Anthony Crolla vs. Ricky Burns - October 7th 2017

Crolla vs. Burns Winner?

Anthony Crolla
32
55%
Ricky Burns
26
45%
 
Total votes: 58

keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: CrollaBurns

Post by keirw »

Taansend wrote:
Naandrew wrote:
CaptainSpacerod wrote:If Burns wants to stay relevant he should fight the winner of Taylor v Davies.
If Taylor wins I think that is the only fight that makes sense for Burns.

That could be a true changing of the guard in Scotland
Now that would be a big Scottish fight
I imagine the Taylor fight would be a possibility for Burns even if he loses to Crolla
DannyMCR
Welterweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: CrollaBurns

Post by DannyMCR »

Ruthless-RKO wrote:
DannyMCR wrote:Crolla needs a win before he can fight for a WBO title..
You see, Cotto hasn't won either, but he gets a world title shot. I think this rule only applied for Englishman lol
Supposedly the rule is back to back losses prevent you from challenging for one of their titles which must be the case as Cotto is doing so and also Marriaga
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103391
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: CrollaBurns

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

DannyMCR wrote:
Ruthless-RKO wrote:
DannyMCR wrote:Crolla needs a win before he can fight for a WBO title..
You see, Cotto hasn't won either, but he gets a world title shot. I think this rule only applied for Englishman lol
Supposedly the rule is back to back losses prevent you from challenging for one of their titles which must be the case as Cotto is doing so and also Marriaga
So what was Liam Smith's story for going to spain?
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: CrollaBurns

Post by chad »

If I remember correctly the WBO will not let you fight for their title if you where stopped in your last fight or are coming off the back of 2 non stoppage defeats.

I'm not making it up. I'm sure someone took the time to read the rules and posted it either here, or on another forum when Smith turned up in Spain about 4 months ago.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12050
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: CrollaBurns

Post by Taansend »

chad wrote:If I remember correctly the WBO will not let you fight for their title if you where stopped in your last fight or are coming off the back of 2 non stoppage defeats.

I'm not making it up. I'm sure someone took the time to read the rules and posted it either here, or on another forum when Smith turned up in Spain about 4 months ago.
Knock yourself out :D

http://www.wboboxing.com/regulations/
revporl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 498
Joined: 29 Dec 2003, 14:08

Crolla V Burns announced

Post by revporl »

http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12 ... sky-sports

Good matchup I think. Both have already found their level, but its a similar one.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32962
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Crolla V Burns announced

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Good fight, think Crolla wins at this stage of their careers.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Crolla V Burns announced

Post by TheCobra »

Good fight, watchable, would have been nicer 2-3 of years earlier but still interesting to a point.
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1079
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Crolla V Burns announced

Post by ScottDetonator »

Any news if it will be a PPV card? The first question every fight now.
fightfan95
Welterweight
Posts: 883
Joined: 30 Nov 2015, 09:17

Re: Crolla V Burns announced

Post by fightfan95 »

ScottDetonator wrote:Any news if it will be a PPV card? The first question every fight now.
I believe it isn't a PPV - normally when it's a PPV fight, Eddie normally say it's on Sky Box Office when announced. This time he has just said on Sky Sports.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32962
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Crolla V Burns announced

Post by Boxerbeetle »

fightfan95 wrote:
ScottDetonator wrote:Any news if it will be a PPV card? The first question every fight now.
I believe it isn't a PPV - normally when it's a PPV fight, Eddie normally say it's on Sky Box Office when announced. This time he has just said on Sky Sports.
Can't imagine them putting this on PPV, would be an extremely hard sell. 2 fighters not particularly well-known to the casuals, both coming down from losses at world level, and (worst of all) both super nice guys, so unlikely to be any trash talking/flipping tables over!
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3380
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Crolla V Burns announced

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

At lightweight ?
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12050
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: CrollaBurns

Post by Taansend »

So it happened after all.

I like both fighters. Should be a good battle
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12050
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: CrollaBurns

Post by Taansend »

TheGingerBomber wrote:Crackin' little end of the road fight for me, great fight night headline, and if the first's a slobber knocker, make it a trilogy. Would hope they go to Manchester & Scotland.

