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by crusader »

I don't see why him 'fiddling' to a win is particularly relevant if we're talking about underachieving. Boring, sure, but he still achieved a HW title winning victory over the long dominant and reigning champ.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: British Boxings Underachievers?

Post by Covfefe »

rd350lc wrote:
Covfefe wrote:
rd350lc wrote:
Yes he could

He could have actually proved he was the best and took on all the best fighters at the weight and beat them .

Was his career fulfilled in dullfest of a fight where he fiddled his way to the win ?
Fiddled his way to the win? By out pointing the heavyweight champion away in Germany?

I don't think he has the temperament to be a long term champion, I think this is as good as it will get for Tyson, and I think he's achieved very well.
Yes he danced and fiddled his way to the win .

Joshua and Klitschko gave us far more entertainment and in Germany the result would have been the same

The fight with Fury was one of the dullest heavyweight title fights In living memory and Fury had a part to play in that .

Fury still had the beating of many of the top heavyweights and to conclude his career in the manner he has leaves many questions .
What does it matter if it was boring? Ffs.

He beat the long reigning heavyweight champion in his backyard and you criticise the way he did it? There really is no pleasing everyone. :brick:
Post Reply