Does AJ vs Pulev whet your appetite?

kbackup408
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1662
Joined: 08 Sep 2016, 12:58

Does AJ vs Pulev whet your appetite?

Post by kbackup408 »

I'll be honest lads as soft as the subject title sounds, if this Pulev fight happens ill be bitterly disappointed going from one of the most exciting HW fights to a clinch fest is depressing !

What do you guys feel?
Last edited by kbackup408 on 06 Aug 2017, 21:30, edited 1 time in total.
dirk2686
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1982
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 09:35

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by dirk2686 »

I like to think I'm pragmatic about it. At this moment with everyone who he could potentially fight Joshua doesn't have that many 'big' fights. Wilder is one, Fury is another albeit with massive caveats about his time out of the ring, shape and health. Beyond them two? There are 'name' fights like Haye but I don't think anyone believes Haye has much hope in the fight. Wlad is gone. Parker is so much smaller and gets hit far too much by a monster like Joshua to have a serious chance. Talk of Ward is nonsense. Hughie is very green. Ortiz is, for me, overrated but not a terrible shout, probably in the same vein as Pulev. As for Povetkin, god knows.

Therefore I accept he is going to have average fights and not every fight can be huge. To be fair this has always been the case. Lewis may very well have fought Holyfield and Tyson but he also went in with the likes of Mavrovic and Botha. Holyfield was in some legendary fights but you can't keep active against the absolute elite, hence Czyz and Bean.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by crusader »

No, but how much better can it realistically get? People talk like the division is loaded with talent now, but Pulev is still near the top.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by Horse »

Very good opponent for Joshua.

Anyone who slags this fight off should suggest 5 opponents that they think are better.

It would be Joshua's 2nd best opponent and a win would boost his record hugely.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by Sklar »

Whet
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by Horse »

Sklar wrote:Whet
Quite right.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32679
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Sklar wrote:Whet
What
Tarkus
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by Tarkus »

I like this fight. Pulev is not a clincher, he is a jabber. Not too exciting in style but he would be the only top level opponent for AJ so far, other then 40 years old Klitschko. I like to see how he deals with Pulev.

After this maybe he can lure Wilder in the ring. If not, Ortiz. And in the end Parker/Hughie winner.
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3302
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Sklar wrote:Whet
What
Very whitty

:salut:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by crusader »

CaptainSpacerod wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Sklar wrote:Whet
What
Very whitty

:salut:
You mean whetty
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by BitPlayer »

It's a solid opponent. Other than maybe Wilder, I don't any opponent could have lived up to Wlad
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by Horse »

BitPlayer wrote:It's a solid opponent. Other than maybe Wilder, I don't any opponent could have lived up to Wlad
Wlad's far better than Wilder.

It's all downhill from here.
TheGingerBomber
Lightweight
Posts: 1233
Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by TheGingerBomber »

Horse wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:It's a solid opponent. Other than maybe Wilder, I don't any opponent could have lived up to Wlad
Wlad's far better than Wilder.

It's all downhill from here.
Gotta wait for those prospects to ripen.

Who realistically do you's see challenging AJ prospect wise? Certainly Dubois is on his way...but that's a LONG way.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by crusader »

There's really not all that much out there in terms of good opponents. The division is about as weak as it was when people moaned about it during Wlad's reign..
dirk2686
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1982
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 09:35

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by dirk2686 »

crusader wrote:There's really not all that much out there in terms of good opponents. The division is about as weak as it was when people moaned about it during Wlad's reign..
I don't think people moaned about the division being weak as much as they moaned about Wlad having a horrible, safety first, brutally boring approach.

Heavyweight boxing was absolutely booming when you had Mike Tyson destroying mismatched opposition in a few rounds. It's just what people like.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by crusader »

People moaned all the time about the quality of his opposition, how poor the division generally was, and how he was never in competitive fights. When he faced Haye there was loads of 'oh, finally he's facing a decent opponent'.
Last edited by crusader on 03 Aug 2017, 15:01, edited 1 time in total.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by Horse »

TheGingerBomber wrote:Gotta wait for those prospects to ripen.

Who realistically do you's see challenging AJ prospect wise? Certainly Dubois is on his way...but that's a LONG way.
What prospects?

Joshua fighting top 5 available opposition is all that he can do and all of those opponents have a real chance against him.

Joshua is not the perfect fighting machine. He clearly has flaws and he can be beaten.

Pulev is a top 5 opponent and he is a genuine threat.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by Ricky_ »

Yes, i think Pulev can beat Joshua.
dirk2686
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1982
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 09:35

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by dirk2686 »

crusader wrote:People moaned all the time about the quality of his opposition, how poor the division generally was, and how he was never in competitive fights. When he faced Haye there was loads of 'oh, finally he's facing a decent opponent'.
I'm not saying it wasn't mentioned but if Wlad was steamrollering people in the way fighters who tend to be really popular was doing then he'd have been champion in a far more favourably looked upon time.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by crusader »

I'm not sure that Wlad crushing his opponents in a more entertaining manner would lead people to rate his opposition higher, and my point was about opposition. There was loads of criticism of who Wlad fought and who was out there to fight, and it wasn't insignificant compared to the volume of criticism he got for his style.
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by keirw »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Sklar wrote:Whet
What
Pardon
dirk2686
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1982
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 09:35

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by dirk2686 »

crusader wrote:I'm not sure that Wlad crushing his opponents in a more entertaining manner would lead people to rate his opposition higher, and my point was about opposition. There was loads of criticism of who Wlad fought and who was out there to fight, and it wasn't insignificant compared to the volume of criticism he got for his style.
I know your point was about opposition. My point was that he did himself no favours with his style.

Remember the Ibragimov fight? He won easy but it was so boring. Tyson had opponents like Ibragimov and he destroyed them. Like it or not if you want to be absolutely massive you need to be wrecking people or getting involved in wars unless you're a Floyd type who people pay to see lose.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by crusader »

No doubt

And, despite being slated continually, the guys he could've crushed in more entertaining fashion were not really much weaker, if at all, than the guys around today. The overall quality of today's division is pretty poor, at least if the same is to be said about the division during Wlad's reign. That's why I don't see how opponents like Pulev can be deemed weak challengers; there's just not that much out there.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by Horse »

crusader wrote:No doubt

And, despite being slated continually, the guys he could've crushed in more entertaining fashion were not really much weaker, if at all, than the guys around today. The overall quality of today's division is pretty poor, at least if the same is to be said about the division during Wlad's reign. That's why I don't see how opponents like Pulev can be deemed weak challengers; there's just not that much out there.
I'm a Joshua hater, but any attempt to call Joshua a bottom-feeder for fighting someone like Pulev is absolute garbage.

He's one of the best opponents available.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Does AJ vs Pulev wet your appetite?

Post by crusader »

I agree

IMO AJ has been matched pretty well. His rate of progression has certainly been much, much faster than those of rival Ortiz and Wilder.
Post Reply