Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post Reply
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by chad »

B0xnati0n have gone very quiet about their PPV plan for this event.

Found this earlier on the BT Sport website:

http://sport.bt.com/football/free-bt-sp ... 4200076081

"Anyone signing up for BT Sport for the first time before August 15th, 2017 will get their initial year free. Here's how you can snap up this incredible offer, plus a detailed look at what you get with a BT Sport subscription......... Big-time boxing has arrived on BT Sport after we made B0xNati0n, Britain’s only full-time boxing TV station, available to subscribers earlier this year. World, European and Commonwealth title fights – including the upcoming super-fight between Gennady ‘GGG’ Golovkin and Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez - are among 20 prime-time Saturday events shown throughout the year."

Seems fairly clear the fight will be on BT Sport. Don't know if that means it's not PPV anymore.
Manchester Hitman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by Manchester Hitman »

The Copperbox show which was meant to be the lead in for the original PPV is now on BT/BN. It was a silly idea trying to charge PPV in the first place Which I'm glad to see they have obviously realised. Last time I checked there wasn't even any undercard fights announced yet by GBP so the card below the main is not going to be great.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by Andrew »

Manchester Hitman wrote:The Copperbox show which was meant to be the lead in for the original PPV is now on BT/BN. It was a silly idea trying to charge PPV in the first place Which I'm glad to see they have obviously realised. Last time I checked there wasn't even any undercard fights announced yet by GBP so the card below the main is not going to be great.
That's the thing when the copperbox show was announced PPV wasn't mentioned once.

It's been a few weeks now
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by JimJim2009 »

Fwank can't stage a UK show worthy of PPV for three reasons.

1. He hasn't got the name fighters
2. His shows usually fall apart or change a lot
3. His best fighters are unknown to the public

He should pass on the GGG fight, if the alternative is to charge BN subscribers a separate charge to see it. If he can't make money from the BN subscription and his income from the BT deal it's time to give up.
3132DW
Middleweight
Posts: 1435
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 03:27

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by 3132DW »

Very strange as he kept continually saying announcements will be coming in next few weeks re PPV but nothing since.

Didn't comment on last IFL in regards to it but still shows PPV on allegedly site.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by JimJim2009 »

From a marketing strategy perspective it's probably best to keep your powder dry until after Floyd Mayweather Vs Conor McGregor. That event is absorbing all the media attention.
paddy chavez
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2678
Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by paddy chavez »

I cancelled BN yesterday partly because I thought PPV was taking the piss if you're paying each month.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by JimJim2009 »

I wonder if fwank would ideally want BN subscribers to get it for free, but BT customers would have to pay. I imagine BT would be like, what the fxxk did we pay £100m for then ?! Everyone wants in on PPV but fwank is playing with fire. I can understand the temptation though.
3132DW
Middleweight
Posts: 1435
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 03:27

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by 3132DW »

paddy chavez wrote:I cancelled BN yesterday partly because I thought PPV was taking the piss if you're paying each month.
They had never confirmed subscribers would be paying to date though ? That was just speculation.
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3380
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

I don't understand all the fvcking confusion. We're a month away from the best fight of the year and neither BN nor BT Sport have announced definite plans. It all seems a bit amateurish.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by Andrew »

CaptainSpacerod wrote:I don't understand all the fvcking confusion. We're a month away from the best fight of the year and neither BN nor BT Sport have announced definite plans. It all seems a bit amateurish.
I think they are waiting until after Mayweather and Mcgregor.

Still this needs clarifying sharpish.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by rossij8 »

paddy chavez wrote:I cancelled BN yesterday partly because I thought PPV was taking the piss if you're paying each month.
What did they say at BN? Surely you gave a reason for cancelling and they would have tried to persuade you to stay?
moogie101
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 406
Joined: 15 Nov 2008, 14:11

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by moogie101 »

I never could understand it being PPV in the UK in the first place.

This is a cracking fight but the casuals who you need to buy a PPV to make it a success don't have a clue who either of the fighters are. The boxing fans who can't wait for this fight either already have BN or BT Sports, BN already has a subscription & BT just paid a lot of money to broadcast the best BN fights.
wiley101
Cruiserweight
Posts: 8
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 09:24

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by wiley101 »

Confirmed on the BN twitter that BN subscribers get this included!
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by Andrew »

wiley101 wrote:Confirmed on the BN twitter that BN subscribers get this included!
Link ?

I can't see anything about it ?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

It would do very few PPV'S. Nobody ive mentioned thr fight to, whonisnt a boxing fan has heard of either fighter.
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by broomy7s »

The time its took them to give answers says they were defo looking into charging subscribers. Thank god they seen sense.
3132DW
Middleweight
Posts: 1435
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 03:27

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by 3132DW »

broomy7s wrote:The time its took them to give answers says they were defo looking into charging subscribers. Thank god they seen sense.
I think it's more the Mayweather/McGregror has likely ruined their PPV offering - whatever you think of the fight it's going to do huge numbers where as this fight might be a great contest but won't sell a fraction to Non Boxing fans at 4.30am.

You can see the amount of Non Boxing fans buying Sat night - I work with 4-5 who are all getting it and can't stop talking about it.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by Andrew »

:TU:

Still stuff to confirm. Initially the talk was having a big support card in the uk (Saunders and Flanagan) as part of the PPV to make it a long night.

But when that Saunders show was announced not one mention of PPV at all.

I think it will work like the plan for the distaster out rescheduled Fury Klitchko rematch. The fight is on BN but there will be an easy way for non BN subscribers to pay and watch the fight.
Pukka Cheese
Super Lightweight
Posts: 441
Joined: 31 Mar 2017, 15:06

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by Pukka Cheese »

Would think allegedly sub for x months = free
& everyone else / BT package deal has to pay.

If they had the Hughie - Parker & BJS - Monroe with GGG - Canelo a few hours later as a non allegedly subscriber i might have considered paying for it...

For example what they should (could?) have done
BT:
random undercards
Dubois V AJ Carter
Yarde v Ford
Smith V williams

A allegedly PPV after:
Parker Vs Hughie
BJS vs Monroe
----long wait---
random undercards
Canelo vs GGG

No?

Iv got a feeling ill get one with the Virgin tv package and stream the other 2 though... :TU:
Last edited by Pukka Cheese on 24 Aug 2017, 14:37, edited 4 times in total.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47061
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by gilgamesh »

Surprised any American fight is ever PPV in the U.K.

You got a lot of gall to charge somebody money for ANYTHING at 3 AM.

Outside of maybe Hookers or Drugs :lol:
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by rossij8 »

gilgamesh wrote:Surprised any American fight is ever PPV in the U.K.

You got a lot of gall to charge somebody money for ANYTHING at 3 AM.

Outside of maybe Hookers or Drugs :lol:
:lol:

Every US PPV I've ever paid for I feel like I've been shortchanged

Hang on, the same goes for most UK ones as well..
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Canelo Vs. GGG no longer B0xnati0n PPV?

Post by chad »

I have a feeling the announcement of how to watch Canelo Vs. GGG has been delayed until they have sorted out PPV on the various TV platforms. I think it'll turn out trying to launch the facility on Virgin Media has been a drag. I'd imagine a allegedly PPV app will pop up on TiVo and V6 fairly soon.....
Post Reply