Unfortunately if this fight happens, the undercard will probably be shite. But I won't complain too much.
Hopefully Eddie will have a decent undercard
DannyMCR
Welterweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: CrollaBurns

Post by DannyMCR »

Taansend wrote:
TheGingerBomber wrote:Crackin' little end of the road fight for me, great fight night headline, and if the first's a slobber knocker, make it a trilogy. Would hope they go to Manchester & Scotland.

Unfortunately if this fight happens, the undercard will probably be shite. But I won't complain too much.
Hopefully Eddie will have a decent undercard
Hopefully but I wouldn't count on it mate, we normally get terrible undercards in Manchester and both Crolla & Burns alone should fill the place
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Crolla V Burns announced

Post by davie »

Good fight with 2 guys at similar levels and career tragectories
2 nice lads and 2 guys who put a shift in. Wont be a technically great fight or likely to see a big KO. But they'll both trade plenty of leather.

At 140 I'd have backed Burns. I think he is the better boxer and would have been more comfortable at the higher weight. At 135 it could be interesting, Burns ability to make the weight could play a factor and at this age Crolla might slightly outwork him
Still fancy Ricky to have enough in the tank with the better technical ability.
117-114 Burns (a few 10-10 rounds in this one)
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Crolla V Burns announced

Post by PredatorHayds »

I see Crolla winning this easily on points.

Of the two I reckon Burns is a lot more shopworn.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Crolla V Burns announced

Post by ILikeBeer »

Image
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Crolla V Burns announced

Post by mullenman »

Well done to both lads

Both seem sound and I'll look forward to this fight
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12050
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: CrollaBurns

Post by Taansend »

DannyMCR wrote:
Taansend wrote:
TheGingerBomber wrote:Crackin' little end of the road fight for me, great fight night headline, and if the first's a slobber knocker, make it a trilogy. Would hope they go to Manchester & Scotland.

Unfortunately if this fight happens, the undercard will probably be shite. But I won't complain too much.
Hopefully Eddie will have a decent undercard
Hopefully but I wouldn't count on it mate, we normally get terrible undercards in Manchester and both Crolla & Burns alone should fill the place
I'm the eternal optimist :D
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Anthony Crolla vs. Ricky Burns - October 7th 2017

Post by wesshaw1985 »

who wins?
TheGingerBomber
Lightweight
Posts: 1233
Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18

Re: CrollaBurns

Post by TheGingerBomber »

DannyMCR wrote:
Taansend wrote:
TheGingerBomber wrote:Crackin' little end of the road fight for me, great fight night headline, and if the first's a slobber knocker, make it a trilogy. Would hope they go to Manchester & Scotland.

Unfortunately if this fight happens, the undercard will probably be shite. But I won't complain too much.
Hopefully Eddie will have a decent undercard
Hopefully but I wouldn't count on it mate, we normally get terrible undercards in Manchester and both Crolla & Burns alone should fill the place
Aye, Eddie needs to get his finger out if he thinks he can whack a couple of prospects on, for me that Liverpool card should be his ambition from now on, feels like he's taking a page from Warren's book with that show, 4 solid domestic clashes.
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3225
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: Crolla v Burns

Post by smiling assassin »

Personally think this fight is poor. Burns is not what he was and have never been a fan of Crolla as a boxer. Burns should of fought Josh Taylor at light welter and Crolla should be fighting Flanagan. Them 2 fights there would get me a lot more excited than this fight
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Crolla v Burns

Post by Stuarty »

smiling assassin wrote:Personally think this fight is poor. Burns is not what he was and have never been a fan of Crolla as a boxer. Burns should of fought Josh Taylor at light welter and Crolla should be fighting Flanagan. Them 2 fights there would get me a lot more excited than this fight
I quite like this fight personally but I agree that I'd rather see the other two fights you mentioned there given a choice.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: CrollaBurns

Post by ILikeBeer »

Taansend wrote: Hopefully Eddie will have a decent undercard
:lol:
Post Reply