Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
99-91, 100-90, 100-90
= farkin joke
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
What happened? Was it not as one sided as the scores indicate?AntonS wrote:99-91, 100-90, 100-90![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
= farkin joke
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
He was penalized 1pt for holding, but even so IMO he deserved better than that. Was constantly on the attack & had Mitchell backpedaling fair bit of time.
It was hardly a walk in the park.
It was hardly a walk in the park.
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
Who were the Judges?AntonS wrote:He was penalized 1pt for holding, but even so IMO he deserved better than that. Was constantly on the attack & had Mitchell backpedaling fair bit of time.
It was hardly a walk in the park.
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
judge: Paul Le 100-90 | judge: Lynne Kennedy 100-90 | judge: Andrew Campbell 99-91
Maybe, main events should go on midway, while judges care still awake & not way past 10.30pm
Maybe, main events should go on midway, while judges care still awake & not way past 10.30pm
-
Boxing Prospect
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
Why was an OPBF title fight only over 10 rounds?
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
10 or 12 is allowed these days, because most other regional titles are contested over 10Boxing Prospect wrote:Why was an OPBF title fight only over 10 rounds?
-
Boxing Prospect
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
I know it's allowed, just feels wrong, it's supposed to be a stepping stone to a world title fight, not a freaking third tier belt
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
OPBF is no longer what it was once upon a time - road to possible WBC world title...as was Commonwealth title, which unfortunately has also fallen into less important bracket.Boxing Prospect wrote:I know it's allowed, just feels wrong, it's supposed to be a stepping stone to a world title fight, not a freaking third tier belt
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
Least they were all close. I seen a split draw in Toowoomba and one judge had it 40-36 and one had it 40-36 the other way. Probably ended up the right decision but 2 judges shouldn't be that far out.AntonS wrote:judge: Paul Le 100-90 | judge: Lynne Kennedy 100-90 | judge: Andrew Campbell 99-91
Maybe, main events should go on midway, while judges care still awake & not way past 10.30pm
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
Possibly yet another case, where judges didn't focus on what they considerd underdog. If they did, I'm sure their score would be somewhat differentfox wrote:Least they were all close. I seen a split draw in Toowoomba and one judge had it 40-36 and one had it 40-36 the other way. Probably ended up the right decision but 2 judges shouldn't be that far out.AntonS wrote:judge: Paul Le 100-90 | judge: Lynne Kennedy 100-90 | judge: Andrew Campbell 99-91
Maybe, main events should go on midway, while judges care still awake & not way past 10.30pm
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
" one judge had it 40-36 and one had it 40-36 the other way "
I recall same happening in Adelaide. One judge was totally different to other 2. After 2 rounds, I (recorder on the night) promptly approached him I asked him to name boxers........He had them mixed up - both were making their debut & was unfamiliar with them.
I recall same happening in Adelaide. One judge was totally different to other 2. After 2 rounds, I (recorder on the night) promptly approached him I asked him to name boxers........He had them mixed up - both were making their debut & was unfamiliar with them.
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Mitchell vs Yilixiate score???
Its not as if this bias judging just begun 