Is this a black eye for boxing?
Is this a black eye for boxing?
That a farce fight involving a boxer and a non boxer who struggled in sparring against a c level like van heerden and only looks good against a fat tv commentator will be/or has the chance to be the biggest ppv fight ever financielly?
Finance aside, for me the most important thing was always "was the fight great or not" and not how muxh money it generated. But i have to say it bothers me a bit that a circus fight could become ppv #1 financielly. It also suxks how less promo a real fight like ggg/canelo gets.
I mean, boxing (the boxers and promoters) also play a huge negativ role why a circus fight could become the biggest ppv fight ever. Floyd not willing to face pac when they were prime. Tysons poor life descisions and training atitude..circumstances..time...etc.....
Finance aside, for me the most important thing was always "was the fight great or not" and not how muxh money it generated. But i have to say it bothers me a bit that a circus fight could become ppv #1 financielly. It also suxks how less promo a real fight like ggg/canelo gets.
I mean, boxing (the boxers and promoters) also play a huge negativ role why a circus fight could become the biggest ppv fight ever. Floyd not willing to face pac when they were prime. Tysons poor life descisions and training atitude..circumstances..time...etc.....
-
Sequitorian
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1766
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 15:35
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
The spectacle is the medium ... the spectacle is the message ...
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
BlablaSequitorian wrote:The spectacle is the medium ... the spectacle is the message ...
-
Best Coast
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3133
- Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
This is a circus and not a serious athletic event. Quit taking it so seriously...just relax and enjoy it!!
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
Free is the best revenge.
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
Exactly. Wounder how succesful they gonne be against the streams....at the end everything ends up on yutub
-
Sequitorian
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1766
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 15:35
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
Tell that to Marshall McLuhan ...Jip wrote:BlablaSequitorian wrote:The spectacle is the medium ... the spectacle is the message ...
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
Mayweather has been a black eye for boxing for many, many years. The WBC, WBA, WBO, and IBF have been a black eye for boxing for even longer.
This fight? Nah, you can't blame it. Boxing's troubles were around long before this fight.
This fight? Nah, you can't blame it. Boxing's troubles were around long before this fight.
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
If/when Mayweather takes him to school it will do boxing some good PR imo - for anyone developing an interest in combat sports the UFC is about to look like the Vauxhall Conference compared to the Premier League.
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
I was impressed by the video. Still am. But the dude he was beating up was paulie. A out of prime semi retired out of shape boxer.Chippo wrote:You said you were "impressed" by the video of McGregor sparring. As a boxing expert, it's odd that you have now changed your mind.Jip wrote:That a farce fight involving a boxer and a non boxer who struggled in sparring against a c level like van heerden and only looks good against a fat tv commentator will be/or has the chance to be the biggest ppv fight ever financielly?
Finance aside, for me the most important thing was always "was the fight great or not" and not how muxh money it generated. But i have to say it bothers me a bit that a circus fight could become ppv #1 financielly. It also suxks how less promo a real fight like ggg/canelo gets.
I mean, boxing (the boxers and promoters) also play a huge negativ role why a circus fight could become the biggest ppv fight ever. Floyd not willing to face pac when they were prime. Tysons poor life descisions and training atitude..circumstances..time...etc.....
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
Good pointRicky_ wrote:If/when Mayweather takes him to school it will do boxing some good PR imo - for anyone developing an interest in combat sports the UFC is about to look like the Vauxhall Conference compared to the Premier League.
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
Asterix wrote:Mayweather has been a black eye for boxing for many, many years. The WBC, WBA, WBO, and IBF have been a black eye for boxing for even longer.
This fight? Nah, you can't blame it. Boxing's troubles were around long before this fight.
True
-
littlekinny
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 255
- Joined: 19 Oct 2009, 07:36
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
Cant really agree. Don't see how any outcome can be good PR for boxing.Jip wrote:Good pointRicky_ wrote:If/when Mayweather takes him to school it will do boxing some good PR imo - for anyone developing an interest in combat sports the UFC is about to look like the Vauxhall Conference compared to the Premier League.
If he wins, he was supposed to. Hes the best of his generation and undefeated.
If he struggles or loses it reflects very badly.
Buffer made a good point. Said the winners were all those involved and Vegas, the losers are the fans and the sport. Kind of agree with him tbh.
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
littlekinny wrote:Cant really agree. Don't see how any outcome can be good PR for boxing.Jip wrote:Good pointRicky_ wrote:If/when Mayweather takes him to school it will do boxing some good PR imo - for anyone developing an interest in combat sports the UFC is about to look like the Vauxhall Conference compared to the Premier League.
If he wins, he was supposed to. Hes the best of his generation and undefeated.
If he struggles or loses it reflects very badly.
You seem to be looking at it from Floyd's persepective rather than Boxing's.
UFC are sending in their best pugilist to fight boxing's best pugilist. Many UFC fans believe their sport produces better fighters in every department, including boxing. Their best 'striker' is about to look like a rank amateur, swinging and missing all over the place while getting his face mashed in.... and it's going take place in one of the largest global audiences ever to watch a sporting event.
On Sunday morning the sport of boxing will be like the cat that got the cream, advising the UFC to stick to wrestling in underpants.
-
FastestHandsInThewest
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 174
- Joined: 16 Jun 2017, 01:11
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
Naw it's great for boxing.
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
One of the best posts this year.Ricky_ wrote:littlekinny wrote:Cant really agree. Don't see how any outcome can be good PR for boxing.Jip wrote:
Good point
If he wins, he was supposed to. Hes the best of his generation and undefeated.
If he struggles or loses it reflects very badly.
You seem to be looking at it from Floyd's persepective rather than Boxing's.
UFC are sending in their best pugilist to fight boxing's best pugilist. Many UFC fans believe their sport produces better fighters in every department, including boxing. Their best 'striker' is about to look like a rank amateur, swinging and missing all over the place while getting his face mashed in.... and it's going take place in one of the largest global audiences ever to watch a sporting event.
On Sunday morning the sport of boxing will be like the cat that got the cream, advising the UFC to stick to wrestling in underpants.
Totaly true. People have been disrespecting boxing for so long. They said ufc would take over boxing and that ufc fighters are the best. Now we are going to see who realy the best is. Connor was the ONLY attraction in the ufc, nobidy watches this sh.:t anymore and those ufc guys are what i said they were a bunch of roided stupid bar brawler. Boxing is the #1 sport, the #1 entertainmant in all the world ever, nothing, no film, no music, nothing brings the excitemant of a great match up, a great fight and a great KO. boxing is King, will reign supreme.
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
It'll ultimately be merely a footnote in Boxing history unless the monumental upset happens.
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
It ll quieten the ufc fans. Boxing #1. A old past prime boxer will easily defeat the mma p4p best young prime connor. This shows the dominanten if boxing.
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
It's only a black eye for boxing if Mayweather loses.
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
The debate of Boxing vs MMA will probably live on. But nobody ever remembers a washed up James Toney vs... i dunno, whoever. Floyd vs McGregor is 'thee' ultimate spectacle in crossover, cited forever more when the subject comes up.gilgamesh wrote:It'll ultimately be merely a footnote in Boxing history unless the monumental upset happens.
-
Sequitorian
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1766
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 15:35
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
... wel sed ...Jip wrote:It ll quieten the ufc fans. Boxing #1. A old past prime boxer will easily defeat the mma p4p best young prime connor. This shows the dominanten if boxing.
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
If Donald Trump fought Barack Obama everyone in the world would want to watch it. This isn't really about boxing. It's not even really sport. It's entertainment.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Is this a black eye for boxing?
Not at all.