Suggestions for BoxRec - Archived
-
FightFan1912
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 38
- Joined: 19 Jun 2014, 14:33
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
Any update on the missing KO figures?
Thanks
Thanks
-
Controversial
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9152
- Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
Hi John, the numbering has disappeared since the recent changes to the site, any chance of it coming back, it was really useful.John wrote:we are going to try it out and see how it goes downControversial wrote:Haven't read through all the posts so not sure if already suggested.
I think every fighters record should be numbered so you can see at a glance how many fights they had when they fought someone, fought the a title, had their first loss etc...etc...
So Mike Tyson for example would read -
(3) Don Halpin
(2) Trent Singleton
(Debut) Hector Mercedes
That what if any of the old timers records are incomplete then the number could be skipped to show when a fight is missing off their record
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
If I'm on boxrec.com with my mobile phone I can't find a link to a forum any more after the update, can a link to the forum come back?
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
On left hand side, click on 3 vertical lines, which will open menu.asdfjkl wrote:If I'm on boxrec.com with my mobile phone I can't find a link to a forum any more after the update, can a link to the forum come back?
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
Why does the page not show the boxers records anymore, when looking at the schedule and when looking through other boxers records, this was one of the main features for visiting the site, I use my mobile most of the time
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
Using mobile or PC? Post the linkRogers21 wrote:Why does the page not show the boxers records anymore, when looking at the schedule and when looking through other boxers records, this was one of the main features for visiting the site, I use my mobile most of the time
-
chucktaylor
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 535
- Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 18:02
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
After the recent update, I only see the venue and city in bout results, but not the state or country.
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
Using PC or Mobile?chucktaylor wrote:After the recent update, I only see the venue and city in bout results, but not the state or country.
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
Using mobile just doesn't show the records unless you click on the boxerAntonS wrote:Using mobile or PC? Post the linkRogers21 wrote:Why does the page not show the boxers records anymore, when looking at the schedule and when looking through other boxers records, this was one of the main features for visiting the site, I use my mobile most of the time
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
You mean previous 6 bouts viewing results? If so there's insufficient space in Mobile mode to fit all the info. To view all info, including each boxer's record, click on circled 3 dots on right side & select view bout (2nd icon from left)Rogers21 wrote:Using mobile just doesn't show the records unless you click on the boxerAntonS wrote:Using mobile or PC? Post the linkRogers21 wrote:Why does the page not show the boxers records anymore, when looking at the schedule and when looking through other boxers records, this was one of the main features for visiting the site, I use my mobile most of the time
-
StarLord25
- Welterweight
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 13 Apr 2016, 20:23
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
jimglen wrote:Boxer's Ratings or Rankings.
2 points far a WIN (1 more for KO or stoppage win).
1 Point for a Draw
10 Points for Elimination/Contention Tournament Wins
5 Points for Elimination/Contention Tournament loss
10 Points for Regional Belt Wins
5 Points for Regional Belt loss
15 Points for National Title Wins
10 Points for a National Title loss
15 Points for Alphabet Belt Wins
10 Points for Alphabet Belt loss
20 Points for LIGIT World TITLE (lineal title) loss
30 Points for LIGIT World TITLE (lineal title) WINS
or something to this effect...
this too me would put the fighters ratings closer to real life and not miles apart, either too high or low from one another.
NOOOOOOOOO. The thing that makes these rankings great is that it doesn't factor in pathetic alphabet belts or belts at all. Keep it that way.
-
StarLord25
- Welterweight
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 13 Apr 2016, 20:23
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
StarLord25 wrote:How about showing what fighters were ranked at the time in the bout data?
Bump
-
Mastrangelos
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 402
- Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 17:34
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
I guess I'm getting used to it.. but still miss the fight number next to each fight for a boxer. Simple thing which was added in last update, but made things a lot easier for me.
Also, another thing which was changed in last update and is now back to how it once was - is the order of fights in prizefighter tournament being reversed, so final showing as being first on the record, then semi, then first round.
I wonder what was the reason for change by the way? I genuinly think the last look was pretty much perfect.
Also, another thing which was changed in last update and is now back to how it once was - is the order of fights in prizefighter tournament being reversed, so final showing as being first on the record, then semi, then first round.
I wonder what was the reason for change by the way? I genuinly think the last look was pretty much perfect.
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
IMO, other than assisting would be boxing scribes & commentators' blah blah during the fight......Who cares?StarLord25 wrote:StarLord25 wrote:How about showing what fighters were ranked at the time in the bout data?
Bump
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
I do care actually, it matters a lot to me that Lennox Lewis did fight Mike Tyson, but Lennox did that while Tyson only had a rating of 308 left (similar like Thomas Adamek), while earlier, when Mike Tyson had a rating of 1320, Lennox wanted none of that fight.AntonS wrote:IMO, other than assisting would be boxing scribes & commentators' blah blah during the fight......Who cares?StarLord25 wrote:StarLord25 wrote:How about showing what fighters were ranked at the time in the bout data?
Bump
Also note that a lot of Wilderboy fans now say, look at Johann Duhaupas! He's rank 15 and Wilder beat him! Yea, but Wilder won while he used to be rank 36 or so at the time and wasn't even a fultime pro.
