Ok, so you just think nothing of Crawford. Fair enough, I think highly of him. Taylor is the only fighter on the list I'd give a good chance of beating him and he schooled Chavez.Coco wrote:TaylorSaadOffTheDeck wrote:Who did Chavez ever beat to make you think he could beat someone like Crawford? Legitimately beat I should say.Coco wrote:Who has he beat to make you think he could beat an ATG like Chavez? As of yet he is not fit to carry his jockstrap!
Camache
Haugen
Lockeridge
Mayweather
Laporte
Limon
Rosario
Ramerez
Tony Lopez
Gonzalez
Terence Crawford
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Terence Crawford
-
CaptainSpacerod
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21
Re: Terence Crawford
Why do you hate him Saad, the Hagler situation ?SaadOffTheDeck wrote: I hate Leonard much more,
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Terence Crawford
Nah, I actually won money on that. It started when I was very young. The 76 Olympics was huge for me and I was born in the same state. None of that mattered, as a kid I liked Duran, Benitez and hearns(my favorite ever). Then when I grew up and saw that the whole all American boy thing was a complete act for the media it intensified.CaptainSpacerod wrote:Why do you hate him Saad, the Hagler situation ?SaadOffTheDeck wrote: I hate Leonard much more,
-He could be a beacon for gay people, instead he screams rape.
-Made commercials with his kid while he neglected him and beat his Mom.
-Always had to have every advantage, not the first, nor the last, but none of the leonard's or Mayweather's are on my rooting list.
All that being said, he'd only be behind Duran in my 40 years of watching Boxing. Easily a top 20 all time.
-
paddy chavez
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2678
- Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08
Re: Terence Crawford
why wasn't taylor legit chavez battered him and the ref stopped it ,taylor was a shell of himself after he took a beatingSaadOffTheDeck wrote:Taylor wasn't legitimate, I think Crawford is better than Camacho and Rosario, but at least that's an answer. If that's it, then it certainly isn't out of line to think Chavez would have a tough night against a fighter where his only clear advantage would be legacy.paddy chavez wrote:Camacho, Rosario, meldrick Taylor to name a fewSaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Who did Chavez ever beat to make you think he could beat someone like Crawford? Legitimately beat I should say.
Re: Terence Crawford
paddy chavez wrote:why wasn't taylor legit chavez battered him and the ref stopped it ,taylor was a shell of himself after he took a beatingSaadOffTheDeck wrote:Taylor wasn't legitimate, I think Crawford is better than Camacho and Rosario, but at least that's an answer. If that's it, then it certainly isn't out of line to think Chavez would have a tough night against a fighter where his only clear advantage would be legacy.paddy chavez wrote:
Camacho, Rosario, meldrick Taylor to name a few
It was an even round right up untill a solid right by Chavez at 25 seconds to go. Another combination and a single straight right hand put Taylor down at about 15 seconds to go. He was up at 5 and ready to go but Steele did what nobody expected and stopped him. I don't think Chavez could have hit him again in the two seconds left. I believe Steele was In Don Kings pocket and pulled it out of the bag for his boss.
-
CaptainSpacerod
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21
Re: Terence Crawford
Fair enough I can see you have your reasons but isn't the first one media speculation rather than fact ?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Nah, I actually won money on that. It started when I was very young. The 76 Olympics was huge for me and I was born in the same state. None of that mattered, as a kid I liked Duran, Benitez and hearns(my favorite ever). Then when I grew up and saw that the whole all American boy thing was a complete act for the media it intensified.
-He could be a beacon for gay people, instead he screams rape.
-Made commercials with his kid while he neglected him and beat his Mom.
-Always had to have every advantage, not the first, nor the last, but none of the leonard's or Mayweather's are on my rooting list.
All that being said, he'd only be behind Duran in my 40 years of watching Boxing. Easily a top 20 all time.
Re: Terence Crawford
Mate, you're a good poster but this is well wide of the mark. I actually just went and watched round 12 again as I just couldn't reconcile what you're saying here with what I remembered. Firstly, there is no way that could be regarded as an even round up until the 25 second mark - Taylor wasn't out of it, but Chavez was more accurate, was clearly so much more heavy-handed and was dictating the pace.Tomasino wrote:paddy chavez wrote:why wasn't taylor legit chavez battered him and the ref stopped it ,taylor was a shell of himself after he took a beatingSaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Taylor wasn't legitimate, I think Crawford is better than Camacho and Rosario, but at least that's an answer. If that's it, then it certainly isn't out of line to think Chavez would have a tough night against a fighter where his only clear advantage would be legacy.
