Duh. Go drink a few pints while your add it.Ossyrules wrote:Great response you clearly know your boxingMachoTime wrote:What the fu*k would you know. Wlad would have slaughtered the little midget. Go Back to England.Ossyrules wrote:Kalan you're a slave to numbers, and hugely under estimate fighters of yesteryear. Nobody in today's boxing knows how to fight inside like the old guys could, and Frazier was one of the best ever. A supremely strong and resilient guy. Cut from a completely different cloth to today's guys.
There is no evidence Wlad could deal with a guy like Frazier. Saying foreman beat Frazier really is a poor arguement from you
Facking melt
WLAD RETIRES
Re: WLAD RETIRES
Re: WLAD RETIRES
Frazier would have broken Wlad down. Wlad never fought a Frazier. They haven't existed in the HW division after Tyson.
Now Wlad was a much better older fighter. If we're going to count talent from 35 years old and on, Wlad wins hands down against Ali and Frazier. But w/ them all at their very best, I see the order 1) Ali, 2) Frazier 3) Wlad.
Now Wlad was a much better older fighter. If we're going to count talent from 35 years old and on, Wlad wins hands down against Ali and Frazier. But w/ them all at their very best, I see the order 1) Ali, 2) Frazier 3) Wlad.
Last edited by Tony1244 on 07 Aug 2017, 08:58, edited 1 time in total.
Re: WLAD RETIRES
I'm on it, I'll meet you at the pubMachoTime wrote:Duh. Go drink a few pints while your add it.Ossyrules wrote:Great response you clearly know your boxingMachoTime wrote:
What the fu*k would you know. Wlad would have slaughtered the little midget. Go Back to England.
Facking melt![]()
![]()
Melt
Re: WLAD RETIRES
Im in the USA. You want to come here. No problems Bro you're alright. And no Frazier wouldn't stand a chance against Wlad. My IMOOssyrules wrote:I'm on it, I'll meet you at the pubMachoTime wrote:Duh. Go drink a few pints while your add it.Ossyrules wrote:
Great response you clearly know your boxing
Facking melt![]()
![]()
Melt
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: WLAD RETIRES
I think the fact he was such a slow started would have been his undoing.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Frazier would have battered Wlad.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: WLAD RETIRES
I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: WLAD RETIRES
Whom? The 'prime' wlad started a lot slower than Frazier.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think the fact he was such a slow started would have been his undoing.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Frazier would have battered Wlad.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: WLAD RETIRES
Joe was very fast. I'd pick Tyson too, but I like wlads chances a lot better there. He could hold Mike.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
Re: WLAD RETIRES
Frazier speed is underrated. He's not tyson but he had other qualities, better engine, bigger heart, better resolve, mentally unstoppable.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
Wlad never faced a guy who was trained to get inside the jab and then kill his body
Re: WLAD RETIRES
Frazier is a midget. You should really head down to the pub and slam a few English Crappy beers.Ossyrules wrote:Frazier speed is underrated. He's not tyson but he had other qualities, better engine, bigger heart, better resolve, mentally unstoppable.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
Wlad never faced a guy who was trained to get inside the jab and then kill his body
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: WLAD RETIRES
It's all just hypothesis anyway.
Re: WLAD RETIRES
GOOD------------- no more CLINCHING AND LEANING ON OPPONENTS BACK !!!
fornicate Clinchko. Non aggressive, holding , boring ,
loved when Fury SCHOOLED him .
fornicate Clinchko. Non aggressive, holding , boring ,
loved when Fury SCHOOLED him .
Re: WLAD RETIRES
MachoTime wrote:Frazier is a midget. You should really head down to the pub and slam a few English Crappy beers.Ossyrules wrote:Frazier speed is underrated. He's not tyson but he had other qualities, better engine, bigger heart, better resolve, mentally unstoppable.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
Wlad never faced a guy who was trained to get inside the jab and then kill his body
Frazier wasn't big, but did have a couple of inches in height and reach on Mike Tyson. I thought he was awkward, and very good the way he bobbed around. gave Ali hell. Then he met George Foreman.
Re: WLAD RETIRES
It was a exciting era back then. I think Tyson would have taken the later version of Foreman. Im not so sure about the early Tyson vs. Early Foreman. That would have been a hell of fight..Badhusker wrote:MachoTime wrote:Frazier is a midget. You should really head down to the pub and slam a few English Crappy beers.Ossyrules wrote:
Frazier speed is underrated. He's not tyson but he had other qualities, better engine, bigger heart, better resolve, mentally unstoppable.
Wlad never faced a guy who was trained to get inside the jab and then kill his body
Frazier wasn't big, but did have a couple of inches in height and reach on Mike Tyson. I thought he was awkward, and very good the way he bobbed around. gave Ali hell. Then he met George Foreman.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: WLAD RETIRES
Ali was one of the worst for pulling down on his opponents heads. He was a pretty talented grappler493dart wrote:GOOD------------- no more CLINCHING AND LEANING ON OPPONENTS BACK !!!
eff Clinchko. Non aggressive, holding , boring ,
loved when Fury SCHOOLED him .
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: WLAD RETIRES
Yes that's true. I also feel though he was susceptible to big punchers. He never beat any really big hitters at top level.Ossyrules wrote:Frazier speed is underrated. He's not tyson but he had other qualities, better engine, bigger heart, better resolve, mentally unstoppable.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'd have picked a prime Tyson over wlad. The speed and ecplosiveness would have been too much. Frazier lacked the speed and relied too much on one shot.
Wlad never faced a guy who was trained to get inside the jab and then kill his body