We currently say that the heavyweight top is avoiding each other all the time and with such a system you can easely see that bumfighters like Daffy Duck for example don't dare to fight Shannon Briggs, but at the same time does dare to fight rank 200 or so Mark Dummery.
So Mark might have had 30 wins 1 loss, he's no way near a top contender. Werner Kreiskott with 19 loses has a similar rank.
I have asked something similar once, but then people say that the server probably couldn't handle that, somehow all these odd site changes it appearantly can handle.
-
StarLord25
- Welterweight
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 13 Apr 2016, 20:23
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
THANK YOU. Exactly the point. Even Stiverne and Duhaupas weren't that highly ranked when they fought Wilder back on Boxrec. So it'd be good to knw what their ranking was at the time the fights happened. Plus it gives fans a case to show that a fighter has been fighting top competition in his weight class.asdfjkl wrote:I do care actually, it matters a lot to me that Lennox Lewis did fight Mike Tyson, but Lennox did that while Tyson only had a rating of 308 left (similar like Thomas Adamek), while earlier, when Mike Tyson had a rating of 1320, Lennox wanted none of that fight.AntonS wrote:IMO, other than assisting would be boxing scribes & commentators' blah blah during the fight......Who cares?StarLord25 wrote:
Bump
Also note that a lot of Wilderboy fans now say, look at Johann Duhaupas! He's rank 15 and Wilder beat him! Yea, but Wilder won while he used to be rank 36 or so at the time and wasn't even a fultime pro.
We currently say that the heavyweight top is avoiding each other all the time and with such a system you can easely see that bumfighters like Daffy Duck for example don't dare to fight Shannon Briggs, but at the same time does dare to fight rank 200 or so Mark Dummery.
So Mark might have had 30 wins 1 loss, he's no way near a top contender. Werner Kreiskott with 19 loses has a similar rank.
I have asked something similar once, but then people say that the server probably couldn't handle that, somehow all these odd site changes it appearantly can handle.
-
AmuckFighting
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 04 Feb 2016, 21:43
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
Bring back the Champion's Table?
-
Pulpfriction
- Welterweight
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 05 Feb 2016, 15:35
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
Not sure why but when i look at fighters records. Opponents records or where the venue took place are no longer visible, WHY?!?!?!?
-
StarLord25
- Welterweight
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 13 Apr 2016, 20:23
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
Bump bump.StarLord25 wrote:THANK YOU. Exactly the point. Even Stiverne and Duhaupas weren't that highly ranked when they fought Wilder back on Boxrec. So it'd be good to knw what their ranking was at the time the fights happened. Plus it gives fans a case to show that a fighter has been fighting top competition in his weight class.asdfjkl wrote:I do care actually, it matters a lot to me that Lennox Lewis did fight Mike Tyson, but Lennox did that while Tyson only had a rating of 308 left (similar like Thomas Adamek), while earlier, when Mike Tyson had a rating of 1320, Lennox wanted none of that fight.AntonS wrote:IMO, other than assisting would be boxing scribes & commentators' blah blah during the fight......Who cares?
Also note that a lot of Wilderboy fans now say, look at Johann Duhaupas! He's rank 15 and Wilder beat him! Yea, but Wilder won while he used to be rank 36 or so at the time and wasn't even a fultime pro.
We currently say that the heavyweight top is avoiding each other all the time and with such a system you can easely see that bumfighters like Daffy Duck for example don't dare to fight Shannon Briggs, but at the same time does dare to fight rank 200 or so Mark Dummery.
So Mark might have had 30 wins 1 loss, he's no way near a top contender. Werner Kreiskott with 19 loses has a similar rank.
I have asked something similar once, but then people say that the server probably couldn't handle that, somehow all these odd site changes it appearantly can handle.
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
I would like the my Watching list to come up first when I login to the site. I would also like it to be earlier in the menus so that I don't have to click around to find out if my guys are fighting.
Thanks for "fixing" the date sort on Watching!!
Thanks for "fixing" the date sort on Watching!!
-
Pulpfriction
- Welterweight
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 05 Feb 2016, 15:35
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
Bump!!! Bring back opponnents records and venue on boxrec.Pulpfriction wrote:Not sure why but when i look at fighters records. Opponents records or where the venue took place are no longer visible, WHY?!?!?!?
-
chucktaylor
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 535
- Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 18:02
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
I see the same thing with Windows and OSX, both Firefox and Safari. On iOS, I do not see the location at all.AntonS wrote:Using PC or Mobile?chucktaylor wrote:After the recent update, I only see the venue and city in bout results, but not the state or country.
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
Please bring back the ability to directly click on events in the Watchlist
-
StarLord25
- Welterweight
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 13 Apr 2016, 20:23
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
I noticed I can't see the rating points on I turn them on. I have to look at the bouts themselves to see them. It'd be nice if this could go back to that way.
Oh, and again please show what they were rank at the time for their fights.
Oh, and again please show what they were rank at the time for their fights.
Re: Suggestions for BoxRec
After the recent update I can't access my watching list.Rather than that i get a message saying "Something has gone wrong...Something unexpected has happened, if this problem persists please contact us. You can carry on using BoxRec by returning to the homepage." Please, get it fixed.