It was an even round right up untill a solid right by Chavez at 25 seconds to go. Another combination and a single straight right hand put Taylor down at about 15 seconds to go. He was up at 5 and ready to go but Steele did what nobody expected and stopped him. I don't think Chavez could have hit him again in the two seconds left. I believe Steele was In Don Kings pocket and pulled it out of the bag for his boss.
As for him being up at 5 and "ready to go"
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Terence Crawford
Surely you've heard the other side of that story? Taylor was robbed.paddy chavez wrote:why wasn't taylor legit chavez battered him and the ref stopped it ,taylor was a shell of himself after he took a beatingSaadOffTheDeck wrote:Taylor wasn't legitimate, I think Crawford is better than Camacho and Rosario, but at least that's an answer. If that's it, then it certainly isn't out of line to think Chavez would have a tough night against a fighter where his only clear advantage would be legacy.paddy chavez wrote:
Camacho, Rosario, meldrick Taylor to name a few
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Terence Crawford
Tomasino wrote:paddy chavez wrote:why wasn't taylor legit chavez battered him and the ref stopped it ,taylor was a shell of himself after he took a beatingSaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Taylor wasn't legitimate, I think Crawford is better than Camacho and Rosario, but at least that's an answer. If that's it, then it certainly isn't out of line to think Chavez would have a tough night against a fighter where his only clear advantage would be legacy.
It was an even round right up untill a solid right by Chavez at 25 seconds to go. Another combination and a single straight right hand put Taylor down at about 15 seconds to go. He was up at 5 and ready to go but Steele did what nobody expected and stopped him. I don't think Chavez could have hit him again in the two seconds left. I believe Steele was In Don Kings pocket and pulled it out of the bag for his boss.
Corruption won the randall rematch too.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Terence Crawford
It's a fact that when he was in his late teens his penis was in a mans mouth multiple times. I just don't buy that an old man forced his mouth on one of the best amateur boxers in the world's penis. I suppose I should call him bisexual, just seems insulting to me to call it abuse.CaptainSpacerod wrote:Fair enough I can see you have your reasons but isn't the first one media speculation rather than fact ?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Nah, I actually won money on that. It started when I was very young. The 76 Olympics was huge for me and I was born in the same state. None of that mattered, as a kid I liked Duran, Benitez and hearns(my favorite ever). Then when I grew up and saw that the whole all American boy thing was a complete act for the media it intensified.
-He could be a beacon for gay people, instead he screams rape.
-Made commercials with his kid while he neglected him and beat his Mom.
-Always had to have every advantage, not the first, nor the last, but none of the leonard's or Mayweather's are on my rooting list.
All that being said, he'd only be behind Duran in my 40 years of watching Boxing. Easily a top 20 all time.
-
CaptainSpacerod
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21
Re: Terence Crawford
The forum's suddenly exploded with cocksucking commentsSaadOffTheDeck wrote:It's a fact that when he was in his late teens his penis was in a mans mouth multiple times. I just don't buy that an old man forced his mouth on one of the best amateur boxers in the world's penis. I suppose I should call him bisexual, just seems insulting to me to call it abuse.
When you say it's a fact though - according to who ? Have any of his "partners" publicly attested to the fact ? I'm assuming Leonard denies it ...
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Terence Crawford
He came out publicly to talk about it and generate more publicity for the book. I never read it, but I assume he was telling the truth. Gay love is a hell of a lie for a 'straight' man.CaptainSpacerod wrote:The forum's suddenly exploded with cocksucking commentsSaadOffTheDeck wrote:It's a fact that when he was in his late teens his penis was in a mans mouth multiple times. I just don't buy that an old man forced his mouth on one of the best amateur boxers in the world's penis. I suppose I should call him bisexual, just seems insulting to me to call it abuse.![]()
When you say it's a fact though - according to who ? Have any of his "partners" publicly attested to the fact ? I'm assuming Leonard denies it ...
Re: Terence Crawford
I never read it either